|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:19 PM Original message |
The silence from Gore and from Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarjorieG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. Many substantial thinkers have enndorsed with real excitement and trust. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PoliticalAmazon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
55. I think Gore and Edwards are just disgusted. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:10 PM Response to Reply #55 |
64. Probably |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diamond Dog (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
2. Because Hillary's substantial. In fact, she's so substantial that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
3. in 2004 Gore was among the first to endorse Dean. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. It's well known that Gore can't stand Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
4. I think that your post in assinine........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 04:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
35. If that's all it is, then why haven't they endorsed Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calmblueocean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:45 PM Response to Reply #35 |
72. Different answers for each one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodbailey (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 08:45 AM Response to Reply #72 |
88. OR, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 11:15 AM Response to Reply #72 |
110. Maybe Obama should't have mocked Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knixphan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 08:18 PM Response to Reply #35 |
81. see #3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DebbieCDC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
5. If you think those "specific questions" about lapel pins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
42. Not to enlighten the electorate but more to expose the upcoming attacks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:13 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. It's not the corporate media's job to expose upcoming partisan attacks, it's their job to enlighten |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zalinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
6. Honey, the Clintons have been hated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:34 PM Response to Reply #6 |
17. what nonsense. Hill and Bill are as status quo as they come. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas Hill Country (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #17 |
28. well, i would say two things to that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-24-08 10:18 AM Response to Reply #28 |
126. shhh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 04:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
34. They weren't status quo in 1992. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 04:58 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. And, in fact, before Bill got real deep in this campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:02 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Yes, Obama reminds me a lot of Clinton in 1992. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:41 PM Response to Reply #17 |
59. They weren't status quo when they first went there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 07:13 PM Response to Reply #6 |
74. How dare he get into office and DEEP-SIX the very investigations into GHWBush that GOT HIM THERE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 08:52 AM Response to Reply #74 |
89. Maybe he was going to do it....but was stopped when Hillary was accused of murder. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 09:41 AM Response to Reply #89 |
96. Dems had far more power in 1993 than ANY Dem has now. The dog and pony shows of the 90s |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 09:59 AM Response to Reply #96 |
97. The citizens will have to do it on their own...Through outside action groups. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 10:20 AM Response to Reply #97 |
99. It's a huge problem and we must resolve it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 11:02 PM Response to Reply #99 |
113. I am hesitant about too many investigation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-24-08 10:11 AM Response to Reply #113 |
123. Valid point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TragedyandHope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
7. Deafening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Interesting theory...We wouldn't want Obama to be seen as the first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
44. Oh, I would put Kennedy and Kerry way ahead of Edwards in terms of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoFerret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:20 PM Response to Reply #44 |
49. And gore and Edwards have the integrity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
psychopomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 11:03 AM Response to Reply #7 |
109. I think you are right about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
9. I think you're no mindreader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beregond2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
11. Uh huh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:43 PM Response to Reply #11 |
60. I think it is because Hillary says she will Nuke Iran. Her supporters appearently like the idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goldcanyonaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
12. I believe that both Gore and Edwards wish to be viewed as the parties elders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
32. "We've never had anything but white men running for President." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 04:56 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. My mother just loved Chisholm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:40 PM Response to Reply #39 |
58. Mine too! She fucking ROCKED. Too bad this country wasn't ready to get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:38 PM Response to Reply #39 |
70. One of the absolutely greatest women of all time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 07:57 PM Response to Reply #12 |
79. Edwards has no real claim to party leader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
13. Personally, I think they're quiet because they're deferring to the voters themselves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilith Velkor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 07:05 PM Response to Reply #13 |
73. That wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democracy1st (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
14. Stop with your BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Saturday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
16. To tell the truth... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
18. I think it's pretty straightforward |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hola (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
19. Gore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #19 |
36. Here, please educate yourself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:19 PM Response to Reply #19 |
47. But Gore lost in 2000 partly because of Bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shakespeare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
20. I think they're waiting until their endorsements are NEEDED. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
21. Don't know about Gore but edwards was very clear that he "won't' endorse anyone that doesn't have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 04:00 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Saracat, I think you nailed it. They're not satisfied with either. Gore/Edwards 08!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 04:12 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Hear! Hear! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:22 PM Response to Reply #27 |
51. Yes, this would be a winning ticket (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodbailey (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 08:43 AM Response to Reply #27 |
87. Certainly Gore at the top of the ticket. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. Edwards won't endorse anyone who isn't Edwards then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 04:23 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. He was the best choice! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 12:07 AM Response to Reply #21 |
83. And now we hear that Elizabeth may campaign for Hillary in NC (eom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 09:24 AM Response to Reply #83 |
90. I didn't hear that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 11:06 PM Response to Reply #90 |
115. Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-24-08 10:12 AM Response to Reply #115 |
124. Thanks! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibraLiz1973 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 10:43 AM Response to Reply #21 |
101. I agree Sara |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nancyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
22. They're just waiting...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
23. I think your analysis is way off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kokonoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
24. All these states are generating new voters, its a nice warm up. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
25. Wow! That's one of the most "logic challenged" posts that I've read here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unc70 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:00 PM Response to Reply #25 |
62. Many Edwards supporters have issues with Clinton and Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:19 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Thanks for reporting this information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 12:18 AM Response to Reply #62 |
84. And this is why I think it was important to raise these questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 09:27 AM Response to Reply #84 |
91. It's ironic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Window (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
26. It's more likely they were asked by Dean and/or Pelosi to wait, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
31. Why then, did they not back someone else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 04:46 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. Well, presumably Edwards favored his own campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
38. Might be healthcare for Edwards and nuclear energy for Gore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:28 PM Response to Reply #38 |
53. I think that nuclear energy should be debated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
43. I'm glad Al has stayed out of the crossfire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoFerret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
45. It's a very reasonable hypothesis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
48. What in the world do you base this "analysis" on -- besides your own prejudices? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoFerret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:22 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. It's a very plausible theory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:33 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. Not really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:10 PM Response to Reply #54 |
63. Relying on advisors - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:37 PM Response to Reply #63 |
69. Well, it worked out the way they wanted it to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 07:24 PM Response to Reply #69 |
76. Yes, judging by their measures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoFerret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 08:16 PM Response to Reply #54 |
80. Not a plausble theory in some aspects. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 08:26 AM Response to Reply #80 |
86. I just assumed he was a lawyer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 09:33 AM Response to Reply #86 |
93. I could see him as President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 09:39 AM Response to Reply #93 |
95. Interesting idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 10:16 AM Response to Reply #95 |
98. The basic scenario is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 10:40 AM Response to Reply #98 |
100. I guess that could work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 10:55 AM Response to Reply #100 |
104. The deal might have to be very complicated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 11:02 AM Response to Reply #104 |
108. I think you're confused on convention dates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 12:10 PM Response to Reply #108 |
111. You're right, I was thinking it was in July. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 11:15 PM Response to Reply #98 |
116. Fascinating scenario. Thanks (eom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Tiger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
52. You may be right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
56. It has been interesting watching.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
57. I think it's because they are waiting to see who can rise above all the BS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 05:43 PM Response to Reply #57 |
61. Actually I believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
66. Gore did endorse Dean. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johnny__Motown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
67. They just don't want Carville to bite them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
68. Wow! That was sublimely stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
71. Maybe they're just waiting to back the nominee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
75. They are waiting to see if they have to be the 'party elders' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 09:36 AM Response to Reply #75 |
94. There will very likely be a brokered convention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibraLiz1973 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 10:44 AM Response to Reply #94 |
102. Keep praying for this because it is the ONLY way out of this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 10:56 AM Response to Reply #102 |
106. I'm in complete agreement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
77. gore does not like the clintons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
78. Jealous of Bill Clinton? Very possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoFerret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-22-08 08:36 PM Response to Reply #78 |
82. I think they were jealous and then found |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodbailey (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
85. Perhaps Gore doesn't want to endorse, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 11:21 PM Response to Reply #85 |
118. This may be the clearest suggestion that he will be open to be drafted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-24-08 10:16 AM Response to Reply #118 |
125. He hasn't denied it, really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
92. In other words, they see the same non-choices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibraLiz1973 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 10:45 AM Response to Reply #92 |
103. Praying that one of them will. In an ideal world, both of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndependentDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
105. i have a strange feeling that Edwards is going to support Clinton in NC... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 11:23 PM Response to Reply #105 |
119. Last night it was suggested that Elizabeth will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndependentDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 11:43 PM Response to Reply #119 |
122. seems like just speculation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harry Monroe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
107. And oh what a "dream ticket" that would have been!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andrea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 12:11 PM Response to Reply #107 |
112. It's still possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruby slippers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 11:04 PM Response to Original message |
114. Is Elizabeth still going to endorse Hillary then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mb7588a (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
117. also, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleyAppendage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
120. I think your hypothesis is nothing but a Hillary shill/plant to cast doubt upon Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-23-08 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
121. The problem with your theory is that Senator Obama has substance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Jun 19th 2024, 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC