Poiuyt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-04 07:52 PM
Original message |
| Has anybody seen the quicksand ad? |
|
References to Iraq as a man is sinking into quicksand? I just heard Paula Zahn refer to it as "hideous." It must be REALLY good!
|
Dying Eagle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-04 07:53 PM
Response to Original message |
LTR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-04 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-17-04 07:58 PM by RatTerrier
http://www.moveonpac.org/My take? It's brash, but I don't see what the fuss is all about.
|
Mayberry Machiavelli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-04 07:58 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. What, was she criticizing moveon.org for the ad's content? Or just saying |
Poiuyt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-04 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. I think she was saying that the ad's content was too inflammatory |
|
I just watched it and thought it was damn good! It certainly wasn't more inflammatory than the famous anti-Goldwater/little girl ad.
|
codegreen
(827 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-04 08:02 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. well, it is sorta cheesy, should mention 'bring em on', along with |
|
pay disparity between troops and contractors and lack of a plan for after getting to Bagdhad.
it could have mentioned all that if spoken right; i'm tired of ads not being more hyper-informative.
|
NV Whino
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-04 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 6. Ads are not meant to be informative. |
|
They are meant to play on your emotions.
And anything that gets the GOP's dander up is okay in my book.
P.S. How anyone could interpret that as a soldier surrendering is beyond me.
|
troubleinwinter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-04 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
It gets one's attention and is illustrative of the point.
|
codegreen
(827 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-04 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 9. good, yes. i guess i'm looking for really great. |
codegreen
(827 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-04 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. well, i still believe ads should be more informative, quality seconds |
|
while simultaneously playing on emotions, perhaps. after all, that's what facts do when the facts are as horrible as they are about all of this.
as for interpretting a surrender, i believe that in the final frame, the way he is holding the gun, esp. without a finger near the trigger, could be percieved as indicating that. not that i think that is intentional, or that i personally see that or agree with that assessment, but i can understand someone seeing it.
|
Leilani
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-04 09:00 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. I think they call it the Quagmire Ad |
|
& I don t like it at all...the first time I saw it, it bothered me.
And then, I heard some criticism of it, so I wasn t crazy.
I don t think the troops should be used that way; things are bad enough for them, without using them like that.
And politically, I don t think it is real smart...it will turn off Indies, moderate Repubs, & some undecideds.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 26th 2026, 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |