Redbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 12:12 PM
Original message |
| Poll question: What is the best way for Obama supporters to get Clinton supporters to support |
|
Sen. Obama in the fall campaign?
|
stray cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. For him to be second on the ticket..... |
Skip Intro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. That bridge has been burned for many. |
|
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 12:14 PM by Skip Intro
|
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Get Sen. Obama the Democratic nomination. |
Just-plain-Kathy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. People have to realize, any democrat would be better then a republican. |
|
I hate Hillary, but if I have to I'll vote for her over McCain.
A corporate democrat won't hurt you as much while they're ripping you off, where a republican would push you down and kick you before they'd leave you for dead.
|
uponit7771
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. I don't see HRC people wanting to talk about the issue, they're not informed about BHO or they... |
|
...regurgitate what someone's told them.
BHO's positives far out weight Hillary's IMHO
|
salbi
(195 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 18. It's hard to change a closed, made up mind. |
Bluestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. For starters, Obama supporters could start acting civil on |
uponit7771
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 9. Civil = supporting Hillary throwing Obama under bus & saying so what to her vote on Cluster bombs? |
Bluestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 10. Those are your words, not mine |
|
Civil as in recognizing that St. Obama may not be the be-all, end-all answer to all of our problems. And recognizing that he has flaws, just like Hillary, and we just happen to disagree with your choice. And giving some respect to those who disagree with your choice, rather than the constant beat of derision that is seen here.
It amazes me that you can change even the word "civil" to something that is partisan and divisive.
|
stillcool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 15. I think it's a matter of replying in kind... |
ronnykmarshall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
that's a few of the "civil" things I've been called.
|
Umbram
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. Where is the option for: Don't give a flying f*#$ about message board drama kings/queens? |
|
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 12:34 PM by Umbram
As hard as it is for some around here to imagine, DU is not 90% of the democratic base.
The "I won't vote for Candidate X because his/her supporters hurt my feelings" crowd is irrelevant, both as a voting block and as participants in the party's discourse.
Oh, and as a matter of record: I think the OP is a bit quick to call the race over.
|
Redbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 13. Good point about the race not being over. |
|
But neither candidate can win in November without the other's supporters.
Its not just this board where there is a problem.
25% of Dems currently wouldnt support Obama in an Obama-McCain matchup.
|
Umbram
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 19. This shouldn't shock us. |
|
25% of U.S. citizens will worship the ground Bush walks on even if he starts drinking the blood of puppies in the streets.
Until we have chosen our candidate we can't be surprised that the same percentage of Democrats are so hyper-partisan that they would say that they will not support the other candidate while their candidate is still in the picture. Once either Obama or Clinton come out on top the vast majority of that 25% will support our nominee. Right now the Us versus Them is within our own party. Once cooler heads prevail, everyone will remember that 'Them' are the conservatives and the same 25% of hyper-partisans will want to be involved again.
And what if they don't? Well, I am not for herding sheep into the polls by making sure to kiss all of the paper cuts they got by becoming hyper-partisan to begin with. Personally, I think the majority of this crap I see here at DU is pure attention mongering. As to the general public, who knows.
|
aquarius dawning
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. Why would we be supporting him in the fall campaign when it will be Hillary running for President? |
GarbagemanLB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 16. anyway, back to reality... |
DemVet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message |
| 11. Get down on your knees and beg. |
stillcool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message |
| 14. They have to come to that decision.. |
|
by themselves, as will I if Clinton should somehow get the nomination. I think I've read and heard enough, but should the time come, who knows?
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-11-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message |
| 17. If they're DEMS, it shouldn't be an issue, should it? (nt) |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 12th 2026, 04:11 AM
Response to Original message |