|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
lwcon
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 10:20 AM Original message |
Confessions of an Obama Skeptic, Part I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
1. self-delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaJones
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
2. in '04 he advocated pre-emptive strikes against Iran if the radical clerics in charge gained control |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilith Velkor
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #2 |
65. Don't you know that only retaliatory strikes are teh evil? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 09:22 AM Response to Reply #65 |
120. don't you know, retalitory strikes do not equate to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 09:58 AM Response to Reply #2 |
127. what he actually said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dpbrown
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
3. Awesomely written |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 11:34 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoFerret
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
4. Excellent post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DazedandConfused
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
6. Thats a great post.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 12:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Not to mention all the punctuation! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DazedandConfused
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 02:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
51. yes, and puncuation....and excellent spelling too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbayer
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
7. Wow, a piece with substance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
29. you think that is substance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbayer
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #29 |
40. Why yes I do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. I consider THAT to be Clinton campaign BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbayer
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 02:16 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. That does not surprise me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #47 |
55. the vote was held three weeks before AN election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbayer
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #55 |
64. Your point is right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 04:49 PM Response to Reply #64 |
70. Kinda one reason why Obama supporters want this to be over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoFerret
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 03:22 PM Response to Reply #44 |
164. Your post and your opinion say a deal about you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 07:15 PM Response to Reply #44 |
170. A and B |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 01:27 PM Response to Reply #29 |
159. It's crap. Nothing new. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr. Hawk
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
9. pretty soon we're gonna figure out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIdaho
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
10. Learn to edit your work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 12:47 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. I prefer just "less" when it comes to snark. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIdaho
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 12:54 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. See? I knew you could do it! nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
11. Very well written. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
12. You've got a lot of words, there. Here are 15 more: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. And one of those words refute what was said in the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 12:50 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Hillary voted for the Iraq War. Hillary still refuses to admit it was a mistake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 12:58 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Again, you offer nothing to refute what the OP said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ka hrnt
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 03:04 PM Response to Reply #20 |
58. A talking point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 04:48 PM Response to Reply #20 |
69. Hillary voted for the Iraq War. Hillary still refuses to admit it was a mistake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 09:30 AM Response to Reply #20 |
121. And Hillary could have voted against the war and didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:31 PM Response to Reply #15 |
33. the OP made his/her case by being a smart-a$$ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #33 |
41. So refute it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 02:28 PM Response to Reply #41 |
49. heaven forbid that I use ad hominems against an OP full of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 02:42 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. You are asserting he did more than just one speech |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 03:01 PM Response to Reply #52 |
57. but it does make for a double standard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #57 |
61. You haven't blown any large holes in his argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 04:30 PM Response to Reply #61 |
66. you are undermining yourself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 04:35 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. You are spinning in the wind at this point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 05:08 PM Response to Reply #67 |
73. you got me there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 02:25 PM Response to Reply #73 |
162. Still ad hominem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 03:09 PM Response to Reply #49 |
60. "An OP full of ad hominems????" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 05:00 PM Response to Reply #60 |
72. upon re-reading it appears that I misspoke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 08:45 AM Response to Reply #72 |
115. Who's "Hugh Hillary"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 09:50 AM Response to Reply #72 |
125. So that means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 01:22 PM Response to Reply #125 |
155. nice of you to condense the essence of strawman arguments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 02:02 PM Response to Reply #33 |
46. Try again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 02:38 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. see the link above |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 02:43 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Exactly what you said they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libbygurl
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
13. WOW, just WOW. Thank you for laying it all out so clearly for all to see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 12:35 PM Response to Reply #13 |
151. "A thinking writer or sumpin'" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ka hrnt
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
17. Good post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
18. who cares what you think since you bought into hillaryhub propaganda? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 12:58 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. My apologies for having the wrong opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. I just don't get someone going from Edwards to Clinton - he reamed her on her lobbyist connections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #22 |
30. Let me guess...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #22 |
59. it isn't religion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemExpat
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 06:57 PM Response to Reply #59 |
75. Thanks, great post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suzie
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 01:23 AM Response to Reply #59 |
94. Perhaps there's some new code to politics that this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas
![]() |
Sun Apr-27-08 02:10 PM Response to Reply #94 |
186. maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suzie
![]() |
Mon Apr-28-08 12:10 AM Response to Reply #186 |
187. I have no ideas about 'cultural war candidates' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 10:46 AM Response to Reply #59 |
138. Very well said. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 11:03 AM Response to Reply #59 |
142. A very thoughtful comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. You Fail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. and you suck, so what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:05 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Congratulations on your kindergarten level of debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal_rxstudent
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 11:17 PM Response to Reply #27 |
85. ....hehehe.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 12:48 AM Response to Reply #27 |
93. hey look - a jackass pointing out a jackass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #93 |
165. Fail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pecwae
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
23. Great post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ksoze
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
26. "unlike Hillary, Obama voted against the war" - Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Erm, did you *read* the post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemGa
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
31. Great post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbmk
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
32. Well, he wasn't exactly quiet on it in 2002 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #32 |
43. I like that he was against the AUMF/war then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scriptor Ignotus
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
34. so what are these? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbmk
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
35. There is a little more words to work with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
36. You highlighted my greatest doubt about Obama advancing progressive causes if he wins. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDoorbellRang
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
37. Here are some items to help alleviate your skepticism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDoorbellRang
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 10:38 AM Response to Reply #37 |
137. Better link to video clip I posted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbmk
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
38. And just to assess the mans foreign policy judgement, watch him call the war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damonm
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 02:17 PM Response to Reply #38 |
48. This needs wider viewing - please put this up as an OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terran
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
39. To be honest, the whole war-vote thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 09:18 AM Response to Reply #39 |
119. 57% of Democrats voted "Nay" on the IWR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
42. brilliant post - k and r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
datopbanana
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 05:14 AM Response to Reply #42 |
105. sigh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
45. here's a start.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 12:01 AM Response to Reply #45 |
88. I guess Obama's web site |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scriptor Ignotus
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 11:54 AM Response to Reply #88 |
150. those are transcripts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #150 |
166. Have you been to the Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
datopbanana
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 05:16 AM Response to Reply #45 |
106. HRC zealots only use spin as their sources. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 07:19 PM Response to Reply #106 |
171. Wow, that's some kind of rebuttal! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #45 |
160. Yes. Believing he wasn't a US Senate candidate before 2003 is a bit naive. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
54. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
56. riddled with lies and distortions. The failure of your cadre. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 03:30 PM Response to Reply #56 |
63. Replete with quotes and factual annotations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDoorbellRang
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 10:35 AM Response to Reply #63 |
136. I answered some of his concerns in post #37, but no one has responded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 07:50 PM Response to Reply #56 |
79. "The failure of your cadre"? WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VotesForWomen
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
62. good one! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluetrain
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
68. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Cornyn
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
71. I'm also a bit of an Obama skeptic, but wholeheartedly disbelieve in Hillary (BTW, Obama won Texas) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
74. Rebuttal of an Obama skeptic, part I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 07:49 PM Response to Reply #74 |
78. These are pretty flimsy, y'know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemExpat
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
76. Great post, lwcon! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 07:27 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 12:04 AM Response to Reply #77 |
89. I'd like to go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
satireV
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 02:52 AM Response to Reply #77 |
99. The fish rots from the head! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doc03
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
80. If Obama was the Senator from Illinois in 2001 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beezlebum
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 08:47 AM Response to Reply #80 |
116. vomit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeFleur1
![]() |
Sun Apr-27-08 09:45 AM Response to Reply #80 |
185. Wait!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
81. Dayum, you must be a real radical rebel! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 10:52 AM Response to Reply #81 |
139. I agree with your every word! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sun Apr-27-08 08:32 AM Response to Reply #81 |
183. Thats how I see it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sun Apr-27-08 09:18 AM Response to Reply #81 |
184. It's most regrettable that this campaign between two centrists has morphed into... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mezzo
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
82. you mean, there is NO LINK to BO's speech other than him SAYING he gave it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 10:27 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. Yes there is....There are many eye witnesses and he also discussed it in a 2002 Interview on TV. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 11:09 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. It is funny how it seems no two people have the same recollection of "the speech" he is running on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 12:07 AM Response to Reply #84 |
90. It's called induced memory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 02:05 AM Response to Reply #90 |
97. Maybe that is what "change we can believe in" is. After saying it enough you can believe in it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 03:58 AM Response to Reply #97 |
102. This is beyond hilarious, its almost twilight zone material. lol/. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 06:14 AM Response to Reply #97 |
109. Remember, it's "change you can believe in" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDoorbellRang
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #83 |
156. Thanks, Frenchie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mezzo
![]() |
Mon Apr-28-08 09:23 AM Response to Reply #83 |
188. Again, I repeat, since you didn't answer the question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal_rxstudent
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 11:36 PM Response to Original message |
86. Wow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Fri Apr-25-08 11:58 PM Response to Reply #86 |
87. I would have to take mass quantities of Nexium... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 12:16 AM Response to Reply #87 |
91. Concerns me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 12:17 AM Response to Original message |
92. Thank you, sir. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gore1FL
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
95. Just a few issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluesbassman
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 02:46 AM Response to Reply #95 |
98. Objection. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gore1FL
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 09:47 AM Response to Reply #98 |
123. I agree with your disclaimer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluesbassman
![]() |
Sun Apr-27-08 12:24 AM Response to Reply #123 |
180. Your points are well taken. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
satireV
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 03:05 AM Response to Reply #95 |
100. The Iranian Revolutionary Guard issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gore1FL
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 09:49 AM Response to Reply #100 |
124. I am not sure a blog about an op-ed is really any better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
satireV
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 01:27 PM Response to Reply #124 |
158. That was the actual op-ed posted in a blog. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gore1FL
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 03:21 PM Response to Reply #100 |
163. Here is a problem though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #163 |
172. That's quite a feather in Obama's cap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gore1FL
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 07:53 PM Response to Reply #172 |
175. sure beats voting for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 08:06 PM Response to Reply #175 |
176. Thanks for the praise, but I haven't seen where... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gore1FL
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 08:19 PM Response to Reply #176 |
177. I'd vote for her if it came down to it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 06:42 AM Response to Reply #95 |
110. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gore1FL
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 09:32 AM Response to Reply #110 |
122. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
96. It's a shame that you tried so hard, and spent so much time formatting your argument for DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemVet
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 05:21 AM Response to Reply #96 |
107. Won't further entertain your crap? That's because you have no argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 10:24 AM Response to Reply #107 |
133. No, this entire piece is refuting a misrepresentation, and is therefore crippled from the start |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 06:58 AM Response to Reply #96 |
111. I've seen many examples of folks believing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crimsonblue
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 03:53 AM Response to Original message |
101. Skeptic is a bit harsh of a word to use... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 07:05 AM Response to Reply #101 |
112. "Fucking moron.... We do not need your ilk to win this election" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beezlebum
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 09:05 AM Response to Reply #112 |
117. "Aah, unity" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 10:09 AM Response to Reply #117 |
131. Sorry for not engaging in a nuanced debate about... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 04:01 AM Response to Original message |
103. I haven't clicked every link, but you obviously |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 04:44 AM Response to Original message |
104. That's 2 hours of formatting you will never get back. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 07:09 AM Response to Reply #104 |
113. There's a lot I'll never get back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 10:26 AM Response to Reply #113 |
134. Thank you again for taking the time on this. I pray some folks will pull their heads out of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 10:34 AM Response to Reply #113 |
135. How the hell do you strangle misogyny out of that reply? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 10:59 AM Response to Reply #135 |
140. I was referring to the overall dynamics of this campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 11:09 AM Response to Reply #140 |
143. It wasn't my post, but you've again leapfrogged all the rules of logic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #143 |
148. Impressively, the words do roll off her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #148 |
149. I mean the part about Hillary blowing off Obama by saying he's nothing but 'just words' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SouthAmerica
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 05:42 AM Response to Original message |
108. I have not given up on my candidate - The Real Thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 07:17 AM Response to Reply #108 |
114. I hear ya |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #114 |
147. In the world of happy endings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluebellbaby
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
118. Great post, good luck with the "O" lovers here, they don't like the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
126. She's "impressing you more and more as the campaign goes on"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 10:07 AM Response to Reply #126 |
129. This "attempt to destroy" meme is such poppycock |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 11:40 AM Response to Reply #129 |
145. But you're talking reality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 12:38 PM Response to Reply #145 |
152. Someday this chapter in Democratic politics will be written up definitively.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 01:11 PM Response to Reply #129 |
153. Meme? I've watched it and read it, it's not a "meme". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
128. recommend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
130. That was awesome. Thank you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Steely_Dan
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
132. Well-Written and On The Mark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gaspee
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
141. The responses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiva
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
144. Excellent OP! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemExpat
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
146. The first bookmarked OP/thread in weeks....where's Part II? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
154. I'm sorry I'm too late to recommend, but I can kick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
157. I wish there were a way to deduct a recommend. I would vote -1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 02:03 PM Response to Reply #157 |
161. Thanks for the kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
167. Is Obama part of DLC, part of its leadership, part of moving party to right . . . ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 07:12 PM Response to Reply #167 |
168. Did Obama vote as HRC did to clear the way for Bush to attack IRAN . . . ???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 07:15 PM Response to Reply #168 |
169. Is Obama on Sibel Edmonds "dirty dozen" list of senators obstructing investigations --??HRC is--!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sun Apr-27-08 08:19 AM Response to Reply #169 |
182. Has Hillary "Destroy the Party" Clinton --??completely slimed her opponent--??!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #168 |
173. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 07:41 PM Response to Reply #167 |
174. More or less, yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
susankh4
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
178. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kerry-is-my-prez
![]() |
Sat Apr-26-08 11:33 PM Response to Original message |
179. Great post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
egarcia76
![]() |
Sun Apr-27-08 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
181. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 05:09 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC