Two Significant Errors Found in New Jersey's Certified Election Results (December 31, 2000)
Conclusion
The frightening thing about the errors in New Jersey's election "results is that material errors were made in at least 2 of the state's 21 counties. There may be more. Hudson County had an abnormally large number of undervotes, triple the state average. And Somerset County had an abnormally high turnout.
What New Jersey shows is that the errors in Florida were not the exception, but the rule. In an age of DNA sampling, and global positioning systems that give pinpoint accuracy, is it reasonable to believe that the voting system in one of the biggest states is too imprecise to accurately tally 6.1 million voters?
Gore won the election in Florida and the nation. But George Bush is a gangster who believes in clerical errors more than he believes in democracy. His administration, a retread of Gerald Ford's, the first appointed president in United States history, is going to be a disaster. War and recession are on the horizon."
<
http://www.leinsdorf.com/newjerseyundervote.htm>
This really needs to be in election reform, forum (Feel free to open thread there) but it's real specific to NJ and the potential pitfalls we may see today.