Dem Agog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-04 11:19 AM
Original message |
|
This guy is saying it's "unethical" for Doubleday to publish the book, for Kitty Kelley to write the book and for people to buy the book.
God forbid anyone criticize the President!
F'ing moron.
|
skygazer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-04 11:20 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Yes, and I'm sure he said the same |
|
about the Swiftie's book. Wink, wink. Disgusting.
|
krkaufman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-04 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 7. Who knows? I'm sure he wasn't brought in to question their right... |
|
... to publish.
If having a journalistic standard is a good thing, having multiple standards is a great thing.
|
lancdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-04 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 11. And where was he when all those RW books trashed Clinton? |
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-04 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
Proud2BAmurkin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-04 11:20 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. My ethicist said it's unethical not to buy and read the book |
Dem Agog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Even if it's all true he says it's STILL unethical because he says Kitty Kelley did not do her "due diligence" before publishing the book. (This is bullshit - she DID.)
He then painted CBS with the same stroke - saying they are unethical because they didn't do their "due diligence" before last week's story. The memos aren't forgeries!
What a moron!
At least the woman interviewing him had the (vague) decency to remind us at the end, "The point of view of (fucking morong), ethicist" before ending the interview.
|
grasswire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. where were the ethicists... |
|
....during the hunting of the Clintons?
Hmmmmm?
|
JHB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
liberal N proud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message |
| 4. They could get her with the ADA act. |
|
She is abusing a mentally handicap government employee. (shrub)
|
AmerDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-04 11:22 AM
Response to Original message |
|
live in a free society. This is at a point of pure evil now. I mean, are these creeps already drawing plans for new concentration camps? FUCK!
|
umtalal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-04 11:26 AM
Response to Original message |
| 8. But if it was on Bill Clinton then buy it. n/t |
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-04 11:27 AM
Response to Original message |
| 9. boy the glaring difference embracing of swift boat |
|
with a documented military record, with kelly and bush. knowing what she says is to, at least the core.
|
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-04 11:35 AM
Response to Original message |
| 12. MSNBC says its unethical for Swift vets to accuse Kerry with NO documents |
|
to back up their accusations.
Oops...no they didn't. Instead they gave the Swift vets a platform to spew their undocumented charges 24/7 for a month.
|
Carni
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-04 12:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 14. I just watched that POS |
|
Did anyone catch his name?
|
UTUSN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-04 12:17 PM
Response to Original message |
| 15. E-mail at ombudsman@msnbc.com |
|
and (201)583-4385, will only connect you to a message recording line.
I saw that jerk. He kept saying it was all "gossip". As I've (over-)posted, the dictionary definition contains NO connotation of "untruth". Quite the contrary, it sez "reports" of "facts" regarding intimate or sensational things. It don't say nuttin about NOT being true.
|
Cocoa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-04 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |
| 16. MSNBC has an ethicist? |
|
Did he comment on MSNBC's own Joe Scarborough, who invited his law partner on his program, to discuss a legal case, without disclosing his guest's relationship to him, and without disclosing that their firm was a party in the case being discussed?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Mar 21st 2026, 07:08 PM
Response to Original message |