TheStateChief
(232 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-20-04 11:48 AM
Original message |
| Zogby: Kerry 46, Bush 46, Nader 2 (Kerry Wins w/o Nader!) |
|
No link - just saw it on MSNBC.
|
Pale Blue Dot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-20-04 11:50 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Keep in mind with these polls |
|
that they are national polls, and don't take into account that Nader is running as an independent and is unlikely to get on the ballot of every state.
A lot of this will depend on which states he gets on the ballot.
|
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-20-04 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. That's right, but lots of people learned a lesson in 2000 |
|
I know quite a few people who voted for Nader in 2000 because they didn't like either major candidate or either party! They now say that they still like Nader's message, but wouldn't voter for him again because they learned that he was very wrong on ONE THING.....there was no difference in the 2 candidates. All are sorry they put * in the WH.
|
IndianaGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-20-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 10. Nader will need a running mate to get on the ballot at all! |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-20-04 01:02 PM by IndianaGreen
One cannot run for Prez by themselves, they need a running mate.
The fact that Nader is running solo without a political party backing him, makes it even harder for him to get on the ballot.
In Indiana, even a bona fide third party needs to get 5% for the office of Secretary of State to be assured of a place in the ballot.
Nader is no threat to anyone.
|
Not Me
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-20-04 11:53 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. I was one of those polled :) |
|
On Thursday by the Zogby folks.
|
mobuto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-20-04 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
You told them you were voting Bush, right? ;-)
|
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-20-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. Wonder how many people tell the truth in these polls? |
|
I usually tell them I'm an Ind. I can't say that I'm as serious a Dem as the rest of you because I really do try to listed to all presentations before making my decision. I just haven't heard a Pub "ever" that I preferred over the Dem candidate.
YEOOOWWWWW I felt that one! Don't throw things!!!!
I voted for Gore in 2000, but I must admit, when the SC decided the election, although I feel they were very wrong in making a decision at all, I never thought * would be as bad a Pres. as he's turned out to be.
|
mobuto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-20-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-20-04 12:08 PM by mobuto
|
lancdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-20-04 11:58 AM
Response to Original message |
| 5. Notice how much smaller Nader's share is in this poll (2 percent) |
|
than in others. I'm not surprised, because Zogby polls likely voters, and Nader's support is soft.
|
RichM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-20-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. So, it would be smart for Dems to alienate the Left, no? After all, since |
|
there's no chance the election will be close, Democrats can easily afford to tell potential allies to kiss off... :eyes:
|
DaisyUCSB
(455 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-20-04 12:56 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. So there are 6 percent undecided. That should grow as the election |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-20-04 12:58 PM by DaisyUCSB
progresses. I think Nader has been gettting some of the undecided Number.
Also, the polls in the swingstates might be more important. After all, Bush could have 75 percent in all the safe redstates and therefor more of the popular vote and still lose the electoral college
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Mar 05th 2026, 05:05 PM
Response to Original message |