|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 08:31 AM Original message |
Gallup: Clinton most "acceptable" as a candidate in Democratic field |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
1. "Every one in the margin of error." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 08:44 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. which is why the excerpt I posted said "about as many." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 08:54 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Hello learned opponent, how 'bout posting the truth instead? *Statistical Dead Heat* nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 08:57 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. mere semantics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 08:52 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Lies, Damn Lies, and that from the HRC fronted - Frank Luntz School of Smarmy Statistical Analysis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 08:58 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. so Gallup has been "infiltrated?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:06 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. No, it's not Gallup but those who choose to *skew* dead heat results into victory for HRC. :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:07 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. "about as many" = "statistical dead heat." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 01:45 PM Response to Reply #14 |
41. The "about as many" which is NOT = "statistical dead heat" is conveniently missing from VISIBILITY..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 02:27 PM Response to Reply #41 |
51. are you blind? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. Come on and admit it ... you LIED and MISLEAD with the visible portion of your thread title? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 04:11 PM Response to Reply #54 |
60. c'mon, admit it. You see black helicoptors buzzing your house every night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 10:28 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. Nope, but I've been trained by the govt to determine what represents volitional disinformation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Jul-20-07 05:51 AM Response to Reply #62 |
71. LOL! Oh, that's rich! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Jul-20-07 05:57 AM Response to Reply #71 |
74. You can't verify it but I did work for NPRDC during the 1980s as a Graduate Teaching Assistant ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Jul-20-07 06:14 AM Response to Reply #74 |
77. that's true. I can't be verified and, based on your posting history, it isn't believable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Jul-20-07 07:57 AM Response to Reply #77 |
81. "It" can't be verified. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
2. People don't really know the candidates all that much yet. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
3. Oh, please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
5. she has the highest negatives and repukes are praying she is the nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
draft_mario_cuomo
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 02:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
47. So why is Republican Wall Street lining up behind Obama, not HRC (a DLC leader)? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hot_for_hillary
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
8. The more people see of her, the more they will like her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 08:58 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. The more I see Hillary the more I'm convinced she's a corporate whore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hot_for_hillary
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:01 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. OK, let me know when Kucinich is electable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:11 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. That makes one of us, for if the DLC's darling scores the WH, we will, in essence, be left with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:14 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. ShortnFiery, let's see if you have the "knowledge" to back your rhetoric |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:30 AM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Ditto. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
draft_mario_cuomo
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 02:25 PM Response to Reply #17 |
50. HRC is DLC so let's vote for a DLCer who is even more popular with corporate America? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:23 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Hillary is a republican in practice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:29 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. let's see if YOU have the knowledge to match your rhetoric |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:52 AM Response to Reply #21 |
29. "We're Eisenhower Republicans here," Bill Clinton reflected, shortly after being elected president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 10:09 AM Response to Reply #29 |
36. that was taken from a book by James MacGregor Burns... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur
![]() |
Fri Jul-20-07 03:50 AM Response to Reply #36 |
68. Unlike you some of us have real jobs so can't monitor DU 24/7 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Jul-20-07 04:41 AM Response to Reply #68 |
69. You got that right ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Jul-20-07 05:57 AM Response to Reply #69 |
73. you ducked and dodged the question, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Jul-20-07 06:01 AM Response to Reply #73 |
75. No, there's absolutely no ducking and dodging here when you throw up a ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Jul-20-07 06:12 AM Response to Reply #75 |
76. you're the one claiming the Clintons and the DLC are Republicans. You can't explain why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Jul-20-07 05:55 AM Response to Reply #68 |
72. well, you've certainly found tme to reply here and elsewhere... duck and dodge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:09 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. lakespur just LOVES that term "corporate whore." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:24 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. The term fits Hillary like a condom does Bill's private parts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:31 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. too bad you've yet to pick a candidate who isn't one based on your criteria. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:39 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. You don't know what my criteria is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:45 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. I'll rephrase it then and see if you still duck and dodge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:52 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Nope, wrong as always |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:54 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. who, then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
draft_mario_cuomo
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 02:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
48. So why is she being crushed by Obama almost 2-to-1 on Wall Street? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 11:10 PM Response to Reply #48 |
64. Better for the Republican agenda.. Obama voted Condi into her Cab apt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:10 AM Response to Reply #8 |
16. She's been around for almost two decades. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hot_for_hillary
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:35 AM Response to Reply #16 |
24. Not in the context of a presidential candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:39 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Well,I disagree that she was that much in the background. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hot_for_hillary
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 10:00 AM Response to Reply #26 |
33. She may have been visible, but as a first lady. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #33 |
55. I've not known a person to date who pads their resume with the line "I was married to the boss." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 11:12 PM Response to Reply #55 |
65. Mrs. Springsteen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Jul-20-07 06:15 AM Response to Reply #55 |
78. Paddding resumes? Was Obama a Professor or a lecturer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:42 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. If she was just this person in the background |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hot_for_hillary
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 09:59 AM Response to Reply #27 |
32. I didn't say she is a neophyte, she is considered the former first lady |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 10:21 AM Response to Reply #32 |
38. So, she's a candidate who has had one term in the senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 10:14 AM Response to Reply #8 |
37. And the closer we get to the primaries, the more we'll see paid-posters popping up on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
draft_mario_cuomo
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 02:23 PM Response to Reply #8 |
49. I agree. I am an example of this. I used to strongly dislike her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #49 |
57. One thing I know for certain, your hatred of Obama (all the threads you have started) is FOREVER. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
draft_mario_cuomo
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 03:57 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. Sure, I am biased but I laid out why I think that will happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
34. Well I guess that's it. It's over. Done. Finale. Gonzo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 10:49 AM Response to Reply #34 |
39. It is over... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 06:43 PM Response to Reply #39 |
61. Over the top, maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
35. Not a big difference between candidates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #35 |
43. Correction - NO STATISTICAL DIFFERENCE between candidates. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 02:07 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. As the OP made very clear... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 02:54 PM Response to Reply #45 |
53. Deleted message |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 03:27 PM Response to Reply #53 |
58. And you have a grad degree you say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 11:27 PM Response to Reply #43 |
66. Except that the OP stated a falsehood... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
40. *sigh* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 01:50 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. If HRC is elected it will, in essence be, Bill Clinton's THIRD Presidential term as his cronies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 02:04 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Both agree and disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Fri Jul-20-07 07:32 AM Response to Reply #42 |
80. Not to flame you, but I just wonder what you would do if HRC indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
46. Key caveat. She is that "acceptable" among Democrats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 02:29 PM Response to Reply #46 |
52. That this was apoll of Democrats was included in the OP... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
56. Interesting, cause 100% of the Democrats I've asked find her unacceptable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 11:07 PM Response to Reply #56 |
63. Interesting, 63% say she'll likely be president! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani
![]() |
Thu Jul-19-07 11:40 PM Response to Original message |
67. Mainly acceptable to Rupert Murdoch and Wall Street n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Jul-20-07 06:15 AM Response to Reply #67 |
79. who, Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan
![]() |
Fri Jul-20-07 05:42 AM Response to Original message |
70. Here's the good news: her Presidency will torture the Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilith Velkor
![]() |
Fri Jul-20-07 09:55 AM Response to Reply #70 |
82. That's why I support her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 25th 2024, 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC