Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Canada 'absolute worst country at the talks'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 01:34 PM
Original message
Canada 'absolute worst country at the talks'
We got the 'fossil of the year' award, with that citation.

http://www.cbc.ca/politics/story/2009/12/18/climate-canada-award.html

I'm so proud. :eyes:
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just watch the Harperites come home from Copenhagen and brag
about the great contribution they made to the talks. This is what they always do and they seem to get away with it! DISGUSTING!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Harder to do this time,
with all the bad news about us from Copenhagen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's true but I'm sure they will still spin their lies
and make it look as if they were working behind the scenes doing good...or something...
Even Brian Mulroney didn't have the hutzpah (spelling?) that Harper and his gang have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You're right, the media is trying to give Harper credit.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper and other world leaders — including those from the U.S., China, India, Brazil and South Africa — are leaving Copenhagen with a compromise climate deal and a vow to work out the details.

The agreement offers money to developing nations to help them fight global warming provided they agree to open their books to international scrutiny.

Harper called it a "comprehensive and realistic" agreement, while U.S. President Barack Obama hailed it as a "meaningful and unprecedented breakthrough."

However, the agreement is not binding and does not set new greenhouse-gas reduction targets. Instead, countries are to set their own emission-reduction commitments, which would not be legally binding.

Those commitments will be the subject of further negotiation, with the aim of a final deal at next year's summit in Mexico. It's a compromise following 12 days of divisive talks that saw hopes dwindle as the summit's close drew near.

http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2009/12/18/copenhagen-last-day.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. This one starts out boosting him.
But finds it has to end on a limp note.

-snip-

Mr. Harper insisted that he and the Canadian delegation played a constructive role in the talks, despite his absence from key negotiating sessions among leading G20 countries.

He said Canada's interests were being looked after by “strategic allies” and that each country could not demand to be at every meeting in a conference of 192 nations.

Critics of the government say Canada's effectiveness as a negotiator was undermined by its poor record of compliance with commitments under the Kyoto Protocol and by its unambitious emissions targets.


http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/climate-change/canadas-strategy-promise-now-implement-later/article1406232/
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Harper simply doesn't believe in Global warming science
Partly it's a cognitive dissonance thing - he represents oil company interests, so he simply cannot take global warming as a serious threat and still maintain some sort of mental equilibrium. I think there may also be some religious aspect to his disdain for the science. Add in his training in economics, which mostly ignores the fundamentals of the earth and life sciences, and you have the quintessential denialist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 14th 2025, 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC