|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Maddy McCall
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:04 PM Original message |
Howard Dean painted himself in the corner with his arbitrary rule.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. I admire Howard Dean from 04 but like him quite a bit better now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thunder rising
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. My candidate is Barack, but I'll side with Dean period. He is the reason for this primary season!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:08 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Yep. He's a good man, and a tough, brainy Democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
28. I was really bummed he wasn't our nominee in '04 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Agree -- he has done so much demonstrable good. And people tend to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #31 |
42. He won us the congress in 06 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:30 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Again, agreed whole-heartedly -- true, he's a tough customer, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
43. so you support adopting a rule that would strip votes from fellow Democrats? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:32 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. Hi, doctor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #48 |
55. so you think it is fair to have a rule that would disenfrancise voters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:38 PM Original message |
I'm really sorry doc but I'm not buying your hinge premise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. Do you think the voters in MI who weren't able to vote for their choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesertFlower
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. i agree. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nitrogenica
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
3. The rules shouldn't be changed to fit an agenda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
27. That's the part that bothers me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:30 PM Response to Reply #3 |
46. and we should not have rules that lead to voter disenfrnachisement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Slagathor
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 04:29 PM Response to Reply #46 |
66. It's not a real election--it's only a primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 06:00 PM Response to Reply #66 |
69. no - that is true . . . . . they are different |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. 1) We're turning on Dean now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. The OP enjoys that sort of thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:12 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. The Clinton DLC has always hated Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #4 |
24. You can disagree with someone without "turning on" them. In the REAL world, anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #4 |
29. Silly, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
50. yes - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
7. IT WASN'T HIS RULE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
8. You and Hill are in it to spin it. Whan are you going to get real? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
10. I agree. It IS "schoolmarmy." He could help the situation by offering to help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:11 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. He offered to help FL monetarily right up front to run another contest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:22 PM Response to Reply #13 |
36. Last I heard, he said "You gotta pay for it. You gotta fix it." And I have a cite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:25 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. And my statement said he offered this "up front" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fadedrose
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
12. Pay no attention, Dr. Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denem
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
15. Maddy - Dean's silly rule |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
16. Howard Dean did not vote for the rule. It was a rules committee vote and Ickes was on the committee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JimGinPA
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #16 |
33. HRC Fanatics Here Can't Be Swayed By Actual Facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BumRushDaShow
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
17. Read this.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #17 |
51. That doesn't count! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
18. the states agreed to it - and now they must be held accountable for their own choices nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
19. I disagree. I don't think anyone in the party expected to be where we are now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:25 PM Response to Reply #19 |
40. Even as an Obama supporter if he got all the uncommitted delegates from MI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #40 |
58. They are currently tied in MI revote polling (rassmussen) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RBInMaine
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
20. You couldn't be any more incorrect. Here is why: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
21. Arbitary or not, the FL/MI Dem leaders knew there would be consequences |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
22. Why not call Dean out when he is wrong... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
23. Applying previously set DNC rule to everyone = Arbitrary. Hoo-kay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
25. Howard Dean is in charge and is doing a great job as DNC chair. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
26. Gov Dean is trying to lend sanity to the primary season. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
30. They were chatting on NPR about what a weak chair he has become. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:22 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. *N*ational re*P*ublican *R*adio. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #35 |
53. get a grip!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #53 |
62. Yeah, that is reaching a bit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
32. And the next time there's a problem, manufactured by (Florida) Repuglicans or not, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. Let's just have the damn 2012 primaries now while we're at it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #37 |
54. Absolutely! There's a huge difference between how things "should" be and how they are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
34. DNC voted on this--It is not Dean's rule |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:24 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. McCauliffe made it clear in no uncertain terms that he wouldn't tolerate moving up primaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:30 PM Response to Reply #38 |
44. And the Queen of Lies' henchman Harold Ickes voted to punish FL and MI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:34 PM Response to Reply #38 |
52. McAwful set this process in motion, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Window
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
39. Seating the Fl & MI delegates is neither the easiest, nor the fairest solution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluerum
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
47. No ego. Just making sure everyone plays by the rules. He did not screw the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
49. Agree - MI and FL votes will count in the GE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #49 |
56. well said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Life Long Dem
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
57. ahhhh the states disenfranchised themselves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gore1FL
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
59. It was the Rules committee, not Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
60. Give it up. Even with Florida and MI, Hillary still loses. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
61. The rules were sent to every state committee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w13rd0
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
63. I support Howard Dean... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marnieworld
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
64. It doesn't bother you that Obama wasn't even on the ballot in MI? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Slagathor
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
65. No he didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
67. Maddy lets play devil's advocate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Upfront
![]() |
Sun Mar-09-08 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
68. Wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 03:15 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC