:wtf:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/07/politics/campaign/07bush.html?hp"My opponent is a tax-and-spend liberal; I'm a compassionate conservative," Mr. Bush said. "My opponent wants to empower government; I want to use government to empower people. My opponent seems to think all the wisdom is found in Washington, D.C.; I trust the wisdom of the American people."
But Mr. Bush was most intense in asserting that Mr. Kerry not only shifted with the winds on national security, but also held contradictory positions that would make it impossible for him to govern. That was a message that Mr. Bush had been primed to deliver in the first debate, but never really got across, some of his advisers have said.
His message came down to one basic point: that he would do a better job than Mr. Kerry of keeping the nation safe.
"In our debate, Senator Kerry said that removing Saddam Hussein was a mistake because the threat was not imminent," Mr. Bush said. "The problem with this approach is obvious: if America waits until a threat is at our doorstep, it might be too late to save lives. Tyrants and terrorists will not give us polite notice before they launch an attack on our country. I refuse to stand by while dangers gather."