|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 09:41 AM Original message |
This 'progressive' fad is starting to really irk me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stargazer99
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
1. liberal? progressive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
2. I like to refer to myself as an Informed Voter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 09:46 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I am with you on that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
4. Far from being new, it's been in use since the late 19th century |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 12:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
22. Fine, let me ask you this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmp
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
5. Why not just "socialist" ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 10:06 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. You missed the boat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmp
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 10:27 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. "The public holds the liberal brand in low esteem because" ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 10:28 AM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Personally, if they'd start fighting for the policies, I'm more than willing to give up any label. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 08:34 AM Response to Reply #6 |
41. A good reason to like the term "progressive". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:52 AM Response to Reply #41 |
44. I don't dispute the cleverness of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 10:56 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Well, what I DON'T see is the RW using the switch of terms against us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 02:57 PM Response to Reply #46 |
52. That was not a war we lost, it was one we didn't fight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progdonkey
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 10:20 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. maybe this is a stupid example, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
7. "Progressive" today is defined in two opposite ways, unfortunately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 10:20 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Can't argue that. Good points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 10:30 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. Ditto. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
8. It is not a fad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 10:16 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. I think you just got co-opted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 10:48 AM Response to Reply #9 |
15. I've consciously self-identified as a progressive since at least May 2003 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
16. We can (and should) take back the word 'liberal' but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 12:28 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. Wanting to win RIGHT NOW is why we lost the name |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 12:45 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. I disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 02:41 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. I don't entirely disagree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 03:04 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. It's been a pet peeve of mine... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
17. What It Is... Is BUSINESS Period!! Selling The "Product" Is All That Matters! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PatSeg
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
18. Well the flip side is Conservative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
19. Being a "progressive" is a fad for some candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
themaguffin
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
20. Progressive is NOT new |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 12:22 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. The use of the term by modern Democrats is new |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
24. Yeah, let's not make any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
27. K&R! Proud liberal here. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 02:43 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Same here. I don't judge "progressives" but I refuse to use it - I'm a dyed in the wool - LIBERAL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Same here-nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
32. Interesting polling results on the subject (Rasmussen) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 05:07 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. That's why we should take every step to call |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 08:17 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. I'm all for that. That's called fighting back. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
34. That headline could be an onion story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Tue Sep-25-07 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
36. I still consider myself a "moderate" - the country has moved on to "right wing wacko' beyond me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 01:37 AM Response to Original message |
37. proud liberal here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 07:53 AM Response to Original message |
38. I use the term 'progressive' because it is more accurate on a global sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 08:07 AM Response to Original message |
39. I want a Libertine victory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
40. Is progressive a term being used adding value to liberal political philosophy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:54 AM Response to Reply #40 |
45. Just my opinion, Maribelle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #45 |
48. Everywhere else in the world 'liberal' economics means something different from inside the U.S. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #48 |
54. That makes sense to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #40 |
51. Many times, it detracts from LIBERAL political philosophy - which stands on it's own very well. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
42. Yeah, it's sort of like that "telephone" fad that undermined the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 09:50 AM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Here's the response your post deserves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 11:34 AM Response to Reply #43 |
47. Maybe a better analogy is when my dad used to call my phonograph... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 02:45 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. All name changes are not equal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 04:06 PM Response to Reply #49 |
56. Are you saying "liberal" philosophy hasn't evolved? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 06:29 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. NO, I am saying that ain't the reason for the name change-nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
50. self delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Steve_in_California
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
53. So long as people persist in defining what lay ahead as a "fight" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
55. Many Democrats put their tails between their legs like a beaten |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norrin Radd
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
58. Hey! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norrin Radd
![]() |
Wed Sep-26-07 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
59. It's good, because they normally can say that "conservative" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 17th 2024, 08:14 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC