|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
antiimperialist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 12:49 PM Original message |
My message to those who have a problem with the Clinton "dynasty" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mark414 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
1. America is not a playground for 2 royal families |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElizabethDC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 12:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. If they're fairly elected (and I realize that hasn't always been the case) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. The Clinton part looks fabulous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. If you're for corruption! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. It does!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Looks like we need to even it up a little. lol. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antiimperialist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Royal families? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. We do, but some people are that stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
20. And then what happens? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rageneau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 06:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
30. And when you add in Tricky Dick... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
4. I just refuse to believe that I should spend my life under the rule of two families.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flordehinojos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. the way i think about the rule of two families is ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:11 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. You say "the clinton's at least".... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:14 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I think I would make the argument a little differently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antiimperialist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. And just for the record, Hillary is my third choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 03:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. Not true... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mark414 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 04:20 PM Response to Reply #13 |
27. well, the conventional wisdom seems to have already handed over the nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
7. My response: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calmblueocean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
10. Are you kidding? The point is that dynasties exclude new people from getting elected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antiimperialist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Interestingly, Bill was the media's #1 enemy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I guess I should bone up on her positions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 03:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
25. "i.e. implementing the Fairness Doctrine once again." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
15. I seem to remember we had two presidents who were father and son |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 01:57 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Obama supporters have tunnel vision. You can't reason with them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nedsdag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:22 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Ah, a Clinton supporter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 02:29 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. And what a great person emilyg is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
24. Her administration will be nearly identical to Bill's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
26. It's too bad Hillary started campaigning so early. The more I get to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
28. Frankly I don't give a damn about a politician's family ties. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rageneau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
29. How can a single- two-term president be considered a dynasty? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ncabot22 (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 07:25 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Nah, it will be Bush's turn after Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
32. Keep power in the family and the corruption grows. the clintons are example of that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-29-07 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
33. Well, is there any other reason than the one you criticize to vote FOR Sen. Clinton? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 15th 2024, 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC