Bush's COCAINE Use or Kerry's WAR Record?

[Placebo]

Which do you think there is more 'evidence' of?

It boggles my mind that the media can give so much airtime to the SWIFT BOAT LIARS FOR BUSH, where there seems to be no evidence, compared to something like oh, Bush's cocaine use, which there seems to be far more evidence of.

Or better yet, bush's 'war record' (or lack there of) which just got brushed under the carpet asap in favour of the FALSE charges against Kerry's heroic service in Vietnam.

And if someone in the media calls BUSH a 'VIETNAM VETERAN' one more time I am going to puke. :puke:

[wurzel]

1. There has been unprecedented media collusion in this attack on Kerry.

How else can anyone explain how a platinum plated draft dodger, and a suspected deserter can get a total free pass, while a war hero with a half dozen medals is pilloried. The attack was clearly planned and orchestrated with the media. Never mind "Swiftboat liars" collusion with the Bush campaign, what about the news network collusion with Bush?

[Jane Austin]

2. They all say that was settled in 2000. :(

n/t