|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
| Bicoastal
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:40 PM Original message |
| I've been scratching my head: what would anyone have against Tom Daschle? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| IndianaJones
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. something new to whine about. nt. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| babylonsister
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. His wife is/was a lobbyist, so we need to get that out of the way. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sufrommich
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. You last sentence says it all. Daschle is a great pick. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mass
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. No problem with Daschle. Just remember some would have preferred somebody else. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| librechik
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. I don't know--but somebody sent him anthrax |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NashVegas
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. Daschle Is Perceived as a Pink Tutu Dem |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sufrommich
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 10. What the heck is a "pink tutu Dem"?? nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NashVegas
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 12. ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Starry Messenger
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 28. 246 results and the top three are DU posts!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| blm
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:06 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 33. Yes, because of his IWR position, one he was advised to take by Bill Clinton who urged |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NashVegas
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:30 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 47. I Was Thinking More Along the Lines of Ineffective Leadership |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ishoutandscream2
|
Wed Nov-19-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #47 |
| 51. Excellent answer. Perfect. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| blm
|
Wed Nov-19-08 04:28 PM Response to Reply #47 |
| 56. Media climate AND the fact that Clinton urged DC Dems to give Bush all the backup needed post 9-11 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jobycom
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. He was blasted here for not single-handedly impeaching Bush and blocking all his efforts. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nicholas D Wolfwood
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 41. Wish I could k&r a post... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| GodlessBiker
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. I don't see a great chorus of boo's. Some people will always prefer someone else. That's allowed. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tularetom
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. "very few lobbyist ties"- How 'bout being married to a lobbyist? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Democrats_win
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:51 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 18. Is it wrong to feel good about this appointment? It's like an FU to the GOP. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Atman
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. He was one of the first to go spineless after the antrhax blackmail...er, attack |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bicoastal
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 14. "After Cheney did the fake anthrax attack..." |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Atman
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 15. LOL! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RollWithIt
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 35. I worked in the offices in Florida that had Anthrax mailed to them.. AMI... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Atman
|
Wed Nov-19-08 02:26 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 49. Where did I say the Anthrax was fake? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| babylonsister
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 23. Have you ever had anthrax sent to you? I wonder how I'd respond |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jobycom
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:29 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 46. James Patterson would be impressed! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HereSince1628
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. How about lack of management experience and expertise in HHS? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 20. Hillary would be great in HHS but I guess it's not "big" enough for her. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HereSince1628
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 26. Remember when everyone said Obama would shock the left? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| babylonsister
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 25. Too bad we didn't elect you. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HereSince1628
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 27. Yes, well ad hominem attacks are for those who have nothing to say. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| babylonsister
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:02 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 29. I'm saying that I think Obama knows his credentials a bit more |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HereSince1628
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:07 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 34. Actually you're "trusting" that Obama knows more. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FrenchieCat
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:30 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 48. You are incorrect in this matter, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| blm
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:12 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 37. You're wrong - he recently wrote a book on healthcare. He has been part of Obama's rise |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HereSince1628
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:15 PM Response to Reply #37 |
| 40. Ok, he wrote a book on health care, I am corrected. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| babylonsister
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:19 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 42. See post #17-about the book. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HereSince1628
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #42 |
| 44. I did...he is a co-author among three. The author with the credentials is Jeanne Lambrew |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LisaM
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. How about letting the IWR come to a vote just before the 2002 election? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FrenchieCat
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 24. That was Gephard that did the IWR double Cross, not Daschle. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nicholas D Wolfwood
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:19 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 43. That's completely ignoring the rules of the game. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FrenchieCat
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:27 PM Response to Reply #43 |
| 45. That's not my understanding......on what happened. The White House went through Gephardt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MarjorieG
|
Wed Nov-19-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 57. Gephardt and Lieberman, again. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FrenchieCat
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. I've always liked Tom Daschle, although I think that he will be more |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Alcibiades
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. God forbid we have someone in that job |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Wetzelbill
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 21. Daschle could be a little wishy-washy |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tigereye
|
Wed Nov-19-08 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 22. I've always liked Daschle - I was bummed when he got the boot before... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| OKNancy
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. He's not Noam Chomsky? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RollWithIt
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 32. BINGO!!! DING DING DING!!! WE HAVE A WINNER!!!!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| phleshdef
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 31. Its the difference between reasonable Democratic supporters and ideological purists who think their |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| spanone
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 36. whine and cheese |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DesertFlower
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 38. i'm not complaining. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BumRushDaShow
|
Wed Nov-19-08 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 39. Compared to the "undertakers" like Mitchell and Reid |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SIMPLYB1980
|
Wed Nov-19-08 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 50. I'm outraged by this decision!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FrenchieCat
|
Wed Nov-19-08 03:30 PM Response to Reply #50 |
| 52. You know the drill! :) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| iamthebandfanman
|
Wed Nov-19-08 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
| 53. Al Gore got an awakening in 2000 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| obreaslan
|
Wed Nov-19-08 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 54. TOM DASCHLE TOOK MY SHOE!!!!!!!!1!11!!!!1!!!111 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Dr Fate
|
Wed Nov-19-08 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
| 55. I thought he was the definition of a wuss as to opposing Bush- but I trust Obama's judgement. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Feb 06th 2026, 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC