Associated Press To The Rescue! Palin Was Thoroughly Vetted, After All!

[Hope And Change]

Associated Press To The Rescue! Palin Was Thoroughly Vetted, After All!

By Greg Sargent - September 2, 2008, 11:04AM


Read more here:

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/09/associated_press_to_the_rescue.php#comments

[blm]

1. Finally the left media is squawking about AP, Fournier and Pickler. It took em long enough

to notice when many of us saw the GOP spinteam in action back in 2000 and 2004. Push back on the mediawhores like AP from other media sources is EXACTLY what has been missing in previous years.

[book_worm]

2. Oh really? that's why each of these things are coming out now.

[Median Democrat]

3. Red Light! Green Light! Get their story straight!

[DaHoot]

4. While I don't believe that

I find the thought that they knew all of this and still picked her to be even worse.

[endthewar]

5. Makes it sound even worse for McCain

If he knew all of this and still chose her.

[Proud Liberal Dem]

6. It looks BAD for McSame EITHER WAY IMHO

If he didn't vet her properly then that suggests that McSame is reckless and is able/willing to make a momentous decision on the basis of selective and/or minimal information. Would we want ANOTHER President who does this deciding where, when, and how to deploy our military for instance?
If he DID vet her properly then that suggests that, like Obama said about McCain, "he doesn't get it" and I would challenge any other past Presidential candidates to make a compelling argument for McSame's judgment in light of his selection of Palin, especially since she is currently under investigation for corruption (you can tell she's ready-she's ALREADY under investigation and she hasn't even been elected VP yet).