Since W* is OK with a limited election for Iraq...

[LostInAnomie]

... which states should we not allow to vote in the election.

Isn't it sad that Americans are so apathetic that we don't care they they are suggesting a plan like this. We went over there to make Iraq a beacon for democracy but we are only allowing those who we want to to have a say in their own government.

What is this country's problem?

[IronLionZion]

1. Texas, Alabama, Mississippi, Utah, Indiana

to name a few. Personally I think it would be easier if all Bush-supporters were not allowed to vote on grounds of national security. Bush is just plain bad for America.

[AuntPatsy]

2. Give Texas some credit, yes they like their own but things are

not so rosy for Bush in Texas as the media would like you to believe, and in the end, what most Texans will tell themselves as they vote Kerry into office is that Bush is really not a Texan anyway, his ties being much too close to them dang Yankees, so if one must choose one of em, it might as well be someone different then the loon they have now which has been surely given our state a bad rep...

[IronLionZion]

3. OK, I wish Texas and the South would go Dem again

The Republicans win only on the social issues. Those folks tend to be social conservatives and economic liberals. Therefore, they get ass-raped by the Republicans as long they promise to discriminate against gays and restrict freedoms to protect our freedom.