|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Mon Jul-16-07 11:57 PM Original message |
Yes, I believe in affirmative action, and yes it is time for a President of color. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackDragna
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
1. I'd settle for a president.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:04 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Hear, hear! But why just "settle?" nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jillian
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:35 AM Response to Reply #1 |
15. To quote my teenage daughter "That was random" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
2. I so think you 're a plant; prove me wrong. Bye,. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:04 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. What kind of plant? Redwood tree? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bling bling
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:17 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Brilliant retort. Are you a master in the art of political debate or something? No fair!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:29 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. No, but I recognize people who are disingenuous. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:42 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. Please explain, how do you perceive me being disingenuous? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
5. Your second full paragraph is a mess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:13 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:15 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. It's your thread. You haven't defined that reality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:19 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I defined it in the OP. I don't think you're reading carefully enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:24 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. It bears repeating since you can't seem to follow your own topic: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:30 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. It's all in the OP, but I will rephrase it for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jillian
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:33 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Obama is a GREAT politician |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:35 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. In a sense, yes. In another sense, no. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:37 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Again, your post is a mess. Has someone claimed that Barack Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:40 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Of course we cannot sure. Please read more carefully. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:42 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Potential inhabits all presidents, dude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:45 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. I agree: "potential inhabits all Presidents" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:49 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. You seem unwilling or unable to grasp the contradiction in your own |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:49 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. We agree to disagee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:51 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. I'm tired of talking to a block of concrete. So long to you and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
24. delete. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 01:05 AM Response to Original message |
25. I hear what you're saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 01:07 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Last time I checked none of the candidates' ideas had been copyrighted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 01:13 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Umm, I did try to stay civil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 01:17 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Fair enough. I don't see it that way, but fair enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 01:34 AM Response to Original message |
29. He's not even competitive at this point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 02:04 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. O.K., he's not in the race yet. You certainly have an interesting criteria. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 03:21 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. He's behind nationally and in virtually every state-nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 02:11 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Well, then by your criteria no one is in the race, and there is no race. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 05:30 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Very good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 02:22 AM Response to Original message |
31. You are contradicting yourself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 03:40 AM Response to Original message |
33. Will Obama be hiring more Republicans to work on his campaign? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DangerDave921
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 07:13 AM Response to Original message |
34. Color |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Tue Jul-17-07 07:18 AM Response to Original message |
35. In 1960, John Kennedy's Catholicism was a major campaign issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC