|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
ruggerson
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:19 PM Original message |
Obama doubletalks on the Drudge "Somalia garb" photo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
1. It's great how Clinton never specifically DENIED this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoof Hearted
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. It's great how O-folk keep repeating that bullshit MEME. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. Why should she? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 01:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
104. Yes she did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
2. Deleted message |
LisaL
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
3. Oh my goodness. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 10:38 AM Response to Reply #3 |
89. Let's see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zabet
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
4. Two words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckeown1128
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Is it possible at all that he could have found out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zabet
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:30 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. How can she leak a photo that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDoorbellRang
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 11:10 PM Response to Reply #11 |
50. He said he took her at her word that *she* knew nothing about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 11:04 AM Response to Reply #50 |
96. ding.ding.ding. We have a winner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 08:28 AM Response to Reply #11 |
83. If he found any proof he should substantiate his claim. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 10:39 AM Response to Reply #11 |
90. Or, as I posted elsewhere in this thread, Obama has learned ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:28 PM Response to Reply #4 |
21. Two words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:31 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. I saw that right away. This is not a lie but a statement of his belief |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zabet
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:36 PM Response to Reply #21 |
31. Two words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 11:11 PM Response to Reply #21 |
52. Pretty convoluted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ashy Larry
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
5. He said her campaign leaked it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. How do you leak something that's already been published? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ashy Larry
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:23 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Maybe leak isn't the proper term then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 10:41 AM Response to Reply #13 |
91. Precisely. Just as her campaign did in Iowa ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
8. It isn't possible that your campaign can do things without telling you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pajjr
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. It isn't possible that the republicans did it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
judaspriestess
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:50 PM Response to Reply #22 |
41. nah, you're making to much sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
9. Your Children Will Die in Their Sleep if You Vote For The Drug Dealing Muslim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pablooscar
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
10. Obama supporters love Drudge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:23 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Welcome (back) to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:35 PM Response to Reply #12 |
30. I want royalties for that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:40 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. You got it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:42 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. we'll just pretend I'm Deval |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:43 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:46 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Hey there will be no laughing or unity among Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:25 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Wow. Back so soon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:25 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Pie Hole! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:27 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. Bullshit....Show me a list of Obama supporters who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
27. LOLOL!!! ... the Mods were too quick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoldieAZ49
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 11:20 PM Response to Reply #27 |
55. damn you guys nailed him fast! How did you know it was him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 11:23 PM Response to Reply #55 |
59. It came back again as '24areas' but the Mods got it in 2 posts: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:48 PM Response to Reply #10 |
40. did you see this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
directdeposit
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:57 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. Did you see this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 11:01 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. umm...If you do a search.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yesteryear
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 11:20 PM Response to Reply #46 |
56. He warmed so much that he posted a pic of Hil's wrinkly face |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yesteryear
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 11:21 PM Response to Reply #46 |
57. And he "warmed" so much that he said, without evidence, that an email |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 11:43 PM Response to Reply #57 |
63. Zombies! Hillary Zombies ("Hillbies"?) Everywhere! Is this Night Of The Living Brandead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 12:19 AM Response to Reply #63 |
68. Surely 'hillbillies'.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
16. Maybe someone who quit the Clinton campaign told Obama the source of the photo leak? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 07:49 AM Response to Reply #16 |
79. stop spreading dangerous concocted rumor you just made up please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 08:16 AM Response to Reply #79 |
82. A harmless question on a message board is a "dangerous concocted rumor?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texastoast
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
17. Both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RBInMaine
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
19. He said the "campaign" leaked it, not her personally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abacus
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:35 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. Yep, the statements are not mutually exclusive. /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:37 PM Response to Reply #19 |
32. parsing eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 11:11 PM Response to Reply #32 |
51. Reading comprehension. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 11:35 PM Response to Reply #51 |
62. don't even try |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
24. I was surprised he chose to bring this up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoadRage
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
26. I take Senator Clinton at her word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 08:46 AM Response to Reply #26 |
86. "I take him/her at her word" is hardly an original phrase so how could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemGa
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
28. Well now, that's not setting it aside, is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:38 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. Well I think he may have tried to set it aside... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:39 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. or maybe he lied on national television to appear gracious when he isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemGa
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:43 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. I think the point is that Obama is going back on his former statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RBInMaine
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:53 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. One day Hillary praises him, the next she plays the "shame on you card." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnnydrama
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 11:17 PM Response to Reply #37 |
54. VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemGa
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 11:24 PM Response to Reply #54 |
60. Why not address Obama in terms of Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 10:47 AM Response to Reply #54 |
92. She has *NOT* made the "in 3 months" statement...! ?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
43. And what if a presidential candidate in the feature is Muslim/Jewish? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
45. He said that at least 1 "as far as I know" ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 11:06 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. It's a bullshit accusation on his part on you know it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 11:09 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. "As far as you know" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 11:15 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. Well tell us which staffer did it then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 11:22 PM Response to Reply #53 |
58. Do you think I think he is an angel, or Jesus Christ come back to earth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 08:11 AM Response to Reply #58 |
80. I see you have no name yet. Drudge has not produced the email either. YOU LOSE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #80 |
102. oh I lose, oh noes! i am the weakest link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 10:49 AM Response to Reply #53 |
93. You certainly can't be asking for a journalist to reveal his source. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #93 |
99. HA HA DRUDGE is a journalist!! --Where IS that email?--No where!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. Did you like that? I was immensely proud. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 03:11 PM Response to Reply #100 |
105. drudge said he had an email. which he did not produce. Therefore therei |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #105 |
106. Ok, putting aside the fact that, no, Drudge is NOT a journalist ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
47. Clue: Obama is a doubletalking liar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ileanasouza
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 12:15 AM Response to Reply #47 |
66. Agree n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 12:33 AM Response to Reply #66 |
74. Yeah, We Need a Clinton Back in The White House to Get Some Truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 10:49 AM Response to Reply #74 |
94. good one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Mon Mar-10-08 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
61. don't worry, he'll apologize again for pushing the racisism charge at the next debate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 08:13 AM Response to Reply #61 |
81. yeah I recall BO saying HRC comments were NOT racial (MLK) on the eve |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malik flavors
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
64. Nafta-Gate was B.S. and the Clintons pushed that story, so this is fair game. You reap what you sow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 12:13 AM Response to Original message |
65. Obama just found out that Hillary has a time machine and that she went back to 2006 to leak the pic: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malik flavors
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 12:25 AM Response to Reply #65 |
69. The problem isn't the pictures existence. The problem is circulating it in e-mail form... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 12:27 AM Response to Reply #69 |
71. show us the proof as to who emailed it to whom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 07:37 AM Response to Reply #69 |
78. Drudge has NEVER produced the email. It is heresay by DRUDGE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 12:17 AM Response to Original message |
67. this is the lamest post I've seen here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
70. He likely learned the truth betweeen 2/26 and 3/10 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 12:28 AM Response to Reply #70 |
72. If he had, it would have been a huge news story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 12:32 AM Response to Reply #72 |
73. Doubt it. The press is in full anti-Obama mode right now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 10:51 AM Response to Reply #70 |
95. Yes, the truth that Hillary's word cannot be counted-upon. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avrdream
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 03:18 AM Response to Original message |
75. It just keeps getting better and better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 03:19 AM Response to Original message |
76. equivocate, equivocate, and hope the duped masses don't notice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 07:22 AM Response to Original message |
77. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
84. Sen. Clinton didn't know about the photo. Sen. Clinton's campaign did. Where's the disconnect? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elixir
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 08:42 AM Response to Original message |
85. I guess you missed the program where she did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 08:50 AM Response to Original message |
87. He wants the smear to stick knowing he hasn't any proof. Inspiring. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
88. Perhaps, since that statement on February 26th, 2008 ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
97. How many threads are you going to make on the very same topic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
98. Did you see the press conference his handlers shut down? Be looking for BO to double-talk his way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newfie4
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
101. Maybe he shouldn't wear those clothes to begin with if he wants to run for President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Mar-11-08 01:19 PM Response to Reply #101 |
103. LOL... yes, let's cater to idiots everywhere! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC