|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
timzi
![]() |
Mon Oct-26-09 11:23 PM Original message |
The Public Option Sham |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpartanDem
![]() |
Mon Oct-26-09 11:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. That's only the Senate version |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Mon Oct-26-09 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
2. Unless it gets changed a lot......It absolutely SUCKS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garam_Masala
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 01:00 AM Response to Reply #2 |
14. Why must our politicians always prostitute themselves to the insurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
global1
![]() |
Mon Oct-26-09 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. Help Me Here - There Is Still Going To Be A House Bill - Right? - And Nancy Pelosi....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill
![]() |
Mon Oct-26-09 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. They're just bringing it to the floor. There will be several amendments added. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Mon Oct-26-09 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
5. Maybe President Obama wants a new half-of-a-Congress in 2010. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LooseWilly
![]() |
Mon Oct-26-09 11:52 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Ahh, right. A mere 60 seat (well 58 + 2) Super Majority isn't enough... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 08:03 AM Response to Reply #13 |
29. "you" = me? Hey, I was responding to the OP who was saying that about O. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apnu
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 08:47 AM Response to Reply #13 |
31. Well it sure isn't enough for Reid... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garam_Masala
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 01:05 AM Response to Reply #5 |
17. Nope...Rahm hand picked the Dem candidates in 2008 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 04:02 AM Response to Reply #17 |
22. And taxing the hign ended (better per the Unions) seems to in the plan also... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Mon Oct-26-09 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
6. You're right. We shouldn't have passed any reform without any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Mon Oct-26-09 11:43 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 03:51 AM Response to Reply #6 |
21. ah, name-callling with nothing else to add. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 07:04 AM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Hell, I'll do that for free. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 07:31 AM Response to Reply #21 |
27. If the glove fits. The Party of No includes leftwing DU'ers too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer
![]() |
Mon Oct-26-09 11:41 PM Response to Original message |
7. What you describe is pretty much what I have come to expect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Mon Oct-26-09 11:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. it's what I aways expected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Mon Oct-26-09 11:44 PM Response to Original message |
10. This is stupid. The opt out has nothing to do with how robust a public option will be. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timzi
![]() |
Mon Oct-26-09 11:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Most Would Have No Public Option...Got Nothing To Do With "Robust".NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarjorieG
![]() |
Mon Oct-26-09 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
11. Industry had claws in/arrangements before we got Obama. With opt-out should be easier to tear down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
15. Wyden's Free Choice Admendment would vastly improve the PO and open it up to everyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 01:04 AM Response to Original message |
16. Hidden Profile? Check. Mr Obama (sic) can kiss my ass? Check. Screwn in 2010? Check. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 03:03 AM Response to Original message |
18. She's left out a couple of things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola
![]() |
Wed Oct-28-09 08:45 AM Response to Reply #18 |
46. I think Obama said it will only include less than 5% of folks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 03:16 AM Response to Original message |
19. Complaining and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 03:42 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. The OP included some substance: You just whined and griped. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BklnDem75
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 06:38 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Um... that's what the OP did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 07:32 AM Response to Reply #20 |
28. The OP served up a heaping helping of concern. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 12:09 PM Response to Reply #19 |
36. They said for months there would be no public option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 04:46 AM Response to Original message |
23. Democrats Should Dump 'Public Option"..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timzi
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 08:43 AM Response to Reply #23 |
30. I Agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 11:48 AM Response to Reply #30 |
35. Labeling is a tactic to belittle the OP and add nothing to the discussion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 07:03 AM Response to Original message |
25. SO BORING |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timzi
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 08:57 AM Response to Reply #25 |
32. No, I dont.....(n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
33. Nobody ever knew what it was anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
34. There is no bill. There is no bill. There is no bill. There is no bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 01:36 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. Is that why we must guess what kind of "public option" is in Reid's bill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 02:26 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. It'll be what it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
37. FYI-No one in GD-P wants to hear the truth you post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 12:14 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. There are some like me who listen but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timzi
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 12:52 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Of Course They Will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 03:30 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. you are right, some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 03:34 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. the unrecs are DU's version of the tea baggers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 03:38 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Tue Oct-27-09 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
45. The greedy insurance lobby wants 100%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu
![]() |
Wed Oct-28-09 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
47. Enjoy your stay!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8
![]() |
Wed Oct-28-09 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
48. Your other choice is the Baucus plan....which has no public option. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yavin4
![]() |
Wed Oct-28-09 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
49. Let's Look at What Rachel Said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
andym
![]() |
Wed Oct-28-09 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
50. It may be a "sham," but it won't be easy to even get this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC