PlanetBev
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-04 09:14 PM
Original message |
| What did the Clinton's polling show at this time in 1992? |
|
These polls are very demoralizing, they just don't make sense. Chimpy is looking worse and worse everyday, and they keep fixing his polls numbers higher.
I know they showed Gore behind 13 points behind Bush 10 days before election day, but I am curious about where Clinton's pollls were in September.
|
gmoney
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-04 09:17 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. I think he was down, but what do I know? |
|
Hell, I barely remember Arsenio Hall (or Arsenio Beckman for that matter)
|
Meshuga
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-04 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. UP. He took off after the DNC. |
|
But Gore was down and won the popular in 2000.
|
liberalpragmatist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Clinton Stayed Ahead After the Convention |
|
He was well-behind before, then got a huge and sustained *bounce* that carried him into November.
A better analogy for this race is Reagan-Carter 1980 - neck and neck with a shifting lead back-and-forth over the last few months. Few expected it would be decisive. But Reagan surged ahead on the final weekend and won in a landslide.
I'm not saying this year will be a landslide - it might be, it might not be - the point is that the final outcome is often a surprise. 2 months is a LONG time in politics.
|
shockingelk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-04 09:21 PM
Response to Original message |
LisaL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-04 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Clinton won by a landslide. But what was going in 1992?
|
shockingelk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-04 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Clinton: 43.01% Bush: 37.45% Perot: 18.91%
The dynamic there was that Bush, GHW was unpopular, even within his own party.
I'm not sure if there's a comparable election.
|
shockingelk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-04 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 7. & actual results, 1996 |
|
Clinton 49.23% Dole 40.72% Perot: 8.40%
|
Doosh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-04 09:23 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. On October 9th Reagan trailed Carter by 9 points! |
|
on OCTOBER 9TH!!!
and look how that turned out, ugh.
|
shockingelk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-04 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 9. & in popular vote in 1996 |
|
Clinton got 8% less than where Gallup had him 9 days before election day.
Polls are good at showing trends, and I love watching them ... but they're not a reason to get excited or discouraged unless there's a huge gap and LV end up being accurate.
|
shivaji
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-04 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 10. But is there one big difference between Kerry & Reagan? |
|
which is...Reagan came across as likeable, whereas the media keeps repeating how unlikeable Kerry is.
A big percentage of sheeple vote not based on issues but on whom they like.
|
Doosh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-16-04 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
remember, reagan was thought of as some dangerous trigger happy warhawk. But he overcame that much like Kerry muct overcome the flip flopper thing.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Feb 17th 2026, 07:38 AM
Response to Original message |