KitchenWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 02:36 AM
Original message |
| What will happen if Prop 8 passes? |
|
I mean, hundreds, if not thousands of couples already got married, will their marriages be nullified?
How do we go about retrieving the marriage right for everyone?
What is our next step?
|
Newsjock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 02:38 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Existing marriages will be defended |
|
Jerry Brown said so on KTVU-TV tonight. The rest remains to be seen.
|
AnAnonymousDemocrat
(177 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 02:48 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Can a new proposition be placed before the voters in a year or two? |
|
It's only a matter of time before the majority accepts same-sex marriage. I think that if this proposition had come along a year from now, it would have failed. Unfortunately, not enough time has passed since same-sex marriage became legal in California, and I guess the idea of it still makes a lot of people freak out.
|
JI7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. the pro 8 campaign was also very ugly and full of lies |
|
claiming people's church's would be forced to marry gay couples and other things involving kids.
|
Kajsa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 15. Their ads were ridiculous! |
|
In one ad, our State Superintendent of Schools, Jack O'Connell
was a " liberal educator".
In their next ad, he was a " liberal POLITICIAN"- WTH?!?
They made this crap us as they went along!
:grr:
We have to get 'truth in advertising' laws for campaigns and campaign ads.
It would cut out all the BS, and make it easier for voters to understand what the hell they were voting for or against.
|
proud patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 03:17 AM
Response to Original message |
| 4. I think we should organize to Tax the LDS church ! |
Mollis
(812 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
They should NOT be tax exempt. That's a load of shit.
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 7. And the catholic and the fundies |
|
they want to play... FINE... pay your damn entrance fee
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 03:40 AM
Response to Original message |
| 6. Mark my words, for many reasons this Prop, (or its florida equivalent) |
|
or perhaps both, will end up before the USSC
In the long run I think these fanatics made a mistake
The country turning blue... and if the USSC strikes this down... guess what all those state laws go out the window
Think Roe V Wade in a way
|
KitchenWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. I hope these laws get struck down. |
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 9. So do I... but this is a reminder that the battle is NEVER, EVER over |
KitchenWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
We have to continue to stand and fight.
|
Kajsa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
The battle for BASIC civil rights continues.
This- over 40 years after the birth of the Civil Rights Movement in the '60's.
:(
|
Sirveri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 11. Why would a state law go before a federal court? |
|
This is a state constitutional amendment, the USSC doesn't generally like to meddle with those unless they blatantly interfere with Federal laws/constitution. Sadly I don't see 8 going there. I still cross my fingers and hope it fails, but it's basically 2000 all over again. Thanks a bundle LDS bastards. Time to make you pay property taxes on the huge mansion in Oakland hills.
|
Proud-D
(38 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 12. I think it can go to the USSC |
|
It used to be illegal for mixed heterosexual couples to marry in many states back in the day, and those where state laws on the books. And yet eventually the USSC struck them down as unconstitutional. I think the same principle can be applied here, but it would be nice if one or two of the rightwing Justices had to step down from the bench for health reasons or something (not that I wish harm to anyone) so that President Obama can put in new ones that would vote to strike these hateful state laws down.
|
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
| 14. Yes, and like interracial marriage the issue will not be settled until the USSC rules on it |
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message |
| 13. A few modest predictions, in chronological order |
|
1. There will be some scuffles in the streets, maybe a few police cars torched;
2. Same-sex marriage proponents will take the case back to the courts. The state Supreme Court will immediately invalidate Proposition 11 because it conflicts with established parts of the constitution;
3. Opponents of same-sex marriage will initiate a recall of the SC justices who went against them.
|
Kajsa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I'm bummed- this is the biggest bummer of the entire election!
:(- you're right, what now?
I'm so glad you're feeling better.
Sorry for the late call, but Larry worked at the polling place till midnight and our newest Democrat kid took off for an election night celebration here in Costa Mesa.
I wanted to share the joy of our outstanding victory for Obama!
:) :hug:
|
KitchenWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
| 18. I was happy to talk to you! |
|
:hug:
This (equal rights) is not over by a long shot.
:hug:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Dec 14th 2025, 04:11 PM
Response to Original message |