kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-20-04 12:46 PM
Original message |
| Some questions about John O'Neill and his book ... |
|
that a skeptical press should have asked. When did he decide to write the book? Was it last year and he decided to wait until it was closer to the election for maximum impact? Did he confer with anyone in the Republican Party about writing this book? We know he was assisted by the freeper Corsi, but was anyone else involved? A skeptical journalist would ask such questions? I think they would be surprised to know the answers.
|
| w13rd0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-20-04 12:52 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. They could ask the questions... |
|
...but I'm fairly certain the answers given would be nowhere near the "truth" of the matter.
|
| spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-20-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Hey, you're acting like the press has some kind of resposibility!!!! |
| olddem43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-20-04 01:02 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. What make you think O'Neill would tell the truth on this? |
|
Or would you just assume that everything he says is a lie so when he says he didn't confer with anyone in the Republican Party, it means he did.
|
| kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-20-04 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. I assume the questions should be asked.... |
|
and they can lie or tell the truth. Or would you just assume that it doesn't matter because he's just going to lie anyway so there really is no need to ask the question??
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Mon Feb 23rd 2026, 07:00 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
