Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry Says Aides Don't Know What They're Talking About

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
salonghorn70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:35 PM
Original message
Kerry Says Aides Don't Know What They're Talking About
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. How about a hint for those of us that don't want to sign up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. VP search.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Sign up without disclosure via bug me not:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. He's starting to sound like
"I want to restore trust and credibility to the White House, and I hope that the person that I choose is going to be somebody who matches the expectations of the country about the kind of leadership that people want," Kerry said.

like Wesley "We need a higher standard of leadership" Clark

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Same feeling here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. It's Edwards: "somebody who matched the expectation of the country
about the kind of leadership that people want."

The majority want Edwards and expect a Kerry/Edwards ticket.

You know, you can spin this stuff every which way from Sunday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Like you're doing, you mean? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoopie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. How does a campaign that's been saying
since February that it wants a VP with foreign policy credentials spin into Edwards?

If people are "expecting" a Kerry/Edwards ticket, then they must be hoping for trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here's a few snippets...
Kerry Demands Secrecy Amid VP Search

By RON FOURNIER
The Associated Press
Thursday, June 17, 2004; 5:22 PM

WASHINGTON - John Kerry sought to curb rampant speculation Thursday about his vice presidential search, taking issue with leaks from campaign aides "who don't know what they're talking about."

"I'm the only person who knows when I will" announce a running mate "or what even direction I might take. And I intend to keep it that way," the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee said as fresh clues about his intentions emerged.

Kerry, a four-term senator with a history of publicly chastising his staff, smiled and chuckled as he recalled that he "read with amusement about aides who don't know what they're talking about with respect to my schedule" for announcing a running mate. A day earlier, his meeting with Rep. Dick Gephardt became public despite efforts to keep it under wraps.

-snip-

The official was relating recent conversations with two senior Kerry advisers, one of whom talks almost daily with the candidate about his running-mate search. He said both advisers mentioned Gephardt and Sens. John Edwards of North Carolina and Evan Bayh of Indiana as the type of "safe" candidates getting strong consideration.

-snip-

ANYBODY BUT BUSH

Click here for "ANYBODY BUT BUSH", and other fair and balanced yet stunning buttons, magnets and stickers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kerry's problem: too many of his aides have their own agenda
Edited on Thu Jun-17-04 04:57 PM by dolstein
The Kerry campaign has been leaking like a sieve for quite some time. Some of his aides obviously don't want Edwards to be VP, so they've been talking to reporters (off the record, natch) at every opportunity to tell them how Kerry personally doesn't like Edwards. Other aides have been deliberately playing up Gephardt's prospects. If these aides had any real respect for the candidate they purportedly work for, they wouldn't be doing this.

ON EDIT: Man, is this article hilarious. It starts with Kerry chastising his aides about talking to the press, but then it has a bunch of off-the-record comments from still more Democratic officials talking about the VP election. Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I dunno. It sort of keeps people off balance. That's kind of
fun. And it's great that Kerry came out and said this. Really funny, especially for those of us wise enough not to believe every rumor and piece of speculation we hear on the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daveskilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. well a former dean staffer I know has been saying for months now
Since the Iowa caucus she has been telling me that Kerry only won there when he struck a deal with gephardt (weeks before it) to have gephardts delegates switch to kerry across the state at the last minute and then gephardt would drop out in exchange for the VP spot.

Since then i have heard this from 2 other former dean staffers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Has anyone heard this coming from the Gephardt camp? Or an unbiased source
Coming exclusively from the Dean camp gives no assurance of validity. Sounds a lot like excuse-making.

If it's true, it should be verifiable. If all those Gephardt delegates were told to change their votes - don't you think that might have gotten out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daveskilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. could be sour grapes but....
they all came back from Iowa furious about it and the story hasn't changed for them since that this was the deal in Iowa. Gephart would seem a weak choice for vp (to me anyway - gephart and lieberman scared me until they dropped out) so if he is the choice I know I will wonder if my deaniac friends were right on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. But what was their proof?
Edited on Thu Jun-17-04 05:29 PM by chimpymustgo
(see my earlier posts, below)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still_Loves_John Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Thats ridiculous
He won by too wide a margin. Kerry won because some people actually like him. I can't stand this sentiment that the only way Kerry could have won was by striking some kind of deal. I mean honestly, there were like three people who were gonna vote Gep; it would have had no effect. And it's not like Gephardt had any control over his constituents; look at the Edwards/Kucinich deal--people, for the most part, don't caucus for someone else just because their candidate told them to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. And Kerry's poll numbers were rising daily. His crowds were getting larger
As were Edwards.

Not to mention how Dean and Gep committed murder-suicide. And Dean was clearly starting to unravel in that week leading up to the caucuses.

The Deaners should stop spreading that one. Real disservice to Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daveskilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. very good point - sad to see them crash in flames together
dean spent most of his cash there fighting gephardt and never could recover. My dean friends of course say that was part of the plan that gephart would knock dean out in a kamikazee run of spending.

then I remind them of the good doctors tarzan impersonation that just may have had a teensy effect on his ability to recover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daveskilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. that sounds right but...
on the ground in Iowa there were gephart people actually passing out kerry flyers in districts where gephart was polling low and even in a few where he had a shot of pulling a delegate or two. I think Kerry did pull support on his own and may have won iowa anyway but there is definitely some truth to the rumour from the dean folks since gephardt's people were actively working for Kerry in parts of Iowa BEFORE the caucus.

btw I am a reasonably impartial observer as a non US citizen who supported carol mosely braun then just hoped like hell it wouldnt be lieberman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Dean staffers, who are of course totally disinterested
observers, que no?

Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. The democratic official could be Zell for heaven's sakes
That is the problem with this nonsense anonymous source.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty Pragmatist Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. A little more discipline from the aides
would be a good sign. Can you imagine leaks like this coming from the Bush-Halliburton camp? They'd be Ward Boss of Eastern Baghdad within an hour.

We're all starting to look a little overconfident, considering this is probably a 51-49 election. Let Carville get a little fundamental on the Kerry aides' asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. According to Novak on CNN, HIS sources said Gep was close to getting it,
everybody in gep's camp was psyched - but some of Kerry's aides talked him out of Gep - saying he's too boring.

According to Novak, Gep's out, Edwards is in.

I didn't even start a thread when I heard. Just more speculation. Kerry's aides really are showing a disturbing lack of discipline. And that includes Chris Heinz offering his opinions publicly.

Loose lips sink ships.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TSIAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. But I thought ABC said it wouldn't be Edwards
Seriously, I don't buy into much of the speculation. Some articles are saying Clark's the odds-on favorite. Others think it will be Nunn.

Even though I favor Edwards, I could be satisfied with any number of guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. baseless rumor started by a Clarkie with no link provided
what else is new
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. I agree. Though they may be putting out feelers?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
26. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
27. It's totally going to be Vilsack
how would his name even come up if he wasn't JK's guy all along? Who the hell has even heard of this nobody?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wjsander Donating Member (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
29. Clarkies, don't panic!!!
Just ignore this piece of news like any other one that doesn't mention Clark as the front-runner.

Now go ahead and celebrate his future vice presidency!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 31st 2024, 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC