As I see it, Hillary got a slow start, but clearly won on substance and stranger yet, passion!

[Didereaux]

Obama came across well enough, he maintained his position, with the exception of the horrendous comments on Iraq...that was a blunder. Edwards did well enough, but really didn't expand his universe. Clearly owns the passion of special intersts, but has not injected himself into the other issues with sufficient strength to gain anything.

Clinton may have salvaged NH, but Obama did not shoot any of his supporters and probably did not aliente any independents to any great number.


edit speleling

[durtee librul]

1. My ABC station must not have carried the same debate yours did.

[KennedyGuy]

2. I agree

That's the Hillary I see going all the way to the White House.

[Evergreen Emerald]

3. I agree with you as well. It is a shame that no matter what she does she will be attacked

She cannot win...no passion or shrill.

Backwards and in high heels

[goldcanyonaz]

4. She was great!

[aquart]

5. What did he say about Iraq?

I'm sick and I just woke up

[Didereaux]

8. See an earlier thread about Obamas comments on Iraq being stupid.

[samplegirl]

6. I think the real passion

was felt from Edwards. Actions speak for itself.

[ananda]

7. Disagree. Edwards clearly won!

Clinton did well, but Edwards
had the message and the passion!

[RichGirl]

9. Even though I'm a Clinton...

...supporter, I'd be thrilled to have any democrat as president.

Obama gives a great speech, but he doesn't do well in debates. He stammers and stumbles too much. If he's the nom he will be debating the republican. I can't stand any of them, but they do all speak very well.

[DemCam]

10. Clinton's "moment" was wonderful...

and passionate and she didn't lie down. I'm fascinated that there are those who said
she was losing it. Amazing!

I don't know if she salvaged NH, but I certainly hope so. She's the best for this time in history...

[Captain Hilts]

11. She and Obama took turns lookin' punch drunk. nt