|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:02 PM Original message |
The one thing that may well cost Dems the White House in 08... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carrieyazel
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. This issue is a bad one to be for, that's for sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
2. I've heard several "political analysts" on msnbc and cnn say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Its a big issue here too... and Im in NH for chrissakes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:32 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Who is proposing amnesty? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conservdem
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 04:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
27. Biden opposed it the same night as the debate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 06:56 PM Response to Reply #6 |
56. It's not a big issue here in Maine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 07:08 PM Response to Reply #56 |
60. Im not sure. Maybe its just southern NH... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redneck Socialist
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 08:32 PM Response to Reply #60 |
72. It's definitely an issue in NH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 09:04 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. bizzare isnt it?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bhikkhu
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 01:18 AM Response to Reply #6 |
100. why is the big issue not that the constitution has been flushed? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 12:11 AM Response to Reply #2 |
90. I agree. It's a potential problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
themaguffin
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
3. Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, unsecure port/plants, healthcare, oil, Constitution..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. But do any of our candidates actually support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. Business's part in the illegal immigration problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 07:30 PM Response to Reply #20 |
64. That's right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
5. Immigration will hurt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
7. Hispanics are the fastest growing population and Bush carried a larger than usual percentage in '04 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
8. Deleted message |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:50 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. You dont need to be so fucking rude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. That's how you win elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 04:21 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. I didnt say it was rude to be told. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conservdem
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 04:44 PM Response to Reply #12 |
30. Welcome bunnies. Glad to have you and your honest post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 04:56 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. I appreciate your sentiments! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 05:39 PM Response to Reply #12 |
45. Welcome to DU bunnies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 06:06 PM Response to Reply #45 |
52. Thanks Buffy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 06:12 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. I have a feeling you will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
10. Pardon me for asking, but WHY is this a big issue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 04:14 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. I don't get why it's become a big issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 05:37 PM Response to Reply #22 |
44. And that's the thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 05:58 PM Response to Reply #44 |
49. I find it very disturbing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 07:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
62. It's not a big issue in Durham NC: a Republican challenged our incumbent mayor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
11. All they'd have to do is frame it in terms of Big Brother versus privacy rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
13. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cairycat
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
14. Sadly this is true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 05:21 PM Response to Reply #14 |
41. Your point about Mexico is right on. Why don't Dems make THAT a focus? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 05:26 PM Response to Reply #14 |
42. I agree with you 100%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
15. It's not a matter of tactics... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. What a load. WHy can't the anti-immigrant people use honest analogies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 04:11 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Think it through... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. Maybe you don't know what you're talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #29 |
55. Ya know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 11:22 PM Response to Reply #55 |
78. It was rude and ignorant for you to suggest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 11:54 PM Response to Reply #78 |
86. You're very first response in essence called me a liar... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 12:08 AM Response to Reply #86 |
87. "Intellectually dishonest" look it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 12:13 AM Response to Reply #87 |
92. Read my post 89, I've wasted enough time. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 12:51 AM Response to Reply #92 |
95. Yes, you are wasting your time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 12:10 AM Response to Reply #86 |
88. So you also disagree with the Constitution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conservdem
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 04:57 PM Response to Reply #15 |
35. I agree that offering "ANY kind of drivers license implies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 08:51 AM Response to Reply #35 |
103. Should we stop renewing licenses of people who break traffic laws? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conservdem
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 10:09 AM Response to Reply #103 |
105. No we should not stop renewing licenses of people who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 05:02 PM Response to Reply #15 |
36. ...then legalize it. No more break-ins! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. That always shuts them up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 05:42 PM Response to Reply #37 |
46. Do you really think you can get a majority behind open borders? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 06:06 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. "Its the right thing to do" usually does it for me.-nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 06:49 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. Personally, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 08:24 PM Response to Reply #54 |
70. I dunno. That doesn't really matter to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 11:24 PM Response to Reply #54 |
79. Will you go along with it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 12:17 PM Response to Reply #79 |
107. Where did I call for deportation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conservdem
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 10:13 AM Response to Reply #46 |
106. No, absolutely not. One of the worst idea for our party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 07:07 PM Response to Reply #37 |
59. If you read carefully, instead of automatically reacting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 12:11 AM Response to Reply #59 |
91. Then you should be for more immigration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 07:04 PM Response to Reply #36 |
58. We currently allow 2 million plus to enter legally each year... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 07:54 PM Response to Reply #58 |
66. You make valid points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 08:00 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Thanks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 08:23 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. I couldnt agree more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 08:27 PM Response to Reply #58 |
71. Conservation matter, not legality of immigrants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 08:59 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. It's a big issue for more than one reason... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #74 |
77. Of course they go along with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. They just admitted that it's not the fact that they broke the law that bothers them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 12:24 AM Response to Reply #77 |
94. It still is legal... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 12:52 AM Response to Reply #94 |
96. So let's make it legal for anyone to come |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 02:04 AM Response to Reply #94 |
101. C'mon chick, that's spin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 08:09 AM Response to Reply #101 |
102. That's not true... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 03:01 PM Response to Reply #102 |
110. You are talking about white people arriving from Europe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 09:35 PM Response to Reply #102 |
113. That's not true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
16. I don't think it's a big issue.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 04:02 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. I agree--they're TRYING to make it a wedge issue, but most Americans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 05:33 PM Response to Reply #19 |
43. And some DUers will be happy to help them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 05:57 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. Yep, I see that on here, and I am disappointed that there are Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 06:00 PM Response to Reply #43 |
50. oh please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 11:32 PM Response to Reply #50 |
81. Go please yourself, and when you're done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 01:27 PM Response to Reply #81 |
109. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
23. Well, bunnies... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 04:54 PM Response to Reply #23 |
33. Im afraid you're correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 05:08 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Why do you engage is such intellectual dishonesty? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 05:49 PM Response to Reply #38 |
47. I never said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 11:34 PM Response to Reply #47 |
82. polichick said it and you agreed with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 07:17 PM Response to Reply #38 |
63. But how long have you been paying taxes?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 11:37 PM Response to Reply #63 |
83. So it's about money now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 11:38 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. And I'm calling bullshit on your "Immigrants spread disease" story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 12:10 AM Response to Reply #83 |
89. This thread is about the fact that Dems could lose the election... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 12:55 AM Response to Reply #89 |
97. And you are repeating the repuke arguments throughout the thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seasat
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
25. The majority of US citizens support a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Then why the lack of support for the Bush/Kennedy Bill? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seasat
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 04:50 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. If you look at the CNN June 22-24 poll, it gives the answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 05:11 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conservdem
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
26. You are completely correct, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laureloak
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
32. I don't support illegal immigrants and I'm not the only Dem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 05:11 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. So let's change the laws to make it legal to cross the border |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laureloak
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 08:25 PM Response to Reply #39 |
112. No. Let's send them back home. Enter LEGALLY or not at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
57. Nah, the thing that always kicks us in the ass is the perception of higher taxes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 09:10 PM Response to Reply #57 |
76. agreed. Along with the misconception that Dems will take away the guns. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 11:41 PM Response to Reply #76 |
85. You might want to mention that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
61. 1st rule then should be "No undocumented aliens will be allowed to go to Iraq" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denem
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
65. Take Immigration and hit it out of the park |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
68. Irish need not apply. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trayfoot
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
73. I absolutely AGREE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inthebrain
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 12:21 AM Response to Original message |
93. This is just extremely stupid analysis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 12:58 AM Response to Reply #93 |
98. They want us to roll over for the repukes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 12:37 PM Response to Reply #93 |
108. Thats silly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inthebrain
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 08:22 PM Response to Reply #108 |
111. Then go for it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 09:38 PM Response to Reply #111 |
114. And it works for Romney because he's going for repuke votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bhikkhu
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 01:16 AM Response to Original message |
99. If mass stupidity costs them the WH, so be it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beachmom
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
104. Guiliani's record on immigration is HIS achillees heel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 24th 2024, 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC