|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 12:50 PM Original message |
Thank you Code Pink for doing damage to Democratic candidates in GOP Districts! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
1. Your post has convinced me of something: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 12:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Really? You want our candidates hurt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crikkett
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 12:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. How about some candidates that don't have anything for code pink to attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:40 PM Response to Reply #12 |
55. Our candidates are local and there is nothing for Code Pink to attack.They have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:02 PM Response to Reply #55 |
89. So why are you blaming a fringe group that many of us are now forced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:12 PM Response to Reply #89 |
102. Nonsense! The real reasons are local issues and the war is NOT a local issue! Period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:44 PM Response to Reply #102 |
193. That's just the noise that they are offering today as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:51 PM Response to Reply #193 |
197. Thank you what a very nice and logical post.You are correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:57 PM Response to Reply #197 |
202. Really it's okay - As someone who once ran for office I understand the need to vent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justice
![]() |
Mon Sep-24-07 04:05 AM Response to Reply #102 |
411. so the war is not a real issue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slampoet
![]() |
Mon Sep-24-07 06:40 AM Response to Reply #102 |
415. And that is why you so-called Democrats are loosing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crikkett
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:27 PM Response to Reply #55 |
120. well that's what I get for skimming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chulanowa
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 06:19 PM Response to Reply #55 |
265. So because some dim people associate them with Democrats... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:05 PM Response to Reply #3 |
29. Guess what: the peace movement, and the citizenry, do not exist to help Dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:30 PM Response to Reply #29 |
44. But it should NOT exist to harm people who hzve NOTHING to do with the war! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:09 PM Response to Reply #44 |
235. Do you HONESTLY think that was their goal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:14 PM Response to Reply #235 |
236. Nope.I do not think Code Pink thinks about the consequences of their actions. They just do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:23 PM Response to Reply #236 |
242. Neither does Ann Coulter, or Sean Hannity... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 09:47 PM Response to Reply #242 |
296. Huh? Ann Coulter and Sean Hannity further the GOP agenda, they don't hurt it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 09:19 AM Response to Reply #296 |
340. It only makes no sense to you because of your perspective. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 09:48 PM Response to Reply #236 |
297. Ding, ding, ding! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 05:32 PM Response to Reply #44 |
391. WOW! Total disconnect. What the hell do you think elected officials' jobs are? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #29 |
155. Thank you. As someone who lives in war pig Jane Harman's district, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alstephenson
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:43 PM Response to Reply #3 |
58. If all it takes to "hurt our candidates" is a couple gals in pink tiaras, so be it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:00 PM Response to Reply #58 |
85. I disgaree with their methods and I was sickened to find myself having |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:07 PM Response to Reply #85 |
98. You fell for the distraction!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:12 PM Response to Reply #98 |
103. I did.I shouldn't have to! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:24 PM Response to Reply #103 |
117. You can control your own behavior. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:30 PM Response to Reply #117 |
128. Actually I did but what about all those that I am not going to be able to talk to? Hmm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:31 PM Response to Reply #128 |
130. What was carried? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:32 PM Response to Reply #130 |
132. The Code Pink Disruption! That was why people were talking about it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:31 PM Response to Reply #117 |
131. Logical advice...but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:35 PM Response to Reply #131 |
135. Oh my goodness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:37 PM Response to Reply #135 |
141. At least they didn't vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:41 PM Response to Reply #141 |
149. Apparently, it's the same thing ;-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cannabis_flower
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:30 PM Response to Reply #103 |
129. Whaaaaa... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:39 PM Response to Reply #129 |
143. I should have not have to deal with the distraction of CP before we address the issues! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:10 PM Response to Reply #3 |
100. Your statement claims facts not in evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #100 |
203. I said "potential " damage.Some elections are yet to be! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
23. Exactly...The ridicule factor here hurts Democrats, providing fodder for RW denigration.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:33 PM Response to Reply #23 |
133. Ye-ah, I would expect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:06 PM Response to Reply #133 |
303. hillary is part of this conversation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic
![]() |
Mon Sep-24-07 09:06 AM Response to Reply #303 |
419. from post 23 (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antiimperialist
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
26. I agree. Don't piss off conservatives, please! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:53 PM Response to Reply #26 |
198. She's not talking about Conservatives. She's talking about Moderates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #198 |
218. Thank you.Absolutely right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #198 |
227. All four of them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:15 PM Response to Reply #227 |
237. Most Indies in My state are Republican and most are moderates.They are the same! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 01:15 PM Response to Reply #237 |
348. Obviously we have a terminology issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:31 PM Response to Reply #227 |
244. Oh, moderate Republicans that are teetering on the edge of their party do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 09:51 PM Response to Reply #227 |
299. You know not what you talk about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:11 AM Response to Reply #299 |
320. Thank you AZBlue. You are correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:27 PM Response to Reply #1 |
125. Good! If I had some extra fucking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:40 PM Response to Reply #125 |
145. Well, you won't be getting any extra money soon either if we don't elect Dems locally! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #145 |
159. It's not the Dems fault |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
180. I am sorry, but how many Republicans are we trying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 09:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
286. Yeah me too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
2. Well we're stuck with it, so I also think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 12:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. But these are not the kind of people that listen to Limbaugh or Coulter! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
25. It's their party, they need to own them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:08 PM Response to Reply #8 |
99. Similarly, we're not all Code Pink... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downtown Hound
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
4. Funny you should say this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 12:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. I am talking about Local candidates in red states! And it was a bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downtown Hound
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 12:58 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. You're just not going to get over this are you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:31 PM Response to Reply #14 |
45. No.Because I saw good people being hurt by this yesterday! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alstephenson
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:47 PM Response to Reply #45 |
65. Maybe they SHOULD have something to do with the war.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:53 PM Response to Reply #65 |
71. They have positions but that is not relevent to the position they seek! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:09 PM Response to Reply #11 |
32. I don't see how Code Pink is our problem (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:10 PM Original message |
I urge everyone on the board to contribute to Code Pink. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudsue
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
107. Bingo! Someone else's politics of "fear" isn't going to persuade me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:53 PM Response to Reply #11 |
230. So national polling data indicates that Republicans are in deep trouble |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:17 PM Response to Reply #230 |
239. Our Democratic base is not enough to win in my state even if they all voted which they don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 06:17 PM Response to Reply #239 |
264. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 08:02 PM Response to Reply #264 |
275. Deleted message |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 09:12 PM Response to Reply #264 |
289. Kind of a long way to go to call her a liar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
5. Code Pink should be "in the pink" with all progressives. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
6. Deja vu?!? Haven't we been through this "fandango" a couple of days ago? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 07:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
273. by the same original poster, no less |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
7. Code Pink is NOT the Democratic Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 12:55 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. That is what I try to explain. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 12:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. But they are an Anti-war voice. I despise all warmongering candidates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
43. What is is about the word LOCAL that some do not understand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrispyQ
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:06 PM Response to Reply #43 |
95. Why are you holding these people's ignorance against Code Pink? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:16 PM Response to Reply #95 |
106. Why should I have to bother correcting a perception Code Pink created? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrispyQ
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:37 PM Response to Reply #106 |
142. Code Pink did not create these misperceptions, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:42 PM Response to Reply #142 |
150. Excuse me but every Code Pinker I know and I know many is a Dem and they frequently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:51 PM Response to Reply #150 |
154. If you mean your husband's campaigning events, I'm sure your Code Pink friends would be interested |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #154 |
164. Not an issue! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrispyQ
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #150 |
175. It's their right to do so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cannabis_flower
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:27 PM Response to Reply #150 |
179. Actually... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:45 PM Response to Reply #106 |
250. Because the Republicanites will always find something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 09:16 PM Response to Reply #43 |
290. Oh that's just complete bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:27 PM Response to Reply #290 |
315. Yes.The Election Board and the moderate repugs who had supported |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:37 PM Response to Reply #315 |
316. Three words... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:43 PM Response to Reply #290 |
318. Are you calling her a liar? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
153. Code Pink has many members who are Democrats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
10. did your republican friends see Ike Skelton threaten to prosecute them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. Yes, that was Oh, so, AUTHORITARIAN of him ... what a doll! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
91. Do you seriously think the average voter knows that Skelton is a Dem? Another thing that distracts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 09:19 PM Response to Reply #91 |
293. Bingo!! Yet you expect US to believe your local repukes know all about Code Pink!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
13. If your husband was smart, he would have run on an anti-code pink platform. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconocrastic
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:01 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. Damn the iceburgs, full speed ahead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:15 PM Response to Reply #13 |
172. That actually makes a kind of sense.As for the article.It was Blah!blah! blah!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:36 PM Response to Reply #172 |
247. Don't like the comments of our Dem congress folks, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glowing
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
16. Code Pink is not Democratic... It is a non-profit group that wants to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
17. Bawk, duc, duc, duc Bawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwk! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KurtNYC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:13 PM Response to Reply #17 |
104. Yes. Candidates with cloudy middle of the road stances fear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
18. And John Kerry's "botched joke" last fall was supposedly going to ruin our chances in the election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:02 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. The same criticism was leveled at the participants of "The Boston Tea Party" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:33 PM Response to Reply #24 |
46. a history lesson about the Boston Tea Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:41 PM Response to Reply #46 |
56. Clean for Gene was effective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:46 PM Response to Reply #56 |
62. the comparison is valid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:53 PM Response to Reply #62 |
72. plus it was 1968 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:54 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. their message was the same -- "end the war" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:58 PM Response to Reply #74 |
80. but your comparison is ridiculous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:59 PM Response to Reply #80 |
84. not in the slightest -its the message that matters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:50 PM Response to Reply #46 |
68. Too bizarro! But their costumes were bizarre none the less. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:03 PM Response to Reply #68 |
90. You must have attended different protests than I did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:18 PM Response to Reply #90 |
109. Those type of "off the cuff" value judgments reminds me of the conservatives during |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:22 PM Response to Reply #109 |
114. okay, now you're just blathering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:25 PM Response to Reply #114 |
118. That's just plain SAD. You've lost the argument, now deal with it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:27 PM Response to Reply #118 |
126. I'll take that as a concession that you have no response. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G
![]() |
Mon Sep-17-07 07:46 AM Response to Reply #46 |
397. Another bit of history |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:18 PM Response to Reply #18 |
37. What are "regular clothes"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:34 PM Response to Reply #37 |
49. People who want to be effective in the art of politics should do what it takes to be effective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:38 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. Yes, effective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:43 PM Response to Reply #53 |
59. Not exactly. LBJ lost. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:45 PM Response to Reply #53 |
60. Gene McCarthy won the New Hampshire primary, basically forcing LBJ out of the race |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:47 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. So how is this comparable to Code Pink? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:47 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. see post #62 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:54 PM Response to Reply #64 |
73. see post #63 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:46 PM Response to Reply #49 |
61. People who judge others on anything but their messages and actions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:48 PM Response to Reply #61 |
66. maybe so, but you can ignore the problem and be ineffective or work with reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:49 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Whose reality is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:51 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. so, you think that all the people who supported McCarthy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:55 PM Response to Reply #69 |
75. Wasn't that about the time that Elvis was only shown from the waist up and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:56 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. prize for non sequitur, irrelevant, and incomprehensible response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #76 |
86. OK I'll spell it out for you: THAT WAS A DIFFERENT TIME |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:05 PM Response to Reply #86 |
94. its not whether they are "scandalous" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:07 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. Well, we don't agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:56 PM Response to Reply #69 |
77. Which candidate is Code Pink supporting again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:58 PM Response to Reply #77 |
81. keep trying. To paraphrase a successful campaign, its the message stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #81 |
224. I'll keep trying until you answer my question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Mon Sep-17-07 09:42 AM Response to Reply #224 |
399. I've answered. You just don't like the answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
movonne
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
20. What is your problem with code pink??? and as far as the red |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:31 PM Response to Reply #20 |
219. So you're saying Saracat's husband is a blue dog? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
21. Who cares? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveJ
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
27. If your district wasn't filled with warmongers then this wouldn't be a problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:33 PM Response to Reply #27 |
48. So we should just not bother to run any candidates in red areas? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveJ
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #48 |
87. What's the difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:14 PM Response to Reply #87 |
105. Who is supporting war>? All the candidates I know are against it.But it is not a LOCAL issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stimbox
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:40 PM Response to Reply #105 |
146. Well then.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #146 |
166. I don't blame Code Pink for the stupidity of my neighbors! I blame Code Pink |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stimbox
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:12 PM Response to Reply #166 |
304. Why do you fall for the RW whisper machine? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:29 PM Response to Reply #27 |
216. Nice assumption there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
28. I'm sorry, but if you, your husband and local Democratic community |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:51 PM Response to Reply #28 |
70. My husband happens to be against the war.He has walked in anti war protests but he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:04 PM Response to Reply #70 |
93. And again I say, if you're having difficulty seperating yourself, your husband and the Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:27 PM Response to Reply #93 |
121. I find your comments out of line.Code Pink and many of their ilk need to be the ones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:40 PM Response to Reply #121 |
144. Whoops, there it is! That one word that gives your entire mindset away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #144 |
156. This is really pissing me off.My anti war credentials are better than most. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #156 |
171. I'm with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #156 |
174. Again, your own word choice betrays you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puglover
![]() |
Mon Sep-24-07 06:29 AM Response to Reply #144 |
414. Your post is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cannabis_flower
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:41 PM Response to Reply #121 |
148. The problemis not Code Pink... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:10 PM Response to Reply #148 |
167. But Code Pink Feeds the RW whisper machine! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cannabis_flower
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:39 PM Response to Reply #167 |
187. The RW whisper machine... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:41 PM Response to Reply #187 |
190. There is an element to truth to that ,but there is no reason for so called "progressives" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slampoet
![]() |
Mon Sep-24-07 06:43 AM Response to Reply #167 |
416. Don't be naive, they find something else if it weren't for pink and you know it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 09:55 PM Response to Reply #28 |
300. I'm not sure about saracat, but my concern is not with the Dems but the Reps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:20 PM Response to Reply #300 |
305. So is this any reason to damn Code Pink? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:33 PM Response to Reply #305 |
306. I'm not damning anyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:24 AM Response to Reply #300 |
324. Mine too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 08:29 PM Response to Reply #324 |
395. I could have sworn that's what you were saying, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
30. I pray you someday get to emigrate to a land free of your Republican masters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
31. Yes, let's let the Republicans define our base and our principles for us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:21 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. Maybe we need a new first amendment to a Democratic Constitution: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:37 PM Response to Reply #31 |
52. That is not true.He got a lot od support from moderate Dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
33. If the Republicans are not smart enough to distinguish between the Democratic Party and Code Pink |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jChicago
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
34. I agree saracat -- I cringed for the few seconds I heard it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
35. How could this OP's quote be considered supporting Democratic Values? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. I was quoting REPUBLICANS not Democrats!Of cxourse they can be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 09:57 PM Response to Reply #35 |
301. Sure, but it's a small minority of Americans that know he lied. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
36. I've experienced the same reaction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:27 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. If citizens expressing their politics are inconvenient for red state Dems, ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:36 PM Response to Reply #42 |
51. its not that they are expressing their politics, its the way they present themselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:07 PM Response to Reply #51 |
97. "its the way they present themselves" - WTF! These are protestors NOT debutantes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:19 PM Response to Reply #97 |
110. again. Tell that to the folks who went Clean for Gene and changed history |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:22 PM Response to Reply #110 |
115. You're hopeless. Enjoy your rigid judgments about people you know absolutely nothing about. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:27 PM Response to Reply #115 |
122. which people do I know nothing about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:35 PM Response to Reply #97 |
186. It's this kind of inflated rhetoric that's standing in our way, IMHO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:21 PM Response to Reply #186 |
211. "It's this messianic rhetoric that Code Pink" - that's RW slammin' at it's best! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:39 PM Response to Reply #211 |
223. Get elected to anything yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:48 PM Response to Reply #223 |
229. That's the point which truly escapes you. It's not about "getting elected" it's about "SERVING" your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:03 PM Response to Reply #229 |
232. The point which escapes you is you can't "serve" without being "elected." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #232 |
234. All I know is what I see here: A person who is rigid and judgmental - toward people who truly care. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:23 PM Response to Reply #234 |
243. "All I know is what I see here: A person who is rigid and judgmental - toward people who truly care" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:41 PM Response to Reply #243 |
249. No, I do regret my bluntness, but from years of addiction counseling, I serve my clients better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 08:11 PM Response to Reply #249 |
277. Why should I? You don't allow me to be "harsh" about Code Pink and their actions! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 08:31 PM Response to Reply #277 |
280. OK, then I hope you are able to make peace "with yourself" because your efforts to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:56 PM Response to Reply #36 |
255. The disdain for Code Pink and Michael Moore is just them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 08:14 PM Response to Reply #255 |
278. except the people I'm talking about don't listen to Rush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:06 PM Response to Reply #278 |
302. But have they actually SEEN a Michael Moore film, or are they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:59 PM Response to Reply #302 |
311. sure they have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:15 AM Response to Reply #311 |
322. So why are their criticisms in terms of "He's fat"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:26 AM Response to Reply #322 |
325. How do you know what paulk's relatives said about MM? Aren't you assuming a lot? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 09:51 AM Response to Reply #325 |
343. I wasn't referring to paulk's relatives but to right wingers in general |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 02:06 PM Response to Reply #343 |
357. Fine except in post 36 paulk makes it clear he is talking about his relatives! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Mon Sep-24-07 04:23 AM Response to Reply #311 |
412. Why is the GOP not worried about how Rush Limbaugh makes them look? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed-up
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
38. why are they repukes if :"They did not want to be associated with a bunch of crazies" * is INSANE nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
41. ROFLMAO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #41 |
226. I'm still trying to figure out what a "moderate republican" is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:47 PM Response to Reply #226 |
251. I'm still trying to figure out people's fascination with "moderates" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:47 PM Response to Reply #226 |
308. No, they're the ones who ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
47. K&R...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
50. "I live in a Republican dominated District" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:39 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. Yes.Because they helped create a negative preception of our local candidates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:43 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. Perception by whom? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:57 PM Response to Reply #57 |
79. Thank you.People like you brought us George Bush! Maybe you don't care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:04 PM Response to Reply #79 |
92. That's highly offensive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:10 PM Response to Reply #92 |
101. "people like you" ... yes, us little people who don't make the political elites' cocktail soirees. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:35 PM Response to Reply #92 |
134. If the shoe fits! I find it offensive you think more of your own |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:36 PM Response to Reply #134 |
139. Tell me, I bet you wouldn't be caught dead in white shoes after labor day? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #139 |
160. I NEVER wear white shoes.Ever! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:49 PM Response to Reply #134 |
152. If it wasn't Code Pink, it would be Michael Moore or the Dixie Chicks or Bill Maher or any one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:05 PM Response to Reply #152 |
162. Actually that is kind of cute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:12 PM Response to Reply #152 |
168. Yeah, they tried to vilify Michael Moore when he made Fahrenheit 911 although it was true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:35 PM Response to Reply #92 |
136. More logical advice.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cannabis_flower
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #79 |
177. No that's not true.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:53 PM Response to Reply #177 |
199. I was surprised we almost won.He are running again.No sour grapes here! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:58 PM Response to Reply #57 |
83. Well put. Amen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:31 PM Response to Reply #83 |
184. What working class people? Who's "us". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #184 |
209. US? We are what you "Reagan Democrats" seemingly slam at every opportunity = LIBERALS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #209 |
212. How you inferred from my post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:29 PM Response to Reply #212 |
215. Read your post again. Especially the lines about the skill of Saint Reagan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #215 |
222. Nevermind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:19 AM Response to Reply #184 |
323. That is absolutely correct! And that was how we "lost " those people.That is wh y many of the unions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:56 PM Response to Reply #54 |
78. Did your local candidates appear with members of Code Pink? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 01:58 PM Response to Reply #78 |
82. Of course not.But all are againt the war and the association is being made by those that do not know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
88. Thank You DC Dems For Allowing Code Pink To Lead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
108. Sorry saracat, any candidate who loses because of Code Freaking Pink is too weak to run for office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
111. CodePink = NutCase(s) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:21 PM Response to Reply #111 |
112. Code Pink = American Patriots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:22 PM Response to Reply #111 |
113. Is it wearing a costume that makes one a nutcase? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:24 PM Response to Reply #113 |
116. For the record, I don't think that they are nut cases. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:25 PM Response to Reply #113 |
119. Their "message" aka shreeks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:27 PM Response to Reply #119 |
123. So that makes them insane? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:27 PM Response to Reply #119 |
124. We'll remember all this disrespect when the 2008 election comes around. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:36 PM Response to Reply #124 |
137. Yeah and you will elect a Republican! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:42 PM Response to Reply #137 |
151. NO, our illustrious leaders within the ruling elite Democratic Party will have, once again, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:57 PM Response to Reply #151 |
157. Say one of you dirty "little wage slaves" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #157 |
158. Are you saying politicians are our bosses? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #158 |
163. ShortnFiery referred to herself as a "dirty little wage slave" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #163 |
169. You were pretty clearly making an analogy between an employee talking to a boss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:22 PM Response to Reply #151 |
178. I am one of those "dirty little wage slaves"! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:16 PM Response to Reply #178 |
208. Somehow, IMO, you have disconnected with us "little people" whose Moms dress us funny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:34 PM Response to Reply #208 |
220. Somehow you have "disconnected" with those of us whose Mom's told us to respect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:57 PM Response to Reply #220 |
231. Too funny! This is no time for arbitrary "Miss Manners" rules. They're YOUR inane and rigid laws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #231 |
233. Really? You don't act like it! Why must I respect Code Pink's actions? Why don't you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:22 PM Response to Reply #233 |
241. Not true. I would not "dress up" but I have enough respect for their goal to stop the war that I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:50 PM Response to Reply #241 |
252. "Personal ambitions? " Obviously you have absolutely no idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:41 PM Response to Reply #241 |
317. Aren't you assuming an awful lot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:20 PM Response to Reply #124 |
176. Havin' a bad day? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:15 PM Response to Reply #176 |
207. No, but the centrists have kicked us liberals in the teeth long enough and then DEMAND that we vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 08:17 PM Response to Reply #207 |
279. "what political elite cocktail circuit" ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:28 PM Response to Reply #111 |
127. What exactly did Codepink do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:41 PM Response to Reply #111 |
147. Code Pink = People who f*cking care enough to poke a stick in Bush's eyes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MelissaB
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
138. How many people watch CSPAN or saw Code Pink there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ripple
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:05 PM Response to Reply #138 |
161. That was my first thought, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:29 PM Response to Reply #161 |
181. Nope All our local newscasts carried a clip Fox played it up big! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ripple
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:26 PM Response to Reply #181 |
214. Ah, well Fox would, I suppose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #214 |
384. Why CP needs to be given the middle finger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
140. Don't blame poor candidates on Code Pink |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:52 PM Response to Reply #140 |
253. Legislative candidates don't run on the war! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 09:16 PM Response to Reply #253 |
291. So the half a trillion dollars spent on the war have no effect on local programs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nealmhughes
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
165. This entire thread reminds me of my continued analogy to the activists in the DP as being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #165 |
217. My husband hasn't lost.This wasn't his election night.And this was a non -partisan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
170. Deleted message |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:13 PM Response to Reply #170 |
312. Calling a fellow DUer a liar is never cool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
173. Let the others flame, I understand what you're saying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:31 PM Response to Reply #173 |
183. Thank you. They just do not get it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:42 PM Response to Reply #183 |
191. Though I don't always agree with you, you're one of the most tenacious posters on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:23 PM Response to Reply #183 |
213. Posts are overwhelmingly against what you said, but WE'RE the ones who don't get it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:58 PM Response to Reply #213 |
319. Apparently Jon Stewart , unlike you, "gets it" ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:26 AM Response to Reply #319 |
326. yeah, quite a few posts from the same 2 or 3 people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:31 AM Response to Reply #326 |
328. As are the opposition.But Jon Stewart is another person! So there are some of us out there that do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VLC
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:37 AM Response to Reply #328 |
329. Of course, and you are entitled to that opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 08:13 AM Response to Reply #328 |
335. Hello!?! Jon Stewart is a comedian. He uses any political news to spin "humor" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 01:48 PM Response to Reply #335 |
353. He admits that the show reflects his own views.In a humorous vein. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 02:02 PM Response to Reply #353 |
356. Not exactly, "the show" is a TEAM Effort, not necessarily Stewart's personal views. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 02:11 PM Response to Reply #356 |
359. You must not have seen his interview. The"team reflects "his" view. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 02:32 PM Response to Reply #359 |
362. Hello? The daily show is "a team effort" - that does not equate ONLY to Jon's views. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:10 PM Response to Reply #362 |
371. Read to comprehend.The "team " is reflective of his views.He has said so.I believe him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:11 PM Response to Reply #371 |
372. As my Karate coach would say, "There's no 'I' in TEAM" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:34 PM Response to Reply #183 |
245. We get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:40 PM Response to Reply #173 |
188. If the Dems would just become neo-cons, the red-staters would love them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:43 PM Response to Reply #188 |
192. Yeah, too bad we've got people like Claire McCaskill and Jon Tester in the Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:49 PM Response to Reply #192 |
196. Don't understand your point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:08 PM Response to Reply #196 |
206. I'm trying to point out there are Dems that red-staters will back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:19 PM Response to Reply #206 |
210. And I'm saying Dems have gradually become corrupt and worthless by following that line of thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 07:21 PM Response to Reply #210 |
271. Let me ask you a question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 07:24 PM Response to Reply #271 |
272. I've seen this question posed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 09:22 PM Response to Reply #271 |
294. They've been moving to the right since Reagan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:51 PM Response to Reply #271 |
386. The entire political establishment has been moving to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Mon Sep-24-07 04:31 AM Response to Reply #271 |
413. They never were, but things have gotten worse not better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:45 PM Response to Reply #188 |
194. No one is trying to appear not liberal! Geez.Wearing a pink crown has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:48 PM Response to Reply #194 |
195. Isn't opposing the war liberal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:54 PM Response to Reply #195 |
200. Who doesn't oppose the war? Can't you oppose the war and not support Code Pink? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:59 PM Response to Reply #200 |
204. Who doesn't oppose the war? All the Pukes and an awful lot of Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #204 |
221. I do not know any of my Local or Federal Dems who do not oppose the war! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #221 |
225. That's a good thing. But you DO know that Dems in congress haven't insisted on a time-table |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 09:25 PM Response to Reply #194 |
295. Criticizing those who try to stop the war makes one suspect, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:24 PM Response to Reply #295 |
314. So if I tried to stop the war by pulling my pants down and whistling "We shall overcome" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solon
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 08:43 AM Response to Reply #314 |
336. No offense, but yes your credibility is in question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 01:57 PM Response to Reply #336 |
354. You're mistaking me for the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MelissaB
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 08:33 PM Response to Reply #173 |
281. I've only been out of a red state 6 weeks, so I do get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 11:14 PM Response to Reply #173 |
313. A Christian friend of mine feels the same way about Pat Robertson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
182. Oh puhleeze! I am sick-to-death of the Protest Police and their fashion citations! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
185. Politics over carnage.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DancingBear
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
189. Now THIS is funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
here_is_to_hope
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
201. OMG! OH NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:01 PM Response to Reply #201 |
205. I also capitalize Repugs ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
228. aw jeez.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
238. Good luck to your Husband, but he and you should hope to understand that Bush's War |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
240. Oh yes, I agree with you completely... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:56 PM Response to Reply #240 |
256. Not THOSE Republicans. THESE Repubicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:59 PM Response to Reply #256 |
258. Those republicans buy into rightwing mighty wurlitzer spin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 06:06 PM Response to Reply #258 |
260. They are enough to swing an election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 06:07 PM Response to Reply #260 |
262. That's what I mean though, about the spin... if they don't buy it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 07:37 PM Response to Reply #262 |
274. Thing is, what is the 50 state strategy all about if not being competitive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 09:28 AM Response to Reply #274 |
341. I just don't know if anyone who believes spin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
246. Code Pink is not a Democratic organization. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
248. Instead of worrying about how to win over Republicans, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:54 PM Response to Reply #248 |
254. We have tried that in the party for 30 years! It doesn't work! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:58 PM Response to Reply #254 |
257. What? Which 30 years are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 06:07 PM Response to Reply #257 |
261. The Dem establishment has made the false assumption |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 06:08 PM Response to Reply #261 |
263. Well obviously that's what it is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 05:35 PM Response to Reply #257 |
392. THANK YOU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 05:59 PM Response to Reply #248 |
259. The lunch counter sit down was one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 06:26 PM Response to Reply #259 |
266. Heaven forbid that those Blacks and Women don't know what is "dignified" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 06:32 PM Response to Reply #266 |
267. Do you have some kind of reading comprehension problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 06:41 PM Response to Reply #267 |
268. No, I'm making a point that NOT all EFFECTIVE protests need be "dignified" -YOUR arbitrary standard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 07:09 PM Response to Reply #266 |
269. Code Pink isn't even in the same league as the likes of Rosa Parks or MLK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 07:16 PM Response to Reply #269 |
270. I never claimed they were, but they do serve a valuable purpose ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #270 |
276. They only serve to make the GOP look good! They defeat their own purpose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 08:33 PM Response to Reply #276 |
282. Code Pink is democracy, remember democracy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 08:40 PM Response to Reply #282 |
283. I am paralyzed by fear because I think Code Pink look like clowns and reflect badly on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 08:50 PM Response to Reply #283 |
284. IMO, the only people who use Code Pink as an excuse to vote republican are EXACTLY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 09:18 PM Response to Reply #283 |
292. Deleted message |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:40 PM Response to Reply #292 |
307. Yer mama dresses you funny and she never, ever liked you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 09:04 PM Response to Reply #276 |
285. They serve to make the GOP look good? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 01:25 PM Response to Reply #276 |
350. "They only serve to make the GOP look good!" Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 09:57 AM Response to Reply #269 |
344. No, they're more like the women's sufferage movement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:11 PM Response to Reply #344 |
374. history lesson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Mon Sep-24-07 08:26 AM Response to Reply #248 |
418. That's the ticket |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
287. Your beef should be with A.N.S.W.E.R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:14 AM Response to Reply #287 |
321. I do not care for them either but ANSWER was not what people were talking about! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
288. Republicans who demean a group of Americans who are exercising |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
298. Wow, that is a huge coincidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smalll
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
309. Serious, sober, and eloquent the way only truth can be - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Wed Sep-12-07 10:56 PM Response to Reply #309 |
310. Amen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 09:10 AM Response to Reply #310 |
339. Here's a double barreled "Dose of Truth" for you - NOT dignified nor sober. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:11 PM Response to Reply #339 |
373. Those people deserve better than self-righteous clowns in tiaras |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Reterr
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
327. Huh-their reaction seems extremely illogical at best |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 01:49 AM Response to Reply #327 |
330. What makes you think most voters are "educated" ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 02:57 AM Response to Original message |
331. Why are you defending the man that Admiral Fallon described as "an ass-kissing little chickenshit"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:52 AM Response to Reply #331 |
332. Where do you see that she's defending the man? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:52 PM Response to Reply #332 |
387. By attacking Petraeus' critics, she is defending the lying general |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Mon Sep-17-07 09:48 AM Response to Reply #387 |
400. you've got to be kidding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 06:58 AM Response to Original message |
333. DU is full of people who'd rather fight than win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmp
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 09:43 AM Response to Reply #333 |
342. Dems "won" in '06 ... what good did it do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #333 |
385. Some would rather fight than concede on everything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solon
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 07:13 AM Response to Original message |
334. I say the OP is full of shit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
337. "Truth Doesn't Need a Pink Tiara." Post of the day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 08:52 AM Response to Reply #337 |
338. Yes, but they sure snagged your attention. I'd rather "be pink" than "yellow bellied" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 10:04 AM Response to Reply #338 |
345. Sigh. I wouldn't presume to tell you or ANYONE at DU "who to vote for". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 11:16 AM Response to Reply #345 |
347. "I haven't begun to figure out yet who *I* plan to vote for." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 01:29 PM Response to Reply #347 |
351. Wow. Psychoanalyzing over an Internet Board! And a person you have never met |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 01:36 PM Response to Reply #347 |
352. More of the grossly presumptuous and wild non-sequitors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 01:57 PM Response to Reply #352 |
355. You know, I understand that the truth hurts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
346. I remembered something last night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #346 |
349. "all politics is local" and local politics shape your lives more than DC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 02:07 PM Response to Reply #349 |
358. There has to be something MORE to all the hate you spew toward Code Pink than is apparent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 02:23 PM Response to Reply #358 |
360. I don't hate Code Pink.I dislike their actions and how they reflect on others. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 02:28 PM Response to Reply #360 |
361. With respect,, every one of your posts within this thread is dripping with HATRED for Code Pink. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 02:39 PM Response to Reply #361 |
363. Would you like me to point out the "hate" spewing from almost all of your posts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 02:44 PM Response to Reply #363 |
365. No, it's not hatred exactly, it's resentment toward "Serial Mom" personas who wish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:07 PM Response to Reply #365 |
367. I dictate to NO one.I have an opinion and it is as valid as yours. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:09 PM Original message |
Well, your arbitrary definitions of what poses a dignified vs. non-dignified behavior |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
379. People in glass houses ought not to throw stones.I have said it before.Do you have a mirror? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:09 PM Response to Reply #365 |
370. No she's just presenting an unpopular opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #370 |
376. What bothers her is it isn't unpopular with "everyone"'! There are quite a few posters supporting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:15 PM Response to Reply #376 |
378. How Impolite to talk such smack! What would mother think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:24 PM Response to Reply #378 |
382. Yes it is impolite to notice that you are not the only one with an opinion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #382 |
383. I will admit that I greatly resent it when people attempt to DEMAND how others should behave ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:57 PM Response to Reply #383 |
388. See whats funny is I don't like it either when people DEMAND to control how I think! I am late. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #388 |
389. Sincere best regards. Yes, opinions are cool but demands on behavior ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 02:39 PM Response to Reply #361 |
364. I see Karl Rove left you his playbook, how nice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 02:46 PM Response to Reply #364 |
366. How lovely of you to say. Would you pass the finger sandwiches? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #366 |
368. Certainly but you must remove your tiara while eating at the table! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:12 PM Response to Reply #368 |
375. Only if you promise to put those scissors away? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:15 PM Response to Reply #375 |
377. I can't stay.I must be off to the "political cocktail circuit" you say I belong to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:17 PM Response to Reply #377 |
380. I'm so relieved that you never wear white shoes - since it's after Labor Day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:19 PM Response to Reply #380 |
381. Never.Even before.So tacky you know! Halston preached one should always wear beige |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #358 |
369. She hates America too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
390. Since Moderate Democrats helped start the war that they're protesting, I doubt they give a shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
393. thank you code pink |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Mon Sep-17-07 09:35 AM Response to Reply #393 |
398. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Tue Sep-18-07 02:29 PM Response to Reply #393 |
401. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy
![]() |
Thu Sep-13-07 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
394. They R makin Me and Rupert Look Bad! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Fri Sep-14-07 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
396. why not run as a Republican or as a Con-Dem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Tue Sep-18-07 02:42 PM Response to Reply #396 |
402. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
az_sigo
![]() |
Mon Sep-24-07 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
403. please forgive my interjection... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Thu Sep-27-07 12:39 PM Response to Reply #403 |
420. welcome to DU brother |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad
![]() |
Mon Sep-24-07 12:39 AM Response to Original message |
404. Aren't you one of those who get on Code Pink's case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moses2SandyKoufax
![]() |
Mon Sep-24-07 12:59 AM Response to Reply #404 |
405. Good ideas ProudDad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo
![]() |
Mon Sep-24-07 01:31 AM Response to Reply #404 |
406. Perhaps because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moses2SandyKoufax
![]() |
Mon Sep-24-07 01:56 AM Response to Reply #406 |
407. And "ebracing" the right wing ideology has?????? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad
![]() |
Mon Sep-24-07 02:26 AM Response to Reply #406 |
409. How do you know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Mon Sep-24-07 02:14 AM Response to Original message |
408. What did they see Code Pink do which "revolted" them? NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
candymarl
![]() |
Mon Sep-24-07 03:45 AM Response to Original message |
410. See John Kerry 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
erpowers
![]() |
Mon Sep-24-07 07:58 AM Response to Original message |
417. Read the Newspaper-Ask Them Some Questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC