|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 03:42 PM Original message |
| Obama's poll numbers going down and people aren't even paying real attention yet... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jezebel
|
Sun Apr-13-08 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. too bad Gallup disagrees. But since Clinton is a Republican now she prefers Rasmussen. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. Too bad we don't have much data to go by right now |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jezebel
|
Sun Apr-13-08 03:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 7. Well you choose to use Rasmussen for your data but ignore Gallup. I guess it didn't fit your premise |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Texas Hill Country
|
Mon Apr-14-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 97. Rass seemed fine to the obama supporters when he is up.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bevoette
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 19. didn't he "tank" 10 points after Wright...only to come back with an even bigger lead? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| PseudoIntellect
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 30. Exactly. Pastorgate was HUGE compared to truthfully saying the word "bitter," and that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:54 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 60. The difference is the msm bailed him out with his BS speech |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| PseudoIntellect
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:08 PM Response to Reply #60 |
| 65. BS speech? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:13 PM Response to Reply #65 |
| 67. It was a speech designed to save his neck. Just words (without any substance)... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| PseudoIntellect
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:18 PM Response to Reply #67 |
| 70. ...okay, maybe you're right. We'll see what happens with the polls in the next week. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hutzpa
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:45 PM Response to Reply #67 |
| 83. I thought you got TS'ed |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ginchinchili
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:51 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 59. Problem for Obama is that it's the accululated effect that has snared him this time. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Joe the Revelator
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 20. Hey Jackson_Schtick....when you try to hold the high ground, and talk about there not being.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cliffordu
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 57. Too bad they use such a small subset of Hill supporters. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 24. It's not Hillary whose theme is "Reach out to Republicans" That theme belongs to DLC-lite, Obama |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:55 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 61. They are so infused with the red stuff they don't realize Obama has more DLC support |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:17 PM Response to Reply #61 |
| 69. If they don't realize it by now, then they need to get away from DU for a while |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 06:10 PM Response to Reply #69 |
| 85. Yup. They are so desparate for a "savior" they suspend reality to make O what they want him to be |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| msallied
|
Sun Apr-13-08 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. Cling to the delusion that this means ANYTHING in the grand scheme of things. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hamlette
|
Sun Apr-13-08 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. according to Rassmussen...one poll |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 03:50 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 6. Why didn't you mention the date of that poll? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jezebel
|
Sun Apr-13-08 03:51 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. Have you seen Gallup today? Obama is back up to 50 and that INCLUDES yesterday.Clinton is down 1. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 03:55 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 10. I just did. Let's see if it is accurate or an outlier |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Sun Apr-13-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 12. Deleted message |
| Name removed
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 29. Deleted message |
| mtnsnake
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:18 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 39. You should talk, Jack-off Roses |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 45. I never said that. No single polls makes a trend |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jenmito
|
Sun Apr-13-08 03:59 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 14. No. The Gallup Poll had him fall below Hillary after the Wright thing. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:36 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 46. He went down in every poll after pastorgate--but he then rebounded |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jenmito
|
Sun Apr-13-08 06:38 PM Response to Reply #46 |
| 89. Do you forget you said, "Didn't Gallup also show that pastorgate didn't make a difference? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| grantcart
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 53. here's today's poll |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| woolldog
|
Mon Apr-14-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #53 |
| 95. k |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| otohara
|
Sun Apr-13-08 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. Is This Making The Case For SuperD's to Overturn |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| leftofcool
|
Sun Apr-13-08 03:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 16. There is always MCain |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| OzarkDem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 72. More likely more of them will switch to Clinton |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HockeyMom
|
Sun Apr-13-08 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. Say hello to President McCain |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 03:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 11. I go by facts. She gets as many rethugs as Obamka in the GE and more Dems |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HockeyMom
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 21. They voted for her in Primary |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 47. EXACTLY. That is why Obama has consistently won the rethug vote in the primaries |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sun Apr-13-08 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. Looks like Obama fever has peaked out. Oh well, he gave it a fair shot, just not good enough |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jenmito
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:03 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 26. Look at THIS: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:13 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 34. That's the past. Here, look at this instead, jen: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jenmito
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:28 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 41. It's including yesterday. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:33 PM Response to Reply #41 |
| 44. but yesterday is the past, is it not? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jenmito
|
Sun Apr-13-08 06:32 PM Response to Reply #44 |
| 87. You claimed the present is "his bubble has burst." The Gallup Poll posted included the days his |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JackORoses
|
Sun Apr-13-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #44 |
| 93. the Past, just like Hillary's campaign, MountedSnake |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:39 PM Response to Reply #41 |
| 49. Who cares? Most people don't pay attention to politics on weekends |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jenmito
|
Sun Apr-13-08 06:33 PM Response to Reply #49 |
| 88. Yeah. Let's wait to see how folks feel about Bill Clinton's multiple lies about Hillary's lies. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cali
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 27. too bad, this is hillary's last chance and she blew it. she's damaged |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 32. Last chance at what? Proving all you guys wrong again like she always does? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cali
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:16 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 68. when has she ever proved me wrong |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Straight Shooter
|
Sun Apr-13-08 06:46 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 91. Every time you use "bitter" to describe Hillary or her supporters ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:38 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 48. mtn you are a prophet |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:39 PM Response to Reply #48 |
| 78. "You said things would turn around starting on Thursday" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JackORoses
|
Sun Apr-13-08 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. How many delegates did she gain on him today? ....None. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Genevieve
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 51. And Obama just picked up another super-delegate today -- |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| PetraPooh
|
Sun Apr-13-08 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. As usual no links for validation or consideration. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:55 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 62. Rasmussen |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bowens43
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. GIve it up, its over. Hillary lost. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 38. I guess you don't know how the superdelegates work |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Garbo 2004
|
Sun Apr-13-08 06:40 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 90. Forbes figured Obama would need only about 33% of current uncommitted SD's for nom. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| PurityOfEssence
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 22. This one goes to eleven |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cali
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 23. The OP, being such a delicate little flower |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:06 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 31. cali where in heck do you come up with all these sci-fi theories of yours? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| PseudoIntellect
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:11 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 33. It's the truth if you ignore Gallup poll. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| indimuse
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:59 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 64. LOL!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cali
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:21 PM Response to Reply #64 |
| 73. ooh, it's the cute wittle race baiter |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cali
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:19 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 71. the OP endlessly calls Obama a bigot |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:33 PM Response to Reply #71 |
| 77. cali please calm down & get a grip on reality. Try some alternate nostril breathing. It really helps |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| PseudoIntellect
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 25. Bittergate actually made a difference as per Ras poll? Wow. Not in Gallup, though. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BzaDem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:13 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 35. People are upset about the "clinging to guns/religion", not the bitter remark, and you know it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:44 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 58. Actually, sadly they don't know it. They are that out of touch |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| PseudoIntellect
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:11 PM Response to Reply #58 |
| 66. Sorry, but everything I see on the web these days is about being upset about |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AllentownJake
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
| 28. The sky is falling |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| npincus
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 36. Now, don't feel bitter because the only pollyou can quote is RAZberry |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| book_worm
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 37. your daily rantings against Obama are revolting |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #37 |
| 50. What ranting? I merely posted polls lol |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mtnsnake
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:40 PM Response to Reply #50 |
| 79. hahaha, that's hilarious that you're getting accused of ranting for posting number polls |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MadBadger
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 40. You know, you get all pissy at me for what you call cherry picking |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 52. Lame hnmf |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MadBadger
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:42 PM Response to Reply #52 |
| 55. I dont know that you dont check Gallup. But its always reported here. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:57 PM Response to Reply #55 |
| 63. Once I was told about it I took it into account |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MadBadger
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:28 PM Response to Reply #63 |
| 75. Snipergate didnt really takeoff until Monday. This took off on Friday |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cessna Invesco Palin
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 42. Oh hai. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| OzarkDem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
| 43. His unfavorables are as high as Clinton's |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jackson_dem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #43 |
| 54. Obamites thought he was immune to political gravity |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| grantcart
|
Sun Apr-13-08 04:42 PM Response to Reply #54 |
| 56. last laugh is on who? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| OzarkDem
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:22 PM Response to Reply #56 |
| 74. Still a dead heat |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| datopbanana
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:44 PM Response to Reply #74 |
| 81. Obama can't close? Clinton can't even close on getting in position to close. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| datopbanana
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:45 PM Response to Reply #81 |
| 82. PS Obama doesn't have to close. The clock runs out in June. So Clinton has to close. She's not. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| datopbanana
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:49 PM Response to Reply #82 |
| 84. PS to my PS. There's no such thing as "closing." These are unique voters each time. This is just a.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Justice Is Comin
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 76. These string bean groupies just live in |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Raffi Ella
|
Sun Apr-13-08 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 80. woo |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sueragingroz
|
Sun Apr-13-08 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 86. If only he had waited 8 years... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JoFerret
|
Sun Apr-13-08 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 92. Obama folk - let's for a moment |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| woolldog
|
Mon Apr-14-08 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 94. Rasmussen Daily 4/14: Obama 48 (+3) Clinton 44 (-2) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mckeown1128
|
Mon Apr-14-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #94 |
| 99. Oh.. SNAP. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Egnever
|
Mon Apr-14-08 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
| 96. hows that elitist thing working out today? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| gcomeau
|
Mon Apr-14-08 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 98. This is amusing. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| kmsarvis
|
Mon Apr-14-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #98 |
| 100. You gotta give Jackson-Dem credit for trying so hard !!! n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| woolldog
|
Mon Apr-14-08 01:47 PM Response to Reply #100 |
| 102. he's one of the most intellectually dishonest posters on here. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JackORoses
|
Mon Apr-14-08 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 101. poor poor jacksoff-dem. Hillary makes him look like a buffoon once again. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hayu_lol
|
Mon Apr-14-08 01:56 PM Response to Reply #101 |
| 103. Gee willikers, ain't it time... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JackORoses
|
Mon Apr-14-08 02:06 PM Response to Reply #103 |
| 105. hayu_guys! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AX10
|
Mon Apr-14-08 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
| 104. K & R! Seeing that the Obambots won't do it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Feb 24th 2026, 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC