Colobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-29-07 09:06 PM
Original message |
| Poll question: Barack Obama, at tomorrow's debate, will... |
|
What's the most likely scenario from the ones on the list? By the way, if you feel tempted to say something stupid about Obama or any other of the candidates, please do so somewhere else. This is political analysis, not an attack thread.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-29-07 09:07 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. I have to give this some thought. What do you think, Katz? nt |
Colobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-29-07 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. Either options 5 or 7. I think it's not in Obama's nature to |
|
get into a dogfight with other Dems. With Republicans, it would be different.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-29-07 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 16. I'm kind of between 4 and 5. I think that if he is attacked, he'll be ready and |
|
take off the gloves. If not, he'll do 5. I don't think it's in any of their natures to go after other Dems, but it's getting kind of dicey these days...
I think I'll vote 5.
|
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-29-07 09:12 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. honestly i have no idea what he or Clinton will do but i think Edwards will come out swinging |
|
he has to go for it imo tomorrow night.
|
Colobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-29-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. But he's being doing so for the last 4 or 5 debates! |
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-29-07 09:18 PM
Original message |
| well he needs to try harder or be more energetic, he's looked tired the last few |
|
times i've seen him, i'm sure his schedule is crazy and i know he's got a lot on his mind besides his campaign but he needs to really come out of the blocks tomorrow night.
|
Kagemusha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-29-07 09:14 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. He'll drop out of the debate and retire from national politics |
|
because his career is finished.
Isn't that what I should believe from the opinions of people on these message boards?
|
Colobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-29-07 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 7. Well, we are trying to make realistic polls. |
|
Regardless of the type of responses we might get.
|
CyberPieHole
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-29-07 09:16 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 09:22 PM by CyberPieHole
|
Colobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-29-07 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. Thanks for ignoring my "no attacks, please" request |
|
There are other threads for that already around.
|
jonnyblitz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-29-07 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 9. you don't get to dictate who posts on your threads. nt |
CyberPieHole
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-29-07 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 12. My apologies, I failed to read your OP thoroughly. |
|
I did not mean to intrude. I was mistakenly under the assumption that the thread was open to everyone.
|
Vanje
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-29-07 09:20 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. He will court the ffamily -values / crowd by..... |
|
...... committing to select Joe Leiberman as running mate
|
Colobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-29-07 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 11. Not an attack thread. |
|
Not intended for going after the candidate in question.
|
Vanje
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-29-07 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
Colobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-29-07 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
Vanje
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-29-07 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
Colobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-29-07 10:42 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Feb 24th 2026, 10:01 AM
Response to Original message |