serryjw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-18-06 08:35 PM
Original message |
| If Hickenlopper does not run...will you support Ritter? |
|
Again a lousy choice, Beauprez or Ritter?
|
rockymountaindem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-19-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. I'll support whoever the Democrats nominate in the primary |
|
Winning control of the state election machinery, as well as getting to make appointments to the state supreme court is too important, as the 2000 election debacle demonstrated.
|
MissMarple
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-22-06 04:14 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. If he's the candidate, I'm voting for him. |
|
I really don't think he is a serious menace to current abortion rights. As Roe, amended by Casey, stands this whole issue is a tempest in a teapot. The scary person is Alito, now he is a direct danger to Roe.
|
paulk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 01:17 PM
Response to Original message |
|
if we can keep control of the legislature
having a Dem. as Gov will get a lot of things through that Owens has blocked.
|
senaca
(173 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 07:10 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Beauprez vote for the Budget . |
|
Since it cuts student loans and cuts funding for medicaid could this vote come back to haunt him? I'm thinking of how this might affect all those who are in nursing homes etc. How will the state pick up these cuts?
|
otohara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-04-06 08:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
away with it! Yahooooooooooooooooo
|
serryjw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
I'm sorry, I'd love him as Governor
|
donheld
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-08-06 04:17 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. serryjw, I'd love to have a better choice |
|
but I'll vote for Ritter if that's all there is.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Dec 20th 2025, 11:55 PM
Response to Original message |