|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:39 PM Original message |
Reading some of the reactions on CNN and DU to the Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olkaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. Hmm. I didn't see any of that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PoliticalAmazon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
36. I didn't see it, either. I'd like to see some examples, if available. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. Read the links. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PoliticalAmazon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 04:47 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. DU link is not valid. I'm interested in the DU links; that is the board with which I am familiar. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 05:10 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. corrected link. Sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. Agreed. What they've done is actually unifying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:42 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. I agree. I am pleased they didn't endorse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RiverStone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
26. second or third that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
writes3000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
3. I've never insulted them and I don't see a deluge of insults on DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
4. does John owe an endorsement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalon6 (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:42 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. He has no control over his delegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 03:40 PM Response to Reply #5 |
37. He can officially "release" his delegates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
6. Haven't seen any criticism of them here for the non-endorsement... Obama folks are thrilled with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:43 PM Original message |
I saw criticism... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:43 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Don't be disingenuous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:49 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. I'm not. I'm thrilled that the Edwards didn't endorse....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countingbluecars (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
8. Are you making this up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
29. Did you read the links? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mags (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
9. Just wait, he will be called a racist before it is over. Everybody is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalon6 (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I have never heard Obama used the word "racist" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
12. I am absolutely elated that Edwards did not Endorse at all... Been saying since... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
13. Politicians are a dime a dozen. STATESMEN however, not so much. When we have true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:47 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Sorry but I am offended that you would even mention Obama in the company of Gore and Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:50 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Nope. I agree. My FIRST CHOICE was Edwards! I was left with Hillary and Obama.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
14. still my first choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
15. Wow, You have a tendency to be "embarrassed" and/or "ashamed" of the amorphous "US" a lot these |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:50 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. I am not speaking for everyone, just myself as Democrat, which I have the right to do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brundle_Fly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
16. John Edwards would have been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KSinTX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
19. Why would your pride in party be affected by a bunch of jackasses? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #19 |
28. Because I think it is a shame we have so many uncouth jackasses? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KSinTX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. It is truly a shame that uncivilized behavior exists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 05:32 PM Response to Reply #19 |
45. Because the jackasses seem to have taken over here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KSinTX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 06:02 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. But Bake, they're just people, not the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-07-08 09:54 AM Response to Reply #47 |
53. Every single tombstone thread gets locked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
featherman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
22. Abuse? I see no abuse on DU. If there is some on CNN could be mischief |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
23. I am proud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
24. The only time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lojasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
25. I have no problem with no endorsement. EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
27. Yes, and it's a shame that we must choose between two negatives: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
30. Haven't seen any of that at all here at DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. I posted links and some of the nastiest were deleted but some are still there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 02:30 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Well, I suppose every group has a certain number of idiots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 02:38 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. If you were one of the Edwards stalwarts, this nastiness was evident from the beginning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
33. K & R for John & Elizabeth! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
38. I didn't see any piling on of the Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 04:03 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. I posted links. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
39. I think sitting it out is the only thing they could do now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
43. You think it's bad here, you should have seen the remarks on talkingpointsmemo.com |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newmajority (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
46. I have nothing bad to say about our next Attorney General |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
48. Edwards was the first to go negative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barack the house (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
49. They are jujstkeepingtheir options open I don't fault them for that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barack the house (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
50. They are jujstkeeping their options open I don't fault them for that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
51. Nonsense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elidor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-06-08 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
52. I was always amazed that our only viable populist candidate was even leaving open the possibility of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 23rd 2024, 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC