59millionmorons
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-28-04 10:38 PM
Original message |
| Both Reagan in 84 and Clinton in 96 had 21 point leads at this time. |
|
Edited on Sat Aug-28-04 10:48 PM by demdem
|
Massacure
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-28-04 10:45 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. That probably means we have this in the bag when Kerry starts beating on |
DemMother
(422 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-28-04 10:45 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Thanks. Love the stats that put things in perspective. |
coloradodem2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-28-04 11:32 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Still. Clinton had a more consistent lead on Bush in 1992. |
|
This does worry me a little
|
59millionmorons
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-29-04 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
That was a three way race with a serious contender in Perot. Even the fact that Clinton the challeger was ahead it shows if you are an incumbent and are tide at this time in the election you are in serious trouble. Also Ford was tide with Carter at this point and Ford lost. history is deffinitly on Kerry's side.
|
Doosh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-28-04 11:41 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. wow, Carter led Reagan 47-39 as late as October 9 |
|
damn it Jimmy, why couldn't you hang on!?!?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Feb 14th 2026, 03:05 PM
Response to Original message |