|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
| henslee
|
Wed Sep-08-04 05:56 AM Original message |
| Can the lying, alcoholic cokehead, deserter really call off a debate with |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| clydefrand
|
Wed Sep-08-04 06:02 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. What reason did he give for calling off a debate? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cthrumatrix
|
Wed Sep-08-04 06:07 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. something about objective voters asking the questions - not reporters |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cthrumatrix
|
Wed Sep-08-04 02:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 31. seems the voters NEED to understand what a coward he is |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jack from Charlotte
|
Wed Sep-08-04 03:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 38. George Bush: AWOL in '72. AWOL on 9/11. Awol in '04 debate. (nfm) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FloridaPat
|
Wed Sep-08-04 06:05 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. It was the debate with the uncommited voters. Probably didn't |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Stephanie
|
Wed Sep-08-04 07:44 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 17. The Coward from Crawford |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DeepModem Mom
|
Wed Sep-08-04 06:06 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. Bush can seemingly do anything with impunity... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Spinzonner
|
Wed Sep-08-04 06:08 AM Response to Original message |
| 5. I don't think this will carry far |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mike Daniels
|
Wed Sep-08-04 08:22 AM Response to Reply #5 |
| 21. And Clinton's excuse was equally lame - |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| demokatgurrl
|
Wed Sep-08-04 03:01 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 35. But as I remind my Republican friends... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ganja Ninja
|
Wed Sep-08-04 06:10 AM Response to Original message |
| 6. He can get away with murder .... and has! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cthrumatrix
|
Wed Sep-08-04 02:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 32. you have that right |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bowens43
|
Wed Sep-08-04 06:11 AM Response to Original message |
| 7. yes, he can. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| smada
|
Wed Sep-08-04 06:13 AM Response to Original message |
| 8. don't get ugly |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Walt Starr
|
Wed Sep-08-04 06:19 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 10. Fuck that, GET DOWNRIGHT NASTY |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| henslee
|
Wed Sep-08-04 06:41 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 11. My terminology may be crude but now these are all substantiated |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bernardo de La Paz
|
Wed Sep-08-04 07:05 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 12. Don't hafta get ugly, just real. Bush is scared and petrified with real Qs |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BlueEyedSon
|
Wed Sep-08-04 07:22 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 13. If he is impaired as a result of his longstanding substance abuse |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Malva Zebrina
|
Wed Sep-08-04 07:31 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 15. Alcoholics freely admit to being alcoholics if they attend AA meetings |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| smada
|
Wed Sep-08-04 08:55 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 23. What rumors from what sources? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Malva Zebrina
|
Wed Sep-08-04 01:56 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 25. I explained to you the concept of dry drunk |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Connie_Corleone
|
Wed Sep-08-04 07:35 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 16. Bush never got help for his alcoholism. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| henslee
|
Wed Sep-08-04 02:25 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 27. He sure looks hungover in this recent pic. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Stephanie
|
Wed Sep-08-04 07:47 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 18. Please see the Kitty Kelley threads re: coke use |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Atman
|
Wed Sep-08-04 08:06 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 20. Oh, puhleeze! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| smada
|
Wed Sep-08-04 09:06 AM Response to Reply #20 |
| 24. I agree about AA |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Malva Zebrina
|
Wed Sep-08-04 02:05 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 26. AA is not a cult--many have used the program successfully |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| IdaBriggs
|
Wed Sep-08-04 03:18 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 40. He had a SERIOUS point -- |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ComerPerro
|
Wed Sep-08-04 02:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 29. Sorry, but he is an alcoholic. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hippiegranny
|
Wed Sep-08-04 02:31 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 30. at the risk of sounding petty |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jim Sagle
|
Wed Sep-08-04 02:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 34. You're the one that's going to be dismissed. Buh-bye! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AndyTiedye
|
Wed Sep-08-04 06:15 AM Response to Original message |
| 9. There Will Be No Debates |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| in_cog_ni_to
|
Wed Sep-08-04 07:25 AM Response to Original message |
| 14. Of course. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bushwakker
|
Wed Sep-08-04 07:48 AM Response to Original message |
| 19. The GOP drags it's heels on debates every 4 years |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cthrumatrix
|
Wed Sep-08-04 08:30 AM Response to Reply #19 |
| 22. especially with the AWOL and cola news |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cheshire
|
Wed Sep-08-04 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 28. Faux's spin, 2 debates didn't hurt Clinton or Reagan. No big deal |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| demokatgurrl
|
Wed Sep-08-04 03:02 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 36. The big deal is |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BillZBubb
|
Wed Sep-08-04 03:39 PM Response to Reply #36 |
| 42. This is the exact, correct strategy. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| THUNDER HANDS
|
Wed Sep-08-04 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. he can duck a debate, Clinton did |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| demokatgurrl
|
Wed Sep-08-04 03:03 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 37. Clinton's not running |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| napi21
|
Wed Sep-08-04 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 39. I checked the debate history. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rockholm
|
Wed Sep-08-04 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
| 41. Personally, I would like to see a debate a week. (nft) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 19th 2026, 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC