|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
RiverStone
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:04 PM Original message |
Scary shit here: Harold Ickes says Clinton would control a majority of the credentials committee... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. Clintons have controlled Dem party structure since 1993. Controlled WEAKENING |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Bullshit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. LOL that's some revisionist history. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:46 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. OMG, you are accusing me of revisionist history/ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 05:02 PM Response to Reply #18 |
35. That's ABSURD. Clinton'S protection of Jackson Stephens and Poppy caused the turnover |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carrieyazel
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #13 |
32. Conveniently minimizing the 2006 election victory, which has made your figures irrelevant now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. The clintons were good little triangulators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johnny__Motown
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #9 |
28. HA, the neo-cons would have destroyed this party if not for the Clintons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 04:59 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. Exactly - Clintons ARE NEOCONS. But some are just too uninformed to see it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 04:58 PM Response to Reply #9 |
33. Bullshit! Without Clintons protection BushInc would've been in jail by the end of 1994 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 05:33 PM Response to Reply #9 |
38. Holy pedestal batman!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
15. Please explain to me how they controlled weakening of the party structure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #15 |
23. Their chosen party heads allowed party infrastructure to collapse in too many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. Randi Rhodes has been talking about this for the last two weeks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RiverStone
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Did Randi say if committee members could be replaced? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #4 |
21. This is not a trial! The party rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HeraldSquare212
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
3. I don't think they'd bail her out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
24. You mean bullying, don't you? We are getting quite used to that from Obama supporters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
5. Political suicide, IMO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alhena
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
6. Relax- the Superdelegates will decide this for Obama long before the convention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RiverStone
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I appreciate your optimism... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I've also read somewhere that Dean doesn't have the heft he needs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 05:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
37. And a couple of days ago I heard some Clinton supporter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:57 PM Response to Reply #6 |
25. So, let me see. It's ok if the super delegates get together and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
10. Fear mongers at large again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
11. The threats need to stop. The party will do what the party was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 04:13 PM Response to Reply #11 |
31. juajen I can't believe people hang on the word of Ickes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
12. I believe each state's representatives are based on the primary vote in that state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
14. Oh no! Hillary is going to enfranchise Florida and Michigan Democrats! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HeraldSquare212
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
16. Credentials committee members and bios |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:44 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. That's not the entire committee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HeraldSquare212
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. OK, thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
19. That doesn't mean they can't think for themselves and see that would be a bad idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sulawesi
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
26. Very scary... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheney Killed Bambi
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
27. This will be up to Howard Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 04:03 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. He has already named his choices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. You are Correct! This will be over before then because superDs have to go back home. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
36. He was on the rules committee that made the rules he wants to break. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran
![]() |
Sat Feb-16-08 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
39. The credentials committee makes it decision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 23rd 2024, 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC