|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:37 AM Original message |
I'm reconsidering my support of Clinton in light of her recent ludicrous idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
1. A chicken in everey pot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terisan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:58 AM Response to Reply #1 |
25. A sensible plan, superior to bank loans for education which is a bank welfare program. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #25 |
127. A better plan is Universal FREE Education... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norrin Radd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 04:27 AM Response to Reply #127 |
136. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dugggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 11:26 AM Response to Reply #127 |
151. Universal college for ONLY those who qualify |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 11:45 AM Response to Reply #151 |
152. AND FREE Universal Remedial and Qualifying Programs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
2. Trouble in Hillary land. Clinton's losing support among the anti-baby bloc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 06:43 PM Response to Reply #2 |
117. You know what? There are a lot of single and/or childless people in this country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
123. Anit-baby? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
3. One would think voting "yes" on the Kyl-Lieberman amendment -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:40 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. That amendment was modified. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:48 AM Response to Reply #4 |
14. that vote was deja vu upside the head |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:55 AM Response to Reply #14 |
21. I would like to see Congress come out with stronger resolutions calling for diplomacy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:00 AM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Although the votes were different in magnitude -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:43 AM Response to Reply #21 |
50. I think Atomic Kitten is right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:40 AM Response to Reply #14 |
49. I object! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paparush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 08:05 AM Response to Reply #14 |
144. DING! DING! DING! We have a winner! NO DEMOCRAT should have voted for that shite! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:31 AM Response to Reply #4 |
46. It is still a signal that the top 5 Democrats and top 2 Republicans on the SFRC did not want sent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 11:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
128. Modified or not, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capn Sunshine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
94. Yes, one would think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 07:49 AM Response to Reply #94 |
142. Correct... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
124. One of many for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 07:07 PM Response to Reply #124 |
154. that vote was a red flag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freefall (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 05:21 AM Response to Reply #3 |
137. Exactly. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
5. noooo. Please! Stay! LOL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:42 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. What do you think of this idea? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:43 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Much like single payer health care. Neither has much of a chance in getting through Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:44 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. So why does she come out supporting it? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:45 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. the same reason all politicians come out supporting pie-in-the-sky ideas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:46 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Well, I agree to a point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:51 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. here's a knee slapper for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:00 AM Response to Reply #17 |
28. I actually agree with that idea. Why does it not have a chance? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:05 AM Response to Reply #28 |
33. So, because you agree with it, you think it has a chance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:25 AM Response to Reply #33 |
41. boy you have no problem in compromising integrity for votes do you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:27 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. what does that have to to with what I wrote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:45 AM Response to Reply #43 |
51. Pie in the sky ideas to get votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 04:14 PM Response to Reply #51 |
112. I said nothing of the sort. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #41 |
109. They would have to have integrity in the first place to be able to compromise it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terisan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:00 AM Response to Reply #10 |
26. Such cynicism. This is a sensible, very do-able proposal. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:03 AM Response to Reply #26 |
31. Sensible, yes. Can it make it through Congress? Doubtful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:18 AM Response to Reply #31 |
39. Of course it can. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 04:00 AM Response to Reply #5 |
134. Face it, pal, this is HUGH!!!!! I'm SERIES!!!11 She's TOAST!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cobalt1999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
7. I agree it is a stupid idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
11. It's a bond for the future |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:49 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Why should we be subsidizing home ownership? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:54 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. So disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:56 AM Response to Reply #15 |
22. you're ON to something here! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slick8790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:03 AM Response to Reply #22 |
30. Home ownership is slightly different than public education, no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:07 AM Response to Reply #30 |
34. owning a home and going to school are different things, but both play a role in the poverty cycle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:29 AM Response to Reply #34 |
44. Admit it , wyldie- Her idea sucks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 04:17 PM Response to Reply #44 |
113. Deleted message |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 11:51 PM Response to Reply #113 |
130. Oh dear wyld- you are so wrong, but I still admire you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 07:35 AM Response to Reply #130 |
141. you're approach to politics is like a teen's drooling over Andy Gibb in TigerBeat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:33 AM Response to Reply #34 |
47. And There Is This, Mr. Wolf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:49 AM Response to Reply #47 |
53. Hillary and her advisors are ALL about politics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:55 AM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Thats just an overly cynical view |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #53 |
58. That Is True, Ma'am, Of Anyone Seriously Contending For The Office Of President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #47 |
57. True of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 11:29 AM Response to Reply #57 |
60. That Is Part Of the Point Of The Proposal, Sir |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 11:57 AM Response to Reply #60 |
66. Exactly right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 05:56 AM Response to Reply #47 |
138. would you be surprised Mr. Magistrate if this proposal was met with ridicule from elements of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:05 PM Response to Reply #22 |
89. Why have a public education system, people should be responsible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:11 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. your funny. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:00 PM Response to Reply #15 |
87. Because if you don't subsidize, kids suffer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:04 PM Response to Reply #15 |
88. We subsidize companies, why can't we subsidize homes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamjoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #11 |
68. Not Cash |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
13. you should vote for the republican nominee who will be against the idea probably nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:50 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Or, find a Democratic candidate who is against the idea. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
18. I'm wondering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terisan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
20. This is a good idea for discussion. A $5000 bond posted at birth and growing interest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:57 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. shhh! You're hurting the "progressive"/Republican Coalition Against Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:09 PM Response to Reply #20 |
90. Yes, reduce the birth rate by reducing poverty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 06:46 PM Response to Reply #20 |
118. "I don't see people making decisions to have a child based upon this account" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
23. Didn't it bother you that she voted for the Lieberman Amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:01 AM Response to Reply #23 |
29. You make a good point there in your last paragraph. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #23 |
81. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
32. The last I heard, she backed away from that statement... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cobalt1999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:11 AM Response to Reply #32 |
35. I expected better of her campaign though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:14 AM Response to Reply #35 |
38. I thought it was pretty lame myself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 11:48 PM Response to Reply #32 |
129. A Trial Balloon.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pretzel4gore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
36. HC another time waster for bush.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MessiahRp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
37. The way inflation has gone the past 30 years... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glowing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
40. This argument is stupid... in every developed nation the birth rates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ldf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:55 AM Response to Reply #40 |
55. great, let's encourage even MORE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glowing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #55 |
59. I didn't say $5000.00 for every kid is such a great thing... personally, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 08:51 PM Response to Reply #59 |
121. Mexican women in the 1970s were still having 6-7 children each, and most |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:19 PM Response to Reply #55 |
97. darned constitution, letting those little babies from poor families be citizens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 08:02 AM Response to Reply #55 |
143. Well, fuck, let's combat illegal immigration by cancelling all social programs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
42. Well, you won't see me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
45. Cal, there is still time to come back to Obama land. We are waiting for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:34 AM Response to Reply #45 |
48. Cal, watch out I think I saw a puff of smoke and a slightly evil grin! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
52. Are you basing your knowledge on the "ludicrous idea" from DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avrdream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:17 PM Response to Reply #52 |
122. I would love that link as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
56. What the heck are you thinking? It is extremely odd how you change positions that quickly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 12:53 PM Response to Reply #56 |
78. LOL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:23 PM Response to Reply #78 |
102. Don't be a baby, politicians take your vote for granted or they take others for granted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
61. For the very reasons you state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas_Kat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 11:54 AM Response to Reply #61 |
63. Since Obama and Dodd co-sponsored a bill (S.970) in March with the exact same language |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 12:27 PM Response to Reply #63 |
72. Good to know, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 12:41 PM Response to Reply #63 |
73. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 12:50 PM Response to Reply #63 |
76. I believe Obama supported that bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:25 PM Response to Reply #63 |
104. That's the whole point, it is a Democratic-sounding idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
62. Probably my last comment on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 12:52 PM Response to Reply #62 |
77. Good point. I will take that into consideration. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginchinchili (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
64. I think it's pandering. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:30 PM Original message |
Driving up the deficit to help kids? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
65. We're also going to have to pay for the *!@%$!!! war in Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
67. The Dollar Amount is Reminiscent of George McGovern's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 12:09 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. Not really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:20 PM Response to Reply #67 |
100. It's More "Politically Defensible" Than McGovern's Plans Because It Goes To Kids And Not Adults |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 03:55 PM Response to Reply #100 |
111. Thank You for the Correction on the MoveOn Vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 08:18 AM Response to Reply #67 |
145. To elaborate on your points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #145 |
153. I Agree That the Amount Pales in Comparison |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElizabethDC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
70. Well, while I don't have a problem with this idea, it's apparently not an official policy proposal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
71. Weren't you an Obama supporter before Wes Clark endorsed Hillary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 12:49 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. Where is Buffy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 12:50 PM Response to Reply #71 |
75. Yes. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 12:59 PM Response to Reply #75 |
79. Come on back! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:13 PM Response to Reply #75 |
93. This idea could have been offered by Edwards or Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:18 PM Response to Reply #93 |
96. But it wasn't. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:32 PM Response to Reply #96 |
107. corrected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 03:01 PM Response to Reply #107 |
110. Got a link to the "idea" he signed onto? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
80. In The Larger Scheme Of Things It's A Fluff Proposal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:28 PM Response to Reply #80 |
105. Yes, if only people who could afford kids could have them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
82. Ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
83. Giving money to children, how un-Democratic ;) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:32 PM Response to Reply #83 |
125. I agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
84. This has got to be a joke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:12 PM Response to Reply #84 |
92. She Opposed The Bankruptcy Bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:17 PM Response to Reply #92 |
95. Please let ontheissues.org know that, they state otherwise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:20 PM Response to Reply #95 |
99. Thats how I remembered it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:20 PM Response to Reply #92 |
98. And Mentata.com which also says she voted FOR it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:24 PM Response to Reply #92 |
103. Here are the ACTUAL facts on the Bankrupcy Bill and Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:30 PM Response to Reply #103 |
106. Thanks, good info there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exultant Democracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 12:15 AM Response to Reply #84 |
131. K&R just for this post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
85. I haven't heard one idea from her that I DO like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElizabethDC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:00 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. This sounds like a Republican proposal to you!? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 10:39 AM Response to Reply #86 |
148. no. this sounds like a gimmick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:21 PM Response to Reply #85 |
101. her proposals are similar to both Edwards and Obama, do you feel the same about them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:32 PM Response to Reply #101 |
108. the same but slightly less so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 08:21 AM Response to Reply #85 |
146. Which Republicans support $5K bonds for kids? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carrieyazel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
114. This should put to rest the MSM notion that she doesn't make gaffes. She's made plenty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 07:14 AM Response to Reply #114 |
139. It's already being done in Britain. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
115. Good. You're seeing her as the simplistic panderer she truly is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carrieyazel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 05:27 PM Response to Reply #115 |
116. Excellent post. You laid it all out expertly. She must be stopped |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
119. Ya mean ya liked that idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
120. Everything she's done and THIS pisses you off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
126. Hillary woulld promise the moon to get votes rather than make her case openly and honestly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alittlelark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
132. I thought of it as BLATANT PANDERING.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Steve_in_California (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 01:59 AM Response to Original message |
133. Socialism wears many faces. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 07:34 AM Response to Reply #133 |
140. do you consider yourself a liberal or progressive or at least a Democrat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lligrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 04:01 AM Response to Original message |
135. It Makes No Sense To Me Either nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flora (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 08:37 AM Response to Original message |
147. $5000 ?!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 10:56 AM Response to Reply #147 |
149. It's a bond, it's not cash |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ImpeechBush (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 11:19 AM Response to Reply #149 |
150. It's still an awful lot of money in some other countries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
155. I'm a Hillary supporter...and I agree with you totally! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC