Jimbo S
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-21-05 05:44 PM
Original message |
| Doyle's tax freeze proposal |
|
A sell out or a shrewd move to take steam away from Gard?
|
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-21-05 05:45 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Doyle? Gard? Tax freeze?....Do you have a link? |
Jimbo S
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-22-05 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. Doyle's State of the State address |
|
Wisconsin State Journal: "Doyle: Cap Property Tax" http://www.madison.com/archives/read.php?ref=wsj:2005:02:09:403148:FRONTThe Capital Times: "Doyle Gets GOP Fuming" http://www.madison.com/archives/read.php?ref=tct:2005:02:09:403216:FRONTI know it's from a couple of weeks ago, but I'm surprised there is no banter on here about it. This is the issue that will make or break Doyle's re-election.
|
ewagner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-21-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
:hi:
Not sure yet. There are some "sleepers" in this budget that are going to piss off a lot of people.
I'm still concerned about the 6% assessment against HMOs....that is NOT popular among either Repubs or Dems in this heavily medically oriented city......
|
htuttle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-22-05 09:33 AM
Response to Original message |
| 4. It's not perfect, but it's better than Gard's idea |
|
They say politics is the art of the possible. I do not think a perfect plan is possible with the state legislature in primarily Republican hands.
At least the schools are going to be happy.
|
Lisaben2619
(193 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-22-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. Privatizing state workers could have come from Gard |
gizmo1979
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-26-05 05:59 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. Much better than the repugs plan. |
|
Doyle emphasizes education and that to me shows he gets it and he cares!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 19th 2026, 04:35 AM
Response to Original message |