dennis4868
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-30-04 09:41 PM
Original message |
|
Maybe I am stupid and naive, but why is there no longer a discussion/debate over Bush lieing to the american people and the world regarding the immediate threat of Saddam before the war?
Is it just assumed by the mainstreem media now that Bush did not lie and was simply given bad intelligence?
Of course we all know there is an incredible amount of facts/evidence that clearly shows that Bush, Cheney and the rest of the thugs (not the CIA) flat out lied to us about chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, as well as the Saddam/911/al Qaeda connection.
I have not heard a substantive argument made regarding this matter by any democrat....they skip over this issue....and now they only discuss how Bush did not have a plan to win the peace.
Why are Bush's lies no longer discussed and debated? Is it because Kerry voted for authorization? What is it?
|
shraby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-30-04 09:50 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. It all went down the memory hole. |
|
This administration is so convoluted that it has become like the famous maze in England. We'll be lucky if we ever find our way around and out.
|
dennis4868
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-30-04 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
almost 1000 soldiers are now dead for Bush's lies AND THE FUCKING MEDIA DOES NOT HOLD BUSH ACCOUNTABLE FOR IT!
|
dennis4868
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-30-04 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
even down the memory hole of dems.....time after time, dems on TV never attack Bush regarding his lies before the Iraq war...they give him a pass......why? What are they scared of? There is plenty of evidence that Bush lied and exxagerated the threat, and not the CIA!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 12th 2026, 01:54 PM
Response to Original message |