Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TPWD, state parks need support of the people

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU
 
white cloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 06:50 AM
Original message
TPWD, state parks need support of the people
TPWD, state parks need support of the people 2011-03-23 / Viewpoints
JANICE BEZANSON Austin
With the state facing a budget shortfall, all agencies are facing cuts and layoffs of staff. Efforts are underway to minimize the impacts to the state parks and fish and wildlife resources managed by Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.

The Appropriations Committee of the Texas House of Representatives honored a number of Texas Parks and Wildlife Dept.’s requests for flexibility in how its budget is cut, but did not approve key capital needs.

Now TPWD’s budget considerations are moving to the Texas Senate.


At the end of this letter is a list of the senators on the Senate Finance Committee.

If you live in the district of one of the committee members, your voice is especially powerful for protecting state parks and wildlife resources.

Please contact your Texas Senator and urge him/her to do the following:

http://www.thecherokeean.com/news/2011-03-23/Viewpoints/TPWD_state_parks_need_support_of_the_people.html
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
white cloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Major budget cuts to parks approved by House committee
This morning, the House Appropriations Committee voted 18-7 in favor of a state budget that would make major cuts to our state parks system. This budget could force the closure of at least seven state parks, drastically reduce services at the rest, and eliminate funding for local parks and playgrounds.

The budget is expected to go before the full Texas House on Friday, April 1 (April Fools' Day). Lawmakers would be fools to cut parks funding. In 2008, out-of-state visitors to our parks spent $283 million in local Texas communities — a big help to the economy.


My staff and I are working to get the word out about these threats. Already, we’ve gotten letters to the editor printed in nine newspapers across the state<1-9>. And with your help, next week we’ll organize several press conferences around the state to get this issue on TV and on the radio.

We’ve already raised $1630, more than halfway toward our goal of $3000. Can you donate $25 to help us meet our goal? You can make a secure donation here.

Sincerely,


Luke Metzger
Environment Texas Director


<1> "Parks in danger of closing," Lufkin Daily News, March 10, 2011.

<2> "Hands off Texas parks," San Antonio Express-News, March 14, 2011.

<3> "Hands off our parks," Austin American-Statesman, March 14, 2011.

<4> "Texas Parks Need Protection," Odessa American, March 15, 2011.

<5> "Protect State Parks," Abilene Reporter-News, March 15, 2011.

<6> "Hands Off Parks," El Paso Times, March 16, 2011.

<7> "Don’t let our state parks wilt away," The Shorthorn (UT Arlington student newspaper) March 20, 2011

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
white cloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hands off parks
Hands off parks

The Legislature is considering transferring seven state parks to cities or counties in order shed costs, including Wyler Aerial Tramway in El Paso.

However, if local municipalities aren't in the financial position to accept that burden, Texas Parks & Wildlife will have to close these parks, and possibly many more.

Our state parks are wonderful places to hike, swim and camp.

They protect some of Texas' most scenic views and the wildlife and waterways that call them home.

How could the Legislature ever think of shutting down these beautiful places?

It's not like these parks don't pay for themselves.

In fact, the only reason these legislators are proposing to close these parks is so they can raid the state parks fund and use the money for something else.

That is just wrong.

These parks are a big part of what makes Texas great.

They're the kind of thing we stand up for, even when times are tough.

(In fact, closing state parks is one of the worst moves legislators could make for the economy -- given that out-of-state visitors to Texas parks spent $283 million in 2008.)

So let's make sure they hear us loud and clear: hands off our parks!

Alejandro Savransky

Austin

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
white cloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Texas Parks & Wildlife Agency Faces Big Cuts


State parks. Hunter education. Even a magazine targeted at outdoorsmen. Each is likely to feel the effect of a looming 21 to 25 percent budget cut for the Texas Parks & Wildlife Department.

The most obvious of the reductions, which could amount to as much as $162 million over the biennium, will cut into the operations of state parks. Both the initial House and Senate budget proposals call for the agency to cease operating seven state parks scattered across the state — from Lockhart State Park to Big Spring State Park in Howard County to the Wyler Aerial Tramway in El Paso. The moves would yield $2.7 million in savings, with potentially 60 full-time positions cut.

Parks & Wildlife has hoped to transfer the parks to local jurisdictions, which could keep them open. But "most of those local communities have indicated that they would be unable to operate those parks," said Gene McCarty, the agency's deputy executive director for administration. He noted that it's still possible that the seven parks may not be forced to close, because the budget cuts could be distributed across other parks, for example, by cutting hours or instituting temporary closures elsewhere. No park pays for itself with user fees, he said, although Blanco State Park and Lake Casa Blanca International State Park near Laredo — both on the list of seven parks that the state wants to stop administering — come fairly close. Closing a park comes with a care-taking costs, the department notes, so such a move is not a panacea.

The cuts will be painful for a park system that was "only just beginning to recover from having been underfunded for a long period of time," said Janice Bezanson, executive director of the Texas Conservation Alliance, who noted that there would also, clearly, be no funds to buy new parklands to be available for the state's growing population. Plans for a new park in the Fort Worth area probably will be shelved, at least for now. McCarty said the cuts are unlikely to affect the Devil's River parkland acquired with the help of private funding late last year, because operations for the first few years are already funded.

Other areas will feel the axe as well. Fewer courses in hunter education — a requirement for all new hunters born in or after September 1971 — may be available, McCarty said, and less state parkland is likely to be available for hunting. The state leases some private land for hunting — so with less money there will be less land to lease; Parks & Wildlife estimated in February that some 961,000 acres could be taken out of leasing or related programs.

Kirby Brown, vice president of the Texas Wildlife Association, a landowner and hunter group, expressed concern that hunter education could be shut down altogether. "You really can't shut down your hunter education" for six months, he said, because it would drastically affect new hunter recruitment. But McCarty said that was unlikely to happen, because the Legislature has seemed amenable to giving the department the flexibility to spread cuts over the fiscal 2012-13 biennium. (Original proposals from the Legislative Budget Board were front-loaded to create an especially deep impact in the first six months.)

Parks & Wildlife is also bracing for impacts to a range of other areas — partly as a result of anticipated layoffs of a few hundred employees. In a recent memo, the agency warned of a "significant reduction" in its ability to contain invasive aquatic species, which may move from reservoir to reservoir on boat bottoms and choke out other species (aquatic vegetative management programs in the Houston and Corpus Christi areas could be eliminated altogether). Even the agency's environmental reviews for controversial projects like the state's $5 billion wind-power transmission lines, or new roads built by the department of transportation, could see 30 percent reductions, and its ability to respond to oil spills would also be impaired.

Even the Parks & Wildlife magazine, which has a circulation of more than 150,000, will likely see a reduction, McCarty said. It raises two-thirds of its production money; nonetheless, the number of pages or the number of issues will get cut, he said.

It is still months before the legislative budgeting process is likely to play out. Both House and Senate bills are still being worked on and must go before their respective chambers for a vote before being reconciled into a single bill that the governor can sign.

"If I had a message for the legislature," Bezanson of the Texas Conservation Alliance said, "it would be: I understand you've got a serious problem here, but try to minimize the damage."

http://bigcountryhomepage.com/fulltext/?nxd_id=350966

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 14th 2025, 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC