NOW Faux News is covering the protest.

[bbernardini]

Figures.

[cal04]

1. they probably sent someone out

to set the fire so that's what they could start their coverage with

[lapfog_1]

2. I refuse to watch

but I'm sure that "this sickens me" or "a sickening sight" or
other similar language will be trotted out shortly.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

6. "A Fire Was Started By Violent Leftist Radicals."

How's that for their headline? Betcha anything some Fox staffer started it because the demonstration was boringly peaceful, consisting mainly of ordinary-looking people who don't have green hair and strange piercings, and they couldn't every well show that. Especially when they were chanting "FOX NEWS SUCKS!"

[Leilani]

3. They covered the fire

I was watching C-Span, but flipped over...I knew they would do that.

[TheWebHead]

4. at least their report said

it's been largely peaceful and didn't try to downsize the 250k protester figure... But yeah it was funny seeing the "faux News Alert" for the fire

[Leilani]

5. They said there were 10s of thousands

not 250,000, as expected.

[TheWebHead]

7. the chiron said 10s of Ks

but the woman reporter in MSG said 250k.. I saw a republican on MSRNC try to downplay the # because they put a camera where there weren't many people earlier today.

[GingerSnaps]

8. A few people were shouting Faux started the fire

They sounded serious and I hope that someone got pictures.

The Dragon was elaborate and I don't know how someone could have gotten something like that past the police unless it was Faux.

[Lefty48197]

9. FAUX just showed people getting arrested

I've been watching the march for over 3 hours, and I didn't see one single arrest. Fox must have looked long and hard for that shot.