theoceansnerves
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-18-04 06:59 PM
Original message |
| we now know where the governor stands: against the people |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-18-04 07:12 PM by theoceansnerves
vetoed:
·bill that would require schools to divulge nutritional information of foods they serve ·bill to raise the minimum wage from $6.75 to $7.25, in two years to $7.75 ·bill to put the burden on wal-mart and other megastores when opening stores that would compete with union run grocery stores ·bill to change focus of forest management to preservation rather than timber profits, this bill also would have also banned old growth logging in the jackson demonstation state forest in mendocino county ·bill to require schools to inform parents of irradiated food served to kids ·bill that would recommend a task force to promote walking and cycling ·bill requiring government and school buildings built after 2007 to be more energy efficient ·bill that would basically "rat out" manufacturers not complying with plastic bag recycling rules ·bill making it harder to give random drug tests at schools
edit: spelling
|
ayeshahaqqiqa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-18-04 07:00 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Ahnold has never been for the people |
theoceansnerves
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-18-04 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
but the media and everyone else act like we (not us on du, but the population of california) didn't know where he stood on issues until these bills came up for signing.
|
atreides1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-18-04 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
It wasn't just the elite that put him into office, the people did it too. Yes, it wasn't all of the people, just the brain dead fools who actually bought his BS, but it was still enough to get him into office, and Gray Davis out.
So those that wanted him elected, are at fault for any ill effects caused by his veto of these bills, unless the legislature has the votes to overturn his vote?
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-18-04 07:00 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Now maybe they can veto him in |
gospelized
(580 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-18-04 07:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. for a second i was like |
|
what? most of those bills look awesome, what's the problem?
then i saw the "vetoed" part.
what a dick.
|
Heyo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-18-04 07:26 PM
Response to Original message |
|
.. but I would veto alot of these, too.
(flame suit on)
Not trolling, just being honest.
Heyo
|
theoceansnerves
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-18-04 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
explain which ones you would veto then?
|
mazzarro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-18-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. Which of the bills would you veto - corporate lacky? |
jrthin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-18-04 08:26 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. You see, that's the problem |
|
with the little people, they get dazzled by bullsh#t and then they get screwed. Hint to the little people: Stop being dazzled by bull manure
|
mitchtv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-18-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 10. Only the little people,pay taxes |
|
Leona Helmsley (before the fall)
|
ecoalex
(718 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-19-04 02:16 PM
Response to Original message |
|
is bushlite, all for the elite, corporations, F the people, just like shrubhole.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Feb 14th 2026, 02:17 AM
Response to Original message |