Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-09-04 03:43 PM
Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
grannylib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-09-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Well-said! What's the whole story about a 'changed transcript?' |
|
What kind of filth are those bastards up to now?
|
Qutzupalotl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-09-04 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. The WH transcript has an asterisk |
|
explaining that Bush met with superior officers to try to comply with the order.
|
skygazer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-09-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-09-04 03:52 PM by skygazer
Or proof to back that up, it is merely his word and meaningless as far as I'm concerned. That's one thing that bugged me on the show last night is they didn't follow up when the talking head said that. They needed to ask, "well, does he have record of that?"
Shit, if that's all you need, anyone could go to court and say, well yeah, I asked so and so and he said it was fine. Of course, so and so is dead now........
|
Lefty48197
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-09-04 03:49 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. I'm sorry. We need somebody to clarify the latest clarification |
|
about Bush's "missing" records, about this statement that we CAN'T win the war on terrorism, about... Keep the clarifications coming please. It's the only way we'll know what Bush MEANT to say.
|
michigandem2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-09-04 03:51 PM
Response to Original message |
|
See this is great...someone giving them a big kick in the ASS!!!
|
Lex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-09-04 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 7. That's what I'm talking about!! |
mumon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-09-04 03:57 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. HOW COME McClellan's doing this on OUR dime? |
|
Is he working for us or for the Bush election campaign?
|
Myrina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-09-04 04:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. Not to nitpick but ... |
|
"Making matters worse, Mr. McClellan’s own words defending the president were doctored by an unseen hand within the government to help clarify the administration’s position on the questions about George Bush’s veracity."
I had to read that sentence about 4 times before it made sense. Whole lotta action going on between punctuations.
|
cally
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-09-04 04:05 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. Kerry now has the A team |
|
on his side. Lockhart is one of the best. :bounce:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Feb 10th 2026, 01:00 PM
Response to Original message |