oberliner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-21-08 01:59 AM
Original message |
| Biden would've matched up very well against McCain |
|
I'm sorry he didn't stick around longer. Not sure that enough voters had a chance to give him a serious look.
|
frogcycle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-21-08 02:10 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. they had all the chance in the world |
|
the vast majority of voters think this is American Idol
Biden would have mopped the floor with any of the pugs, and also is by far the best qualified for the job
the entire process is broken - and toxic, as Gore puts it. Good people like Gore, Biden, Feingold, Clark opt out rather than continue to tilt at windmills
Sanjaya for POTUS!
|
oberliner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-21-08 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. He didn't seem to get a whole lot of press coverage |
|
I think if he'd been in that four person debate instead of Richardson, he might've gotten a little more attention.
Who knows?
|
frogcycle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-21-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. "the voters" had as much chance as i did |
|
I have the same available press coverage as all of them. OK, some don't have HS Internet, cable TV with C-SPAN.
But a ton of people with the same "chance" to see throught the bull opted to memorize the mantra like so many preschoolers learning the alphabet on Sesame Street.
No, it's not that they didn't have a chance; it's that they were brainwashed willingly.
|
dtotire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-21-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. I think primary process should be scrapped |
|
Go back to when the candidates were nominated in the general convention. The primary process is costly, and doesn't get us the most qualified candidates. The average voter is influenced by the money poured into it, and by name recognition. I believe that professional politicians would end up selecting someone who is highly qualified and electable. Hillary and Obama are probably less electable than someone like Biden, Richardson, or Edwards.
|
frogcycle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-21-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. well, the "good old days" |
|
weren't all that great either.
Some real dogs have become POTUS over the past couple of centuries.
I agree the current process is an abomination.
Maybe we need to just hire a chief executive like cities who hire a city manager instead of electing a mayor.
The position is supposed to be one of implementing the laws, not making shit up. So downgrade the hell out of it.
|
PatSeg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-21-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. There are still voters who don't have a clue who he is |
|
He definitely would have been the best candidate to put up against any republican in a general election. The MSM is choosing our candidates for us and they chose to ignore Biden.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Mar 08th 2026, 09:38 PM
Response to Original message |