White House says book is filled with "same trash discredited years ago."

[kentuck]

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/tm_objectid=14609301&method=full&siteid=50143&headline=bush--took-cocaine-at-camp-david--name_page.html

<snip>
His supporters have slammed the allegations as outrageous.

The White House said: "This book appears to be filled with the same trash discredited years ago."

[Catfight]

1. I believe he's referring to "same trash" as a term used for the Bush's??

[nightperson]

14. Who to believe?

}( ! Book says White House filled with same trash discredited years ago!

[MrBenchley]

34. Let's see him pee in a cup like a Wal-Mart cashier....

Easiest way to settle it....

[acmavm]

2. And who says it was ever discredited? bush*? That's not good enough.

.

[wurzel]

3. That White House response is "the same trash discredited years ago"!

How often do they think they can go to that well!

[annxburns]

4. Sadly, America has not heard this trash ...

because of our ass kissin media.

Discredited huh? We'll see, but let's hear it first huh?

[oasis]

5. This will be a swiftboat full of bad news for the Bushista regime.

:bounce:

[MallRat]

6. Like how the AWOL allegations have been... dis... credit... ed...

... oh.

-MR

[A_Possum]

7. Awwwww...let's hear it again anyway

[Lex]

8. Maybe they should categorically deny it, or tell us HOW it was discredited

one or the other

[glitch]

17. This is what I'd like to see

saying it don't make it so - whoever has their 'truth' backed up with eye witnesses and documented facts, wins.

[Jade Fox]

9. If much of the info is indeed from Sharon Bush it is new trash....

mixed in with the old, which was not so much discredited as it was supressed.

There is actually a difference. Bushco, take note.

[tedoll78]

10. This is BIG..

And here's why: they consider the book as threatening enough to acknowledge its existence - and then respond to it.

[Lex]

11. They have to tell us HOW IT WAS DISCREDITED!

The White House saying it WAS discredited isn't going to get it.

[Maeve]

24. Agreed--if it WAS discredited, should be easy to show how

Trot it out, boyos...show us what you've got!

[luaneryder]

12. Before it's even been released.

[Dr Fate]

15. Ignoring F/9-11 did not work. So now they will attack this...

...thus promoting it.

It's hard to win against mud-slinging, even harder when it is true.

[Bluebear]

16. BINGO BOINGO BINGO tedoll!

[Dr Fate]

13. Let's hear Bush deny it in his own words. In an interview or press conf.

n/t

[cindyw]

18. Kerry is refighting an argument he had with O'Neil 33 years ago about

whether there were atrocities committed in Vietnam. I think Kerry won that argument last time. If Kerry has to re-fight Vietnam because he made it the centerpiece of his campaign, then it is only fair that Bush should have to answer to these charges when he is the God president and anti-choice guy.

[in_cog_ni_to]

19. Some people's trash is other people's gold mines.

This is a gold mine. I can't wait to read it.

Remember, the Clinton affairs...they mattered to the repukes. Remember, the Clinton "I didn't inhale" mattered to the repukes. Remember, the Clinton BJ mattered to the repukes.

IT MATTERS! THIS TRASH MATTERS!

[wryter2000]

20. hahahaha

As ye sow, so shall ye reap, moran.

[kentuck]

21. If it's coming from Sharon Bush...?

Won't it be seen as more credible - since she was so close to the family??

[underpants]

22. Wait for the "disgruntled spurned ex-wife" line

who by the way caught the clap from her husband who DID NOT know those three women showing up at his hotel room at 10PM while on a business trip in ever feminist-considerate Hong Kong so it made it okay to sleep with them.

Got it?

[kentuck]

23. But...is it true ?????

:shrug:

[underpants]

27. Hold it a second....Wolf is getting the truth in his earpiece

:bounce:

[RevCheesehead]

25. Shouldn't Kerry Respond:

I think they should ban all those books about the President

[Doosh]

26. you see how quickly they fire back

this is howe we should've hit back at the swift boat liars.

[kentuck]

29. Good point...

But the SBVT ads were undocumented and in total contradiction to everything, even the US Navy. It's amazing that the media decided to make it such a big issue - with no credibility.

[City Lights]

30. They're firing back quickly, but they're firing back

against stuff that hasn't even been released yet. The book is not due out for another week. Trying to throw a blanket denial over "everything" in the book makes them look desperate to me.

[AP]

28. Similar to their argument about F911: "old news"...

...as if somehow being old means it's not true.

I'll grant them that they say it was discredited years ago, but the point should not be that it's old but that it isn't true. They should be reminding us of the evidence that it isn't true.

[RevCheesehead]

31. LOVE the picture!!!

[diamond14]

32. Millions more will want that book, since THE WHITE HOUSE said

it is trash.....and I guess THE WHITE HOUSE never learned anything from their criticism of Michael Moore's movie....having the White House condemn it, before it's release, makes many many Americans curious....you can't get any better pre-publishing publicity than a condemnation from THE WHITE HOUSE.....


and EVERYBODY has been waiting waiting to hear the INSIDE scoop on Sharon bush* divorce from the pResident's brother, neil....being married to the pResident's brother for 27 years, certainly Sharon has some stories to tell....

if those bushies had any brains, they would have given a GIGANTIC settlement to Sharon (out of there HUGE gobs of blood money)...and then they wouldn't have all these problems....did you ever hear anything from the mistress of Nelson Rockefeller, after Nelson died while having sex with her....NO...money will do that for you...bush* has the money, but not the brains...

[MrBenchley]

33. When was it ever brought up before?

I sure don't remember anyone mentioning this four years ago? Do you?

[underpants]

36. About as often as his TANG record was brought up

which is not very often.

[Lex]

35. Bush and Rove should say HOW it was discredited before.

WHEN was it discredited before?

HOW was it discredited before?

Refresh us, Bush and Rove. Otherwise, I think you are just telling me goobledegook.

[underpants]

38. "same trash discredited years ago."--the story or W?

He was discredited YEARS ago. In that family he was their trash.

[diamond14]

39. LOL.....I can't stop laughing...that line says it all.....

thanks...


I think THE WHITE HOUSE was actually referring to bush*, and not the story....sometimes I wonder how those people can keep covering for bush* and still consider themselves Americans.......how can they close their eyes at night with the screams of OUR DEAD soldiers and thousands of DEAD Iraqis....it has to haunt them....

[imax2268]

37. "White House says book is filled with "same trash discredited years ago.""

Oh really...wow...but the SBVT book is the truth...?

I can see another character assassination coming on...

[aint_no_life_nowhere]

40. Lie Detector Tests At 20 Paces For Sharon Bush And George

Sharon Bush should challenge George Bush to a duel of lie detector tests if they try to trash her over this.