|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 10:32 PM Original message |
The sexism issue is being used to distract and deflect away from Sen. Clinton's serious flaws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. Not so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 10:48 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. So you don't like the negative attention she is getting, while she is a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 10:51 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. You didn't understand me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:02 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Kucincih is the only candidate worth voting for, at least from my perspective. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:12 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. DK's positions reflect true Democratic morals & ideals... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 12:09 AM Response to Reply #14 |
30. You know, I don't know Dennis' position on immigration, but for myself I'm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 12:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
59. The "Cancer Card" is being used to distract and deflect away from ex-Sen Edwards serious flaws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ripple
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. SHE made it about sexism, Sparkly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:09 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. I have never seen a debate before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ripple
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. They weren't character jabs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:35 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. And it's about having rested on your name for years instead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:51 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Here's my answer to your problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:55 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. No, I think our "strongest" leader- according to you- should ACT that way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:59 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. There is no candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 12:04 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. "All the time" is not what I'm looking for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 12:51 AM Response to Reply #29 |
33. A simple analysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carrieyazel
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 02:10 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Then Hillary should stay in the Senate, where she can keep working on getting compromises. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:48 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:56 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. If she doesn't want to look like a flip-flopper- as if the Republicans never thought of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 12:01 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. A careful review of the attacks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:10 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I've posted about this at length over the past few days. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ripple
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:29 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. She said it in a speech the following day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:31 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Did she ever say otherwise? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:32 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Do you think what was said in the debate to her was unfair? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:34 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. That's a separate question altogether. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 12:11 AM Response to Reply #16 |
31. She did a pep talk to a women's college - nothing about the debate was mentioned n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
3. Jumping jelly beans just think of all the fibs Obama supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 10:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Yeah? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 12:50 PM Response to Reply #3 |
41. Good defense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
6. Could we just dispense with the bullshit terms "shrill" and "cackling"-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. And the terms have nothing to do with her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 12:31 AM Response to Reply #6 |
32. Cackling always refers to HENS. It IS a gender based word, and anyone who says otherwise is being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 05:58 PM Response to Reply #32 |
45. Old news. No longer relevant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxanne
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
7. you're creating a false dilemna |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:06 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Nope, the post is quite gray. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
15. Why do you hate women? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive
![]() |
Sun Nov-04-07 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
22. Actually the dragging of this issue makes Hillary look bad and will hurt her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Froward69
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 01:14 AM Response to Original message |
34. Hillary practices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 06:00 PM Response to Reply #34 |
46. "She brought her vagina into public debate to distract us" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 06:28 AM Response to Reply #34 |
48. She brought her status |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:34 AM Response to Reply #34 |
49. there are just so many things you don't get, aren't there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rufus dog
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 02:18 AM Response to Original message |
36. Very interesting and I must embarrassingly admit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 02:39 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Yeah, it's funny that we don't think of her like that. It's also very |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 02:25 AM Response to Original message |
37. A good deal of the calls of "racism," "sexism," and "bigotry" here at DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 06:58 AM Response to Original message |
39. Hillary has strong support from progressive groups. Are these groups stupid? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 11:04 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. For the most part, yes. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
42. Yes, I've noticed very little criticism of HRC since the issue of sexism came up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
43. i think I can handle both sexism and flaws with one brain... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:13 AM Response to Reply #43 |
53. yeah, well, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
44. "She would be nowhere w/out her husband" is a fav of the "its not sexist so stop saying that" crowd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Mon Nov-05-07 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
47. Not Fair. Hillary has TOO shown leadership as a Senator. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 10:38 AM Response to Reply #47 |
50. She voted "no" to an amendment banning flag burning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:25 AM Response to Reply #50 |
54. Hillary joined with her conservative peer Joe Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 12:15 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. I'm not a Hillary supporter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 12:32 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. You don't see a disconnect between |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 12:37 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. I think they're two separate things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
51. Every one of these candidates has flaws, some "serious" some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
52. I was concerned when she LIED about opposing Bush and Cheney this whole time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
56. I agree with your headline, though little else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC