bain_sidhe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-15-08 03:46 PM
Original message |
| Shocking disclosure!!! HUGH!! |
|
Neither of our candidates eat babies for breakfast! When you add this to the fact that neither of them stomp on puppies for their daily exercise, well...
How can either of them survive this???
|
yardwork
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-15-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Can anyone actually prove that none of them ate babies for breakfast? |
|
In other news, McCain eats ten babies for breakfast. Media yawns.
|
bain_sidhe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-15-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
I was so worried that their supporters would have nothing left to accuse each other of. But this works!
RELEASE THE BREAKFAST MENU RECORDS!!
DENOUNCE THE BABY EATERS AMONG YOUR SUPPORTERS!
Whew.
|
NewHampshireDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-15-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-15-08 04:01 PM by NewHampshireDem
Is this how low we've sunk?
Just because they don't actually eat the babies, we're going to overlook all the baby's blood drinking *your* candidate does?
BTW, your uncalled for, implicit denouncement of baby eating has set back the cause of baby eaters 200 years. I pray that my children can overcome this ... well, the one's that don't get eaten, that is.
:eyes:
|
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-15-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. None of them have denied eating puppies or stomping babies |
|
At this point I simply cannot vote for either candidate.
I already voted in the New Hampshire primary.
|
bain_sidhe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-15-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 5. This is true. Where's the outrage? |
|
Where are the calls for them to categorically reject and renounce baby-stomping and puppy-eating???
That's what I want to know.
Oh, yeah, and :kick:
|
sorrybushisfromtexas
(416 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-15-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Hugh Who? This is the third post today talking about him
Is that my uncle Hugh, you are talking about. He can't help it, that side of the family is inbred. They are from Arkansas (I apologize to ever Arkansan I just slimed). I am from Texas, and we think, and only think that we are perfect.
It is a personality defect.
By the way the word is Huge.
|
bain_sidhe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-15-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
from some typo many years ago that somebody found on a right-wing site. Actually, the whole thing goes:
This is HUGH!!! I'M SERIES!!!!!111!
There used to be a DU Lexicon around somewhere that explains all the in jokes to new members, but I've lost track of it. Maybe somebody can post the URL so I can re-bookmark it?
Oh, and Welcome to DU! :hi: You picked a bad week to stop sniffing glue though.
|
WillyT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-15-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 7. It's Not Enough To Deny Eating Babies, They Must Denounce And Reject Eating Babies !!! |
|
And They have yet to do that.
:rofl:
|
bain_sidhe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-15-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
The baby-eaters, I mean, not the babies. "Twouldn't be nice to fire babies.
|
NewHampshireDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-15-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 10. It's hard to fire babies |
|
Too much powder and they just gunk up the inside of the cannon.
|
bain_sidhe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-15-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 11. Puppies and kittens are worse though |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-15-08 05:39 PM by bain_sidhe
It's the fur, I think.
:rofl:
**edited for misbehaving emoticon**
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Feb 20th 2026, 02:25 AM
Response to Original message |