Lenape85
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-04 12:03 PM
Original message |
| Question about congressional districts |
|
Anyone find it kind of odd that several major cities in NJ are split between congressional districts. Newark is split between Payne and Menendez, Jersey City is split between Menendez and Rothman, Trenton is split between Smith and Holt, Woodbridge and Edison are split all over the place.
None of our cities are so large that they are too big for a single congressional district. What gives
|
Osamasux
(846 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-04 06:56 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. It's not just the cities |
|
Even some small towns are split (Freehold is in both the 4th and 12th, for example.) When they redrew the borders, they went strictly demographics from the computerized maps. Both sides are guilty. Their goal was seats. They didn't give a damn about how it impacted constituents.
|
Reverend_Smitty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-12-04 07:01 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. It's all about Gerrymandering |
|
But I'd say that no party has an advantage really...nothing like what the repukes did in Texas
|
mcscajun
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-04 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. Small comfort to me... |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-13-04 01:05 AM by mcscajun
...I'm in the 11th Congressional District, which for all the years I've been living in it, has a Republican Congressman. Ugh.
I've written him countless letters on issues to absolutely no effect...I get the standard Repuke answers to all of them. Never expect anything else, either.
|
Bemis
(89 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-04 07:51 AM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Yep, its the Gerrymandering |
|
Since the state legislature has usually been divided almost equally the districts are mainly geared to the incumbents. God forbid that they try to set the districts to encompass entire town and cities.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Dec 15th 2025, 11:23 PM
Response to Original message |