Mrs. Overall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:46 PM
Original message |
| MSNBC--Obama retook the oath today because of yesterday's blunder. |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-21-09 08:16 PM by Mrs. Overall
Coolidge and Arthur took the oath twice as well.
|
ronnykmarshall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:48 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Hopefully that will shut the freepers traps. |
kayakjohnny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:48 PM
Response to Original message |
|
A first? Maybe not. But weird anyway, I believe. Oh well. He's in and that's all that matters.
|
BootinUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:49 PM
Response to Original message |
Mrs. Overall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. David Shuster reported it just a few minutes ago, but they are now busy talking about Caroline |
|
Kennedy withdrawing. I haven't heard any other details.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. Thanks..this is actually |
|
good news to me because of the whole timing thing I get into.
|
Merlot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 14. How does this affect things from a timing perspective? |
|
I'll be the astrologers are having a field day with this one!
|
MorningGlow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
We're in the middle of Mercury retrograde, which wreaks havoc with communication--even the oath of office, apparently. But Merc ret is also good for do-overs. :hi:
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
| 20. Yesterday was a VOC until 12:30pm, too and |
|
I think it's a miracle that Roberts' helped us to have Obama take it over today!
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
| 21. Yes they are! And, the timing of the Swearing |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-21-09 08:37 PM by zidzi
In yesterday wasn't optimal for new beginnings..it's complicated but suffice to say that today is much better and I think Robert's helped us out!
How freakin' Cosmically Ironic is that!
|
Merlot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
| 25. Not ironic at all...the stars are looking out for Obama |
|
Glad to hear today is much better.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
|
have Roberts as helper is really sweet:)
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
| 27. I found this interesting descriptive article of the latest Swear In.. |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-21-09 08:54 PM by zidzi
<snips> "WASHINGTON — Chief Justice John G. Roberts was ushered into the Map Room of the White House on Wednesday night to re-administer the oath of office to President Barack Obama because the original oath on Tuesday had a word out of sequence.
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said the move was made out of "an abundance of caution" in consultation with White House Counsel Greg Craig. Obama's second swearing-in, devoid of the pomp of the initial event, took place at 7:35 p.m. in the presence of a few aides and a press pool. The chief justice was wearing a court robe. "Are you ready to take the oath?" Roberts said. "I am," Obama said, "And we're going to do it very slowly."
It capped a packed first full day for the 44th president, and comes on the heels of Obama's expected signing of an executive order, as soon as Thursday, shuttering the terrorism detention facility at Guantanamo Bay.
Obama began the day by attending a prayer service at the Washington National Cathedral, a tradition for new presidents.
He also celebrated a political victory as his former presidential primary rival, Hillary Clinton, was confirmed by the Senate as secretary of state, with a vote of 94-2."<more> http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/60448.html
|
That Is Quite Enough
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:49 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. At least it's one less thing the birthers can't make a conspiracy theory out of. |
SuperTrouper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 13. They are now busy with CKS to Mass to take over Teddy's seat |
onefreespiritedchick
(846 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
The freepers and their conspiracy theories might even be funny if they weren't such pathetic morons. :crazy:
|
nickw
(53 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 29. Isn't this the sort of thing that has happened before? |
|
You'd think there might be an expert who could just tell us who's right on this. I watched the inauguration in a bar on both CNN and CBS - one said that after Biden took the oath that he was temporarily president, and the other said that Obama became president at noon whether he took the oath or not.
|
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:51 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. That will be on a Jeopardy question someday |
sohndrsmith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:53 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. on which show? You must be on the east coast because that |
|
hasn't been aired on the west - I've had them on all day. I do recall reading that experts said this was a reasonable thing to do if the story didn't go away.
From what I can tell, there is nothing in the Constitution that says the oath is invalid if it includes any verbal gaffes or missteps in any way, or textually different from the oath as written.
First of all, anyone taking the oath includes his or her name, and "So help me God" is not part of what's written in the Constitution, but it's usually included.
And the words (or affirm) are in parentheses, as an option to "swear" (I'm guessing).
So I don't think anyone can - legally and accurately take the oath of Presidency by using the words and only the words as written in the Constitution. No one could include their name, no one could mispronounce or choose "swear over affirm" or say so help me God".
This is so goofy to me... but if he did take the oath again, I'm glad so that the story just goes away.
|
Mrs. Overall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 12. Nope--WA State here. During MSNBC talking about Caroline, David Shuster |
|
broke in and said that Obama retook the oath. He sort of laughed about it and then went on talking about Caroline.
|
Lord Helmet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:53 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. my polysci professor said he should so if its' true I'm glad |
jillan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 07:54 PM
Response to Original message |
| 11. Wonder who swore him in? |
Lorien
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 28. Chief Justice McFlub. nt |
Mrs. Overall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 15. Yep--Keith just reported it, too. |
uppityperson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:05 PM
Response to Original message |
| 17. here is a link to the story... |
Mrs. Overall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
uppityperson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:10 PM
Original message |
| you are welcome and you have a new name! |
|
At least I'll have a month to get used to the new names. If I forget later and act stupider than usual, remind me who you were, ok?
|
Mrs. Overall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:23 PM
Response to Original message |
nichomachus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:10 PM
Response to Original message |
|
the wingnuts will claim that any actions he took between yesterday noon and tonight were illegal and that he has to do them all over again.
There's no pleasing these nuts.
|
Cali_Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-21-09 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 23rd 2026, 05:49 PM
Response to Original message |