_Jumper_
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-04 05:03 PM
Original message |
| Have the people flocked to one candidate like this before? |
|
Edited on Tue Mar-02-04 05:06 PM by _Jumper_
In a primary have people flocked to one candidate like they have to Kerry? He won Iowa and suddenly he is winning almost literally everywhere. It will be 28 out of 30 after tonight. It was almost as if they ordered to do this after Iowa.
Note: excludes campaigns when a president or VP ran.
|
LittleDannySlowhorse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-04 05:04 PM
Response to Original message |
|
This is probably the most decisive primary sweep I've ever seen.
|
WilliamPitt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-04 05:05 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Bradley was toast pretty quick.
|
_Jumper_
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-04 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
I forgot to add that campaigns in which presidents and VP's ran don't count since they are almost automatic heirs.
What is your take on the Kerry surge, Mr. Pitt?
|
WilliamPitt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-04 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Edited on Tue Mar-02-04 05:13 PM by WilliamPitt
1. Dean's frontrunner status was 100% a creation of the media, and of his fundraising prowess. No votes had been cast when they all said it was going to be Dean. The media giveth, and the media beats you to deatheth. One might argue that Dean was in large part the author of his own demise, that Trippi was a great organizer but a poor wartime consigliere, and also an ineffective counterpuncher...but were one to say this, one would be dunned by squadrons of pissed-off Dean people. Regardless, the hole left by Dean was filled by Kerry.
2. Kerry's campaign problems in December and January were because he had too many advisors, and those advisors were giving him bad advice. He would veto their advice, and nothing would get done. Also, his internet crew was not connected to his communications crew, leaving a bigass gap. He cleaned house and fixed that, and we see the results.
3. This one is anathema to many: Kerry is actually *gasp* a really strong candidate who doesn't need BFEE-DLC-S&B-Media conspiracy help to get voters to vote for him.
Nutshell. :)
|
Uzybone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-04 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
very well put. But its easier to blame it on Diebold and Fox/Msnbc/CNN.
|
VelmaD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-04 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
Edited on Tue Mar-02-04 05:34 PM by VelmaD
"and the media beats you to deatheth"
Gawd I needed that laugh with the day I've been having. You are a nut. Absolutely dead on I think in your assessment of what gives with the Kerry surge. But also a nut. :)
|
dsc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-04 05:05 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If the exit polls are correct he will lose Vermont to Dean.
|
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-04 05:06 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. In 1980 Reagan only lost Iowa and then swept. |
_Jumper_
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-04 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-04 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 7. I think he won all the rest, but I'm not sure. |
|
It was pretty darn close though.
|
iamjoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-04 05:30 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. Jump On The Bandwagon |
|
It is the "ABB" attitude, and somehow people are convinced Kerry is the best one to beat Bush because right after Iowa the poll came out of a hypothetical match up that showed Kerry ahead.
The DLC loves it because they wanted a quick primary anyway.
Personally, I disagree. Remember all the "Dated Dean, Married Kerry" bit the media was tossing around after Iowa, I think we're going to wake up and discover we're committed to a bore, but it may be too late.
Sigh, wish it were Edwards. He's charming, fun and I think in a far better position to beat Bush, I read RNC.org and the worst they can say about Edwards is that he's a trial lawyer with not much experience. They can call Kerry on every "bad" vote made.
|
Feanorcurufinwe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-04 06:11 PM
Response to Original message |
| 12. Never before in recent Democratic party history. |
|
THAT is really the biggest story that the media does not want to report. This is shaping up to be the most united Democratic party for a Presidential election cycle in my adult lifetime. That means coattails, pickups at every level.
We are watching something historic, and I am excited to be part of it. Here in Montana we are on a quest to win back the governorship, and, well getting the legislature back may be too much to hope for, but we can at least make a good start at it. Good thing Baucus isn't running this year, he'd throw a real monkeywrench in the unity equation.
|
Vas Liz
(82 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-04 08:28 PM
Response to Original message |
| 13. I suspect something is up |
|
Kerry is an insider. I believe he is actually getting this much support as much as I believe Iraq has WMDs.
|
Kathleen04
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-04 08:31 PM
Response to Original message |
| 14. There's a definite fervency to get rid of Dubya |
|
hopefully it will work to our advantage in November.
|
mlawson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-04 08:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Dems: 1976, 1984, 1988, 1992.
But I do not feel good about this one.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Mar 13th 2026, 06:11 AM
Response to Original message |