|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:23 PM Original message |
John Edwards--not just the BEST choice, the ONLY choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. I choose Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Additionally... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Exactly, which is why I replied to Cafferty when he asked yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. No, that's NOT what really counts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:04 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. So someone who made a really bad decision now tells us what he would do better now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:05 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Everyone's made at least one really, really bad decision... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 04:14 PM Response to Reply #19 |
33. Yes, you are correct. Edwards' choice to pimp for war was a very bad decision... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 06:36 PM Response to Reply #19 |
50. Yes, that is why Edwards concerns me. He's made the same mistake with his Iran rhetoric. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemDogs
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 07:51 PM Response to Reply #50 |
63. He has to be the nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QueenOfCalifornia
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:04 AM Response to Reply #63 |
114. Tee-Heee! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:47 AM Response to Reply #50 |
108. Kucinich calls for strength through peace like FDR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:46 AM Response to Reply #19 |
107. Kucinich didn't!...Kucinich/Edwards '08...the truth ticket |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:58 AM Response to Reply #19 |
150. Edwards has made SEVERAL really bad decisions and took |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 11:17 PM Response to Reply #18 |
83. "So someone who made a really bad decision now tells us what he would do better now?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:26 AM Response to Reply #15 |
120. Then why isn't he in the Senate? You know, like Kerry? {nt} |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:12 PM Response to Reply #15 |
180. Been there, done that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:40 PM Response to Reply #180 |
253. "Been there, done that" How flip can you be?!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ripple
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #15 |
182. You're trying to excuse the inexcusable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dugggy
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 04:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
34. But Edwards is smart enough to admit a mistake and change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. "smart" is not the word I would use |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnotherGreenWorld
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 06:16 PM Response to Reply #34 |
43. If Edwards ran on his Senate record, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 07:35 PM Response to Reply #43 |
56. If Edwards ran on his Senate record |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnotherGreenWorld
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 08:21 PM Response to Reply #56 |
69. Support for the war, support for the Patriot Act? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 09:06 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Simple proposition for him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lynnertic
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 10:45 PM Response to Reply #69 |
74. I would like to add that in contrast, Kucinich supported neither the war nor the Patriot Act. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:49 AM Response to Reply #69 |
109. Kucinich voted against Auth.to Use Mil force,Patriot,Mac,Fund,FISA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:30 AM Response to Reply #109 |
121. And was Pro-Life and Anti-Stem Cell Research until one week before announcing his '04 bid. {nt} |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 07:07 AM Response to Reply #121 |
131. stuff it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dugggy
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 06:46 PM Response to Reply #56 |
260. I agree on that point 100%...Edwards would be higher in polls if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 06:34 PM Response to Reply #34 |
49. No. He's a hypocritical political opportunist who will say anything he thinks might help him win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemDogs
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 07:54 PM Response to Reply #49 |
64. A progressive man of principle who will ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:44 PM Response to Reply #64 |
256. JE supporters, seems to me, are basically dreamers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dugggy
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 06:52 PM Response to Reply #64 |
261. can you name one elected president as progressive as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 11:11 PM Response to Reply #49 |
82. well aren't you on fire with your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #49 |
164. A politician? Imagine that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 11:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
90. RFK; Bobby Kennedy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:45 AM Response to Reply #90 |
145. I wasn't aware "RFK; Bobby Kennedy" was running. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:23 AM Response to Reply #1 |
119. I just can't vote for someone who counts Sen Coburn as his good friend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:46 AM Response to Reply #119 |
146. It is an expression of speech -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:56 AM Response to Reply #146 |
170. A figure of speech? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 12:08 PM Response to Reply #170 |
175. Oh, the faux outrage!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:26 PM Response to Reply #175 |
193. It's not outrage...it's disgust. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:12 PM Response to Reply #193 |
208. Your anger is spilling over inappropriately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:24 PM Response to Reply #208 |
218. Who are you to declare what's "inappropriate?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:56 PM Response to Reply #218 |
228. F*ck decorum? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:57 PM Response to Reply #228 |
229. Yeah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:01 PM Response to Reply #229 |
232. I have no clue why this is a Truth Vs. Decorum debate in your head. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:04 PM Response to Reply #232 |
237. When the pretty little lies are used to obfuscate the true nature |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:20 PM Response to Reply #237 |
245. Yeah, we get it ... F*ck decorum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 06:07 PM Response to Reply #245 |
259. Precisely...and I've explained why I say that ad nauseum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:10 PM Response to Reply #259 |
266. oh, I get it alright -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphire Blue
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:16 PM Response to Reply #193 |
210. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ripple
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:33 PM Response to Reply #146 |
185. Yep, any regular CSPAN viewer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:29 PM Response to Reply #185 |
194. Fuck decorum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ripple
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #194 |
203. I'm sure Edwards called plenty of political opponents his friends |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:27 PM Response to Reply #203 |
219. It's one thing to do so in the confines of the House or Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ripple
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:30 PM Response to Reply #219 |
250. Coburn and Obama worked on an ethics and lobbying reform bill together |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphire Blue
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #185 |
201. Yes, they refer to each other as such, but they DON'T say that they've BECOME good friends. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:04 PM Response to Reply #201 |
205. exaggeration + semantics = voila! A bogus talking point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphire Blue
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:15 PM Response to Reply #205 |
209. Was Obama exaggerating when he said that he & Coburn had become good friends? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:25 PM Response to Reply #209 |
212. Duh! That is apparently obvious to everyone except those -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphire Blue
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:45 PM Response to Reply #212 |
216. You're not making any sense at all; are you saying that Obama uses bogus talking points? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:28 PM Response to Reply #216 |
221. We're supposed to ignore that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:54 PM Response to Reply #216 |
227. It means he is a Senator that adheres to decorum & isn't an a-hole. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #227 |
230. So you say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:02 PM Response to Reply #230 |
234. Hey, any old port (or straw to grasp) in the storm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphire Blue
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:09 PM Response to Reply #227 |
240. Denial ain't just a river in Egypt! Obama said that he & Coburn have become "good friends". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:18 PM Response to Reply #240 |
243. Tune into CSPAN sometime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphire Blue
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:27 PM Response to Reply #243 |
249. What is it about Obama saying that he & Coburn have become "good friends" that you just can't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:33 PM Response to Reply #249 |
251. 5 minutes of CSPAN proves you wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphire Blue
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:38 PM Response to Reply #251 |
252. I hope you don't get dizzy from all your spinning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:43 PM Response to Reply #252 |
255. And your take on this is very, very silly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphire Blue
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:58 PM Response to Reply #255 |
258. You alternately deny & spin what Obama said, and you call me silly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:07 PM Response to Reply #258 |
265. Obama called a colleague a "good friend." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #240 |
269. Do you love Joe Lieberman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hurricaneric
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:56 AM Response to Reply #1 |
148. I wonder what Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:16 AM Response to Reply #148 |
153. In a 2002 speech, he came out hard against the Iraq War. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:24 AM Response to Reply #148 |
155. Obama spoke out against the war quite eloquently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:41 PM Response to Reply #148 |
270. You wonder...well...how about a little video of Obama in 2002 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rndmprsn
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
206. obama has funded the war at every step... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:20 PM Response to Reply #206 |
211. Obama was against the war from the get-go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rndmprsn
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:04 PM Response to Reply #211 |
217. obama's hands are not clean re the iraq war... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #217 |
231. It isn't hair-splitting to state Obama came out against the war before it even started. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. R&K |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
3. What working stiffs don't understand about huge houses for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. This is a VERY good point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 07:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
62. This is gonna drive me nuts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemDogs
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 08:01 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. House is under 10,000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 08:23 PM Response to Reply #65 |
70. Wrong. The main house is 10,400. Altogether, 28,000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnotherGreenWorld
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:00 AM Response to Reply #70 |
102. Thanks for posting that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smitty
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #3 |
20. Rich and powerful people built ridiculously large houses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
21. You're wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:57 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. I've seen it at 10,000 square feet with a pool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 05:36 PM Response to Reply #29 |
36. Why would you just make something up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 05:57 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Read a site a very long time ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 07:45 PM Response to Reply #39 |
60. Because you made an assertion without foundation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 07:45 PM Response to Reply #39 |
61. Because you made an assertion without foundation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemDogs
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 08:02 PM Response to Reply #29 |
66. Solar heated and Energy-Star |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:16 PM Response to Reply #66 |
242. It doesn't matter if he's using solar -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
4. Uh...yeah, well...the check is in the mail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Our REASON should tell us what the only choice is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:26 PM Response to Reply #6 |
192. Nor Am I... I Just Have To Post When I See John Edwards As The Subject... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:33 PM Response to Reply #192 |
195. It could be closer than you think in Florida this time around... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:51 PM Response to Reply #195 |
226. Naivete COULD Be What's Niggling At Me... And Perhaps I Get The |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
7. So he's been listening to Kucinich on terrorism, that's great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. It's not a new department... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
9. Beautifully put! Thank you Mythsaje! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
11. Someone should've told this to Zbigniew Brzezinski or Representative Patrick Murphy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:49 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I don't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:54 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. No offense, but I take Zbigniew Brzezinski's and Rep. Patrick Murphy's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Go for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I will... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. Who are you talking about with that statement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:34 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. I don't think Obama understands how dangerous some of these people actually ARE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 04:01 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:31 AM Response to Reply #30 |
124. Yes, I find Republican attack strategies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:50 AM Response to Reply #124 |
168. What "Republican attack strategies" are you referring to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:57 AM Response to Reply #168 |
171. Where have YOU been? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:29 PM Response to Reply #171 |
268. Another out of ammo argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #14 |
81. I'll listen to Bill Maher... lol n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:48 AM Response to Reply #81 |
166. Carter likes him too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
24. Edwards offers empty rhetoric and little more. (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 05:47 PM Response to Reply #24 |
38. BWAHAHAHA! "Empty rhetoric" built his poverty institute, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 06:05 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Empty Rhetoric built his campaign. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 06:08 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Deleted message |
Milo_Bloom
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 06:15 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. As if Edwards actually does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 06:24 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Deleted message |
Milo_Bloom
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 06:57 PM Response to Reply #45 |
53. I want to vote for the democratic candidate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 06:58 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Post #53 is pure rhetoric with nothing to back it up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 07:00 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Deleted message |
madmunchie
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 07:04 PM Response to Reply #54 |
262. Facts don't seem to make any difference to JE supporters, "PURE RHETORIC" is seemingly all they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphire Blue
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 11:19 PM Response to Reply #45 |
85. EXCELLENT questions, bobbolink, as is your comment above! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:08 PM Response to Reply #85 |
179. Deleted message |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:40 PM Response to Reply #179 |
199. These people attack Edwards at every turn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:44 PM Response to Reply #199 |
215. Which brings us right back to--what is the real agenda? What is the fear? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:36 PM Response to Reply #215 |
225. Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:18 PM Response to Reply #85 |
244. Not so excellent, it appears to have been deleted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 11:47 PM Response to Reply #42 |
92. which bankruptcy bill? the one that passed after he left the Senate??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:08 AM Response to Reply #92 |
103. Edwards voted on a couple of Bankrupcy bills; the wrong way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #92 |
165. The one he voted on. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:54 AM Response to Reply #41 |
111. Kucinich only one to end NAFTA, withdraw us from WTO and Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:13 PM Response to Reply #111 |
181. Edwards is the ONLY ONE striving to end poverty in the US! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hurricaneric
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:57 AM Response to Reply #40 |
149. You must know who the right candidate is then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 06:24 PM Response to Reply #24 |
46. You are absolutely correct. It's amazing how naive some folks are. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:52 AM Response to Reply #46 |
110. Kucinich is the best Candidate. Surpases them all. Won't stand down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:49 AM Response to Reply #110 |
167. Can't get elected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
25. Deleted message |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tech3149
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
26. Interesting straw poll on Thom Hartmann today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 04:01 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. Is this the Thom Hartmann being broadcast on Cspan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tech3149
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 06:26 PM Response to Reply #31 |
47. That's the same He has a daily broadcast Noon to 3;00 PM weekdays |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 05:40 PM Response to Reply #26 |
37. We need Edwards. Period. He can win and he can fix this country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 06:28 PM Response to Reply #37 |
48. I get a strong sense that Edwards is in it more for his own ego more than anything else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueJac
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:01 AM Response to Reply #48 |
139. Kind of like Hillary, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 07:43 PM Response to Reply #37 |
59. he's in it for John Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:02 AM Response to Reply #37 |
112. ANY democrat nominated will win this time. Kucinich is the real deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:06 AM Response to Reply #37 |
115. We need Kucinich. Period. He's the real deal.Strength thru Peace |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemDogs
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 08:03 PM Response to Reply #26 |
67. Great poll - Thanks (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:04 AM Response to Reply #26 |
113. He took less than 20calls..Couldn't get through with Kucinich vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
never_get_over_it
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:36 AM Response to Reply #26 |
135. I wrote down the totals: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colorado Progressive
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:23 AM Response to Reply #26 |
154. Thats exactly how I feel! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:29 PM Response to Reply #26 |
267. Good Thinking... I Watched Him When C-Span Covered Him & I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fiore280
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
27. Sorry but I think Edwards has told some high-impact lies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLib at work
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
28. I agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
44. Edwards is the worst choice. He'd be the first to bomb Iran. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snotcicles
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 06:40 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. What do you folks think of David Bonior? and do you think he would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 11:00 PM Response to Reply #51 |
79. don't ask awesome questions like that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:33 AM Response to Reply #79 |
125. Oh, you must be referring to the guy I've got on ignore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 11:07 PM Response to Reply #44 |
80. "He'd be the first to bomb Iran" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr. Strange
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:31 AM Response to Reply #44 |
142. Well, he may bomb Iran... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
52. K & R for Edwards! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
57. I don't go for his anti-Iran saber-rattling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 11:53 PM Response to Reply #57 |
94. carrots and sticks is saber rattling???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 12:20 AM Response to Reply #94 |
97. Check his AIPAC speech |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 12:26 AM Response to Reply #97 |
99. I know all about his AIPAC speech |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 12:35 AM Response to Reply #99 |
101. Then why are you both going along with the bullshit-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:28 AM Response to Reply #94 |
141. carpet of gold or carpet of bombs? carrot/stick? get it? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
58. If Edwards is the "only" choice, than you are telling us that we have no choice......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:35 AM Response to Reply #58 |
126. Vote for whoever you fucking want to vote for... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:33 AM Response to Reply #126 |
143. thank you, i fucking will. and it will NOT fucking be edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:36 AM Response to Reply #143 |
158. Exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:39 AM Response to Reply #143 |
159. It's a fucking title. Get over it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:02 PM Response to Reply #159 |
235. it's an incorrect and provocative title and ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:08 PM Response to Reply #235 |
239. How is it incorrect? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 09:37 AM Response to Reply #239 |
272. you didn't state it as an opinion. sheesh, you're dense. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
68. hmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 09:45 PM Response to Original message |
72. The OP is an incredible insult to the intelligence of the vast majority of DU'ers. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 10:59 PM Response to Reply #72 |
78. how shocking.... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:28 AM Response to Reply #72 |
123. That explains the 39 Recs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:52 AM Response to Reply #72 |
169. You're an incredible insult to MY intelligence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Witch
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
73. I agree with you, Mythsaje. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
75. I've been reading through this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
76. Obama: The REAL Choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porkrind
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
77. Thanks, but I'll stick with Kucinich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:08 AM Response to Reply #77 |
116. Kucinich says it and does it and doesn't back down. He's the one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 12:00 PM Response to Reply #116 |
173. He's the one who'd never have a chance... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deacon
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
84. he is the best choice, imo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
86. he's certainly the best choice that's running |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphire Blue
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
87. K&R - John Edwards is the ONLY choice for me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:10 AM Response to Reply #87 |
117. You really haven't taken a good look at Kucinich or his site. Open up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 12:02 PM Response to Reply #117 |
174. Kucinich is a good choice... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphire Blue
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:39 PM Response to Reply #117 |
186. Excuse me, but don't presume to tell me who I have or haven't taken a good look at. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:01 AM Response to Reply #87 |
152. Too bad for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colorado Progressive
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
88. Huh. After reading the thread I'm wondering why suddenly.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 07:30 AM Response to Reply #88 |
134. I don't give a shit that he's rich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colorado Progressive
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:27 AM Response to Reply #134 |
156. They all have flaws. I'm voting for whoever the D nom is. Enough Hitler already! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 11:41 PM Response to Original message |
89. K&R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
91. Edwards truly is a fine stateman, but I'm much more impressed with Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 12:34 AM Response to Reply #91 |
100. Edwards? Statesman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midwestern Democrat
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
93. I'm with Edwards all the way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Fri Sep-07-07 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
95. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
96. Crap... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snot
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
98. All I care about is, he voted to authorize the Iraq invasion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:11 AM Response to Reply #98 |
104. John Edwards was fortunate enough not only to vote for the IWR, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:43 AM Response to Reply #98 |
122. I can trump that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:21 AM Response to Original message |
105. Good, perhaps the best, but NOT the only. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:55 AM Response to Reply #105 |
129. We are, actually... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:38 AM Response to Reply #129 |
144. you said ONLY choice. now you're bactracking. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:41 AM Response to Reply #144 |
160. It was a title to attract attention... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:05 PM Response to Reply #160 |
238. obvious provocation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:10 PM Response to Reply #238 |
241. People have no reason to get "pissed off." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 09:32 AM Response to Reply #241 |
271. i don't know what the hell you're talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:44 AM Response to Original message |
106. He's on it...always just one step behind Kucinich...together they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:19 AM Response to Reply #106 |
118. Kucinich has voted right all the way down the line. Introduced legislature |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krj44
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:09 AM Response to Original message |
127. slap wes clark on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:22 AM Response to Reply #127 |
128. That's my dream ticket, actually... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 06:12 AM Response to Original message |
130. The besotted and befuddled have their candy-date: Johnny Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 07:08 AM Response to Original message |
132. I will vote for Dennis Kucinich thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hurricaneric
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:59 AM Response to Reply #132 |
151. Except he's not viable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman
![]() |
Mon Sep-10-07 06:57 AM Response to Reply #151 |
276. You are drinking the Right Wing kool aide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 07:19 AM Response to Original message |
133. "opportunist" sticks to him like velcro |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:42 AM Response to Reply #133 |
161. And that makes him different from the other candidates HOW? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NastyDiaper
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
136. He's a good choice. Certainly not the only choice on the menu. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogman
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
137. "Right or wrong" says it all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:44 AM Response to Reply #137 |
163. And that would be? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogman
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 12:55 PM Response to Reply #163 |
178. IWR, Patriot Act, war with Iran. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
138. "The only choice" hahaha Delusions of Grandeur |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnWxy
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
140. keeps his cool when hassled by Republican punks and their friends in the media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hurricaneric
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
147. Edwards is the man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrainGlutton
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
157. Kucinich has plenty of substance in his speeches too, you know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fabio
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
162. LOL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
172. I notice most of the worst detractors here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 12:11 PM Response to Reply #172 |
176. no, we are just voters that give a crap about the repercussions of bad decisions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:35 PM Response to Reply #176 |
196. I did expect some feedback... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #196 |
202. You erected the "ONLY CHOICE" monument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:01 PM Response to Reply #202 |
233. Point out where I said I spoke for anyone but myself... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:25 PM Response to Reply #233 |
247. Your thread title employing absolute superlatives begs rebuttal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
go west young man
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
177. Edwards-Gore and we're walking away with at least 65% of the vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:19 PM Response to Reply #177 |
183. Edwards-Gore? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
go west young man
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:28 PM Response to Reply #183 |
184. I would love to have Gore as the prez but I think the South is the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:41 PM Response to Reply #184 |
187. Oh, I don't know.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
go west young man
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:53 PM Response to Reply #187 |
189. Believe me I know Bush was installed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrspeeker
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
188. LOL! Yeah well cept for everyone else running |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:37 PM Response to Reply #188 |
197. Well, considering I'm speaking for myself and not anyone else... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gnvresident
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
190. Wake Up!- We need Edwards! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gaspee
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
191. I've made it through |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ripple
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:39 PM Response to Reply #191 |
198. It's not a hijack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:03 PM Response to Reply #198 |
204. I take issue with him being touted as the ONLY CHOICE -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ripple
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:26 PM Response to Reply #204 |
213. Agreed, particularly when the rationale has to do with terrorism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #213 |
214. This should be a no-brainer -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:32 PM Response to Reply #214 |
223. I'm Irish too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:04 PM Response to Reply #223 |
236. I will hold my elected officials accountable with my vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ripple
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:41 PM Response to Reply #236 |
254. Their record is the only thing tangible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:44 PM Response to Reply #254 |
257. Cheers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:33 PM Response to Reply #204 |
224. Where, precisely, did I claim to speak for anyone but myself? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:27 PM Response to Reply #224 |
248. your thread title for a start |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mutineer
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
200. The ONLY choice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #200 |
222. Where in the post as a whole did I claim to speak for anyone but myself? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 09:49 AM Response to Reply #222 |
273. you are so utterly clueless it makes me wonder... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rndmprsn
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
207. K+R... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
220. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
246. I bookmarked this other Edwards "miracle" to add to this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 07:38 PM Response to Reply #246 |
264. Here sweetie, another one to add....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Sat Sep-08-07 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
263. I'm sticking with Bill Richardson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
274. so now let's do the litmus test. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PresidentObama
![]() |
Sun Sep-09-07 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
275. I think you should change the thread title. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC