|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
| Karmadillo
|
Thu Nov-01-07 05:53 PM Original message |
| Obama fails to sign Webb's warning letter to Bush. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| babylonsister
|
Thu Nov-01-07 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Was he in DC? nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| polichick
|
Thu Nov-01-07 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. Biden didn't sign either. Hmmm nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WCGreen
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 7. Biden didn't vote for the original resolution... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| polichick
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 8. Webb didn't either, did he? nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TwilightGardener
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 9. He's doing this for Hillary. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| polichick
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:02 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 10. Butt-covering then? I'm not sure... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TwilightGardener
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:07 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 14. Totally. She's now going to point to this fucking meaningless letter |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Think82
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:10 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 19. Webb wanted to pass legislation to this effect, but if the legislation were defeated, Bush could use |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| polichick
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:20 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 29. Oh. The anti-war people in Congress must be freaking out... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MNDemNY
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 13. . |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TwilightGardener
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 18. Maybe, but Clinton's Senate Web site made it sound like she and Webb generated |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| polichick
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:21 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 30. Are they such good buddies? nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TwilightGardener
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:31 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 33. Webb is hoping for VP, I'll bet. That makes him her buddy. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| polichick
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:52 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 40. You might have something there... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WCGreen
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:11 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 20. I don't know... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sandnsea
|
Thu Nov-01-07 05:56 PM Original message |
| Biden didn't either |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Clintonista2
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. SandNsea, I've noticed you falling into a certain trend... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sandnsea
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:15 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 22. Stop the hypocrisy |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Clintonista2
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:16 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 23. Um. Go look up the word "trend." |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sandnsea
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:17 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 24. You have a definite trend |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Clintonista2
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:20 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 28. You may resume your "So-And-So did it too!" rants now. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TwilightGardener
|
Thu Nov-01-07 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. I'm not getting the purpose of this letter: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| daninthemoon
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:10 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 17. I think you're right on all counts. This is primarliy a stunt to help |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TwilightGardener
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:11 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 21. Yup. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 2rth2pwr
|
Thu Nov-01-07 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. He never seems to be around when the important |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TwilightGardener
|
Thu Nov-01-07 05:58 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. This isn't important. It's a letter, not a bill. Sounds like total political cover |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Sparkly
|
Thu Nov-01-07 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. I'll wait for an explanation from him and Biden, or their campaigns, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bitwit1234
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. I told you .he sat on the fence and did not vote for about 128 bills |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| emilyg
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:40 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 38. Seems that way. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TwilightGardener
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. Here's something I don't get--doesn't Chimpy need Congressional authority |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Think82
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. If Congress alone has the right to declare war, why is this letter necessary? hmmm. If you voted no |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TwilightGardener
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 25. Here's a few others who failed to sign: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| maximusveritas
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 26. Of course he didn't. This letter is just cover for Hillary and those who voted for Kyl-Lieberman |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hisownpetard
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:55 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 41. Wasn't HRC the only Dem. presidential candidate who voted in favor of the K/L |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| babylonsister
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 27. Reason given for NOT signing it: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Karmadillo
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 31. Obama apparently introduced his own legislation to nullify the amendment |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TwilightGardener
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:28 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 32. BWAHHH!!! Gobama!! One-upsmanship! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Windy
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:31 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 34. Good for him. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Grandrose
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:34 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 37. Excellent way to go! (K&R) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hisownpetard
|
Thu Nov-01-07 09:19 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 42. Terrific. I'm happy to hear that! nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Windy
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
| 35. where are the hillary spinners? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Lucinda
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 36. Here is who DID sign PLUS responses from Obama and Biden |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Catchawave
|
Thu Nov-01-07 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 39. He probably didn't respond to Born Fighting either ? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 26th 2026, 02:13 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC